discussed Cited "see" People v. Ramirez (Daniel) The testimony established that the primary purpose of the checkpoint was to prevent and deter drunk driving ( see People v Scott , 63 NY2d 518, 525 [1984]), the degree of intrusion on drivers' liberty and privacy interests was minimal ( see Scott at 526-527 ), and the procedure followed, namely stopping every car except taxis, livery and commercial vehicles, was "uniform and not gratuitous or subject to individually discriminatory selection" ( People v Dugan , 57 AD3d 300 , 301 [2008], lv denied 11 NY3d 924 [2009], quoting People v Serrano , 233 AD2d 170, 171 [1996], lv denied 89 NY2d 929 [199…