green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
12.0 score
“as petitioner has repeatedly abused this court's process, the clerk is directed not to accept any further petitions in noncriminal matters from petitioner unless the docketing fee required by rule 38(a) is paid and the petition is submitted in compliance with rule 33.1.”
Top citers, strongest first. 2 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
VENERI, JR. v. STATE CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION
as petitioner has repeatedly abused this court's process, the clerk is directed not to accept any further petitions in noncriminal matters from petitioner unless the docketing fee required by rule 38(a) is paid and the petition is submitted in compliance with rule 33.1.
discussed
Cited "see"
VENERI v. COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA
See In re Veneri, 531 U.S. 810 (2000) (“As petitioner has repeatedly abused this Court's process, the Clerk is directed not to accept any further petitions in noncriminal matters from petitioner unless the docketing fee e.g., Veneri v. Commonwealth of Pa., E.D.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
In re Veneri
No. 00-5382.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 2, 2000.
Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis denied, and petition for writ of habeas corpus dismissed. See this Court’s Rule 39.8. As petitioner has repeatedly abused this Court’s process, the Clerk is directed not to accept any further petitions in noncriminal matters from petitioner unless the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) is paid and the petition is submitted in compliance with Rule 33.1. See Martin v. District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 506 U. S. 1 (1992) (per curiam).
Justice Stevens dissents.See id., at 4, and eases cited therein.