green
Positive treatment
4.8 score
Top citers, strongest first. 3 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Glaspy
See United States v. King, 119 F.3d 290, 295 (4th Cir.1997), cert. denied 531 U.S. 1193 , 121 S.Ct. 1193 , 149 L.Ed.2d 108 (2001).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Umburger
See United States v. King, 119 F.3d 290 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 531 U.S. 1193 , 121 S.Ct. 1193 , 149 L.Ed.2d 108 (2001).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Moyer
See State v. Ward , 292 Kan. 541 , 578, 256 P.3d 801 (2011), cert. denied 565 U.S. 1221 , 132 S.Ct. 1594 , 182 L.Ed.2d 205 (2012). 'No prejudicial error may be found upon this cumulative effect rule ... if the evidence is overwhelming against the defendant.' State v. Colston , 290 Kan. 952 , Syl. ¶ 1, 235 P.3d 1234 (2010) ; see, e.g. , Alvarez v. Boyd , 225 F.3d 820 , 824-25 (7th Cir. 2000) (listing various factors to be considered in cumulative error analysis), cert. denied 531 U.S. 1192 , 121 S.Ct. 1192 , 149 L.Ed.2d 108 (2001) ; United States v. Fernandez , 145 F.3d 59 , 66 (1st Cir. 1998)…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Mihn Van Bui
v.
Alarcon, Director, California Department of Corrections
v.
Alarcon, Director, California Department of Corrections
No. 00-1137.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Feb 26, 2001.
Published
C. A. 9th Cir. Certio-rari denied.