discussed Cited "see, e.g." Hughes v. Phillips Moreover, petitioner must do more than show that he would have satisfied Strickland’s test if his claim were being analyzed in the first instance, as “it is the habeas applicant’s burden to show that the state court applied Strickland to the facts of his case in an objectively unreasonable manner.” Woodford v. Visciotti, 537 U.S. 19 , 123 S.Ct. 357 , 154 L.Ed.2d 279 (2002); see also Sacco v. Cooksey, 214 F.3d 270, 274-275 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 531 U.S. 1156 , 121 S.Ct. 1107 , 148 L.Ed.2d 977 (2001); Aeid v. Bennett, 296 F.3d 58 (2d Cir.2002).