green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
5.8 score
“district court's rule 403 balancing stands unless it is an abuse of discretion.”
Top citers, strongest first. 4 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
United States v. Jose A. Otero-Mendez
district court's rule 403 balancing stands unless it is an abuse of discretion.
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Marston
See United States v. Hernández, 218 F.3d 58 , 63 n. 3 (1st Cir.2000), cert. denied, 531 U.S. 1103 , 121 S.Ct. 840 , 148 L.Ed.2d 720 (2001). 2 .
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Mendez Otero
See United States v. Hernández, 218 F.3d 58, 70 (1st Cir. 2000), cert. denied, 531 U.S. 1103 (2001) ("district court's Rule 403 balancing stands unless it is an abuse of discretion."); see also United States v. Rosario-Peralta, 199 F.3d 552, 561 (1st Cir. 1999).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Fleming
See also United States v. Reed, 220 F.3d 476 (6th Cir.2000), cert. denied, 531 U.S. 1103 , 121 S.Ct. 842 , 148 L.Ed.2d 722 (2001). (probable cause supported warrantless arrest for misdemeanor trespassing).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Doe
v.
United States
v.
United States
No. 00-7357.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jan 8, 2001.
Published
Citer courts: First Circuit (1)
C. A. 6th Cir. Certio-rari denied.