green
Positive treatment
3.5 score
Top citers, strongest first. 4 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Fields
See Thomas v. Anchorage Equal Rights Comm’n, 220 F.3d 1134 , 1138 (9th Cir.2000) (en banc) ("Our role is neither to issue advisory opinions nor to declare rights in hypothetical cases ....”), cert. denied, 531 U.S. 1143 , 121 S.Ct. 1078 , 148 L.Ed.2d 955 (2001).
cited
Cited "see"
Young v. Seling
See Thomas v. Anchorage Equal Rights Comm’n, 220 F.3d 1134 , 1139 n. 3 (9th Cir.2000) (en banc), cert. denied, 531 U.S. 1143 , 121 S.Ct. 1078 , 148 L.Ed.2d 955 (2001).
cited
Cited "see"
Castillo v. Gomez
See Thomas v. Anchorage Equal Rights Comm’n, 220 F.3d 1134 , 1139 n. 3 (9th Cir.2000) (en banc), cert. denied, 531 U.S. 1143 , 121 S.Ct. 1078 , 148 L.Ed.2d 955 (2001).
cited
Cited "see"
Prairie Band of Potawatomi Indians v. Pierce
See generally Sac & Fox Nation of Mo. v. Pierce, 213 F.3d 566 (10th Cir.2000), cert. denied, 121 S.Ct. 1078 (2001).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Thomas
v.
Anchorage Equal Rights Commission
v.
Anchorage Equal Rights Commission
No. 00-499.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Feb 20, 2001.
Published
C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.