Fodor v. United States Dist. Court for the Cent. Dist. of California, 531 U.S. 1037 (2000).

Fodor v. United States Dist. Court for the Cent. Dist. of California, 531 U.S. 1037 (2000). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite

green Positive treatment 7.0 score

70 citation events (70 in the last 25 years) across 16 distinct courts.

Strongest positive: Barnett v. United States (scd, 2023-01-10)

Treatment trajectory · 2001 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of

2001 2013 2026

Top citers, strongest first. 18 distinct citers. How cited ↗

cited Cited "see" Barnett v. United States

D.S.C. · 2023 · signal: see · confidence high

See Calhoun v. Yamaha Motor Corp., 216 F.3d 338, 345 (3d Cir.2000), cert. denied, 531 U.S. 1037 (2000).

cited Cited "see" ROETTGEN v. Ryan

C.D. Cal. · 2009 · signal: see · confidence high

See Bains v. Cambra, 204 F.3d 964 , 971 n. 2 (9th Cir.) (citation omitted), cert. denied, 531 U.S. 1037 , 121 S.Ct. 627 , 148 L.Ed.2d 536 (2000).

discussed Cited "see" Dotson v. Scribner

C.D. Cal. · 2008 · signal: see · confidence high

(LD 7 at 16-17); see Bains v. Cambra, 204 *876 F.3d 964, 975 (9th Cir.) (“by deeming two errors as being merely errors under state evidentiary law, the California Court of Appeal improperly selected the Watson standard rather than the Chapman standard in evaluating those errors”), cert. denied, 531 U.S. 1037 , 121 S.Ct. 627 , 148 L.Ed.2d 536 (2000).

cited Cited "see" Corey v. McNamara

D. Nev. · 2006 · signal: see · confidence high

See Brady v. United States, 211 F.3d 499, 502 (9th Cir.), cert denied, 531 U.S. 1037 , 121 S.Ct. 627 , 148 L.Ed.2d 536 (2000); Cadwalder v. United States, 45 F.3d 297, 300 (9th Cir.1995).

discussed Cited "see" United States v. Morehouse

D. Me. · 2004 · signal: see · confidence high

See United States v. Hicks, 217 F.3d 1038, 1048-49 (9th Cir.2000), cert. denied, 531 U.S. 1037 , 121 S.Ct. 627 , 148 L.Ed.2d 536 (2000); United States v. Yeaman, 194 F.3d 442, 457 (3d Cir.1999), cert. denied, 534 U.S. 1082 , 122 S.Ct. 816 , 151 L.Ed.2d 699 (2002); United States v. Molina, 106 F.3d 1118, 1124-25 (2d Cir.1997), cert. denied, 520 U.S. 1247 , 117 S.Ct. 1859 , 137 L.Ed.2d 1060 (1997).

discussed Cited "see" Saldano v. Cockrell

E.D. Tex. · 2003 · signal: see · confidence high

See Bains v. Cambra, 204 F.3d 964, 974 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 531 U.S. 1037 , 121 S.Ct. 627 , 148 L.Ed.2d 536 (2000); see also Guerra, 916 F.Supp. at 636 . 2. validity of the waiver of affirmative defenses Both procedural default and harmless error are affirmative defenses which are waived by the respondent if not timely and unequivocally raised.

discussed Cited "see" Mendoza v. Stewart

9th Cir. · 2002 · signal: see · confidence high

See Bains v. Cambra, 204 F.3d 964, 973-74, 977-78 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 531 U.S. 1037 , 121 S.Ct. 627 , 148 L.Ed.2d 536 (2000) (holding that although admission of threats was in error and prosecutor’s closing arguments violated defendant’s constitutional rights, these errors did not merit habeas relief in light of the overwhelming evidence showing defendant’s guilt).

discussed Cited "see" Garcia v. Ayers

9th Cir. · 2002 · signal: see · confidence high

Brecht v. Abrahamson, 507 U.S. 619, 638 , 113 S.Ct. 1710 , 123 L.Ed.2d 353 (1993); see Bains v. Cambra, 204 F.3d 964, 977 (9th Cir.2000) (holding that Brecht standard applies in all federal habeas cases under § 2254), cert. denied, 531 U.S. 1037 , 121 S.Ct. 627 , 148 L.Ed.2d 536 (2000).

discussed Cited "see" United States v. Peshlakai

9th Cir. · 2002 · signal: see · confidence high

See United States v. Hicks, 217 F.3d 1038, 1045 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 531 U.S. 1037 , 121 S.Ct. 627 , 148 L.Ed.2d 536 (2000). (2) Peshlakai next contends that the district court erred when it imposed enhancements which had an extremely disproportionate effect upon its sentence, 1 but used a preponderance of the evidence standard in so doing.

cited Cited "see" United States v. Daniel Clark Summers