green
Positive treatment
5.3 score
Treatment trajectory · 2001 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2001
2013
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 15 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
cited
Cited "see"
Farris Genner Morris, Jr. v. State of Tennessee
See State v. Morris, 24 S.W.3d 788 (Tenn. 2000), cert. denied, 531 U.S. 1082 (2001).
discussed
Cited "see"
Bowen v. Blaine
(2×)
See Lines v. Larkins, 208 F.3d 153, 159-60 (3d Cir.2000), ce rt. denied, 531 U.S. 1082 , 121 S.Ct. 785 , 148 L.Ed.2d 681 (2001).
cited
Cited "see"
Kirk v. Carroll
See Lines v. Larkins, 208 F.3d 153, 160 (3d Cir.2000), cert. denied, 531 U.S. 1082 , 121 S.Ct. 785 , 148 L.Ed.2d 681 (2001).
cited
Cited "see"
Charles L. Lorraine v. Ralph Coyle, Warden
See Byrd v. Collins, 209 F.3d 486, 512 (6th Cir.2000), cert. denied, 531 U.S. 1082 , 121 S.Ct. 786 , 148 L.Ed.2d 682 (2001); Mapes v. Coyle, 171 F.3d 408, 421-22 (6th Cir.1999).
cited
Cited "see"
State of Tennessee v. William Garrett
See State v. Morris, 24 S.W.3d 788, 795 (Tenn. 2000), cert. denied, 531 U.S. 1082 , 121 S. Ct. 786 (2001); Liakas v. State, 286 S.W.2d 856, 859 (Tenn. 1956).
cited
Cited "see"
State of Tennessee v. Lue J. Holcomb
See State v. Morris, 24 S.W.3d 788, 795 (Tenn. 2000), cert. denied, 531 U.S. 1082 , 121 S. Ct. 786 (2001); Liakas v. State, 286 S.W.2d 856, 859 (Tenn. 1956).
discussed
Cited "see"
In Re: John W. Byrd, Jr. Movant
(2×)
See Byrd v. Collins, 531 U.S. 1082 , 148 L.
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Byrd
See Byrd v. Collins (2001), 531 U.S. 1082 , 121 S.Ct. 786 , 148 L.Ed.2d 682 . 15 .
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Stone v. Superintendent, SCI Frackville
See, e.g., Lines v. Larkins, 208 F.3d 153 , 164–66 (3d Cir. 2000), cert. denied, 531 U.S. 1082 (2001); Sistrunk v. Vaughn, 96 F.3d 666 , 674–75 (3d Cir. 1996).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Bennett v. Warden, Lebanon Correctional Institute
To be considered reg *489 ularly followed, a procedural rule need not be applied in every relevant case, but rather “[i]n the vast majority of cases.” Dugger v. Adams, 489 U.S. 401 , 410 n. 6, 109 S.Ct. 1211 , 103 L.Ed.2d 435 (1989); see also Byrd v. Collins, 209 F.3d 486, 521 (6th Cir.2000), cert. denied, 531 U.S. 1082 , 121 S.Ct. 786 , 148 L.Ed.2d 682 (2001).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Berry
(2×)
Id. (citations omitted); see also State v. Morris, 24 S.W.3d 788, 813 (Tenn.2000) (Appendix), cer t. denied, 531 U.S. 1082 , 121 S.Ct. 786 , 148 L.Ed.2d 682 (2001).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Benge v. Johnson
“Indeed, it is notable how often courts cite improper argument by a prosecutor and how seldom they reverse convictions because of it.” Roe v. Baker, 316 F.3d 557, 566 (6th Cir.2002)(quoting United States v. Bess, 593 F.2d 749, 757 (6th Cir.1979)), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 124 S.Ct. 140 , 157 L.Ed.2d 95 (2003); see also Byrd v. Collins, 209 F.3d 486, 537 (6 Cir.2000)(“we conclude that the demanding standard for habeas relief has not been met.”), cert. denied, 531 U.S. 1082 , 121 S.Ct. 786 , 148 L.Ed.2d 682 (2001).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
State of Tennessee v. Gdongalay P. Berry
Id. (citations omitted); see also State v. Morris, 24 S.W.3d 788, 813 (Tenn. 2000) (Appendix), cert. denied, 531 U.S. 1082 , 121 S. Ct. 786 (2001).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
In re Byrd
Our order stayed Byrd’s execution for "120 days to allow for further investigation and discovery of possible habeas claims.” See Collins v. Byrd, 510 U.S. 1185 , 114 S.Ct. 1288 , 127 L.Ed.2d 642 (1994) (Scalia, J., dissenting); see also Byrd v. Collins, 209 F.3d 486, 499 (6th Cir.2000), cert. denied, 531 U.S. 1082 , 121 S.Ct. 786 , 148 L.Ed.2d 682 (2001). .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
In Re John W. BYRD, Jr., Movant
(2×)
Our order stayed Byrd's execution for "120 days to allow for further investigation and discovery of possible habeas claims." See Collins v. Byrd, 510 U.S. 1185 (1994) (Scalia, J., dissenting); see also Byrd v. Collins, 209 F.3d F.3d 486, 499 (6th Cir. 2000), cert. denied, 531 U.S. 1082 (2001). 8 Byrd indicates that he seeks to raise in his second or successive petition, the following claims: 1)A Massiah claim involving the state's use of informant Virgil Jordan to elicit statements from Byrd in violation of his Sixth Amendment right to counsel; 2) A claim that prosecutors presented testimony t…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Simpson
v.
Florida Department of Corrections
v.
Florida Department of Corrections
No. 00-6347.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jan 8, 2001.
Published
C. A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied.