green
Positive treatment
6.0 score
Treatment trajectory · 2000 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2000
2013
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 15 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
cited
Cited "see"
State Of Louisiana v. Andrew Jerome Francis
See State v. Hampton, 98- 0331 La. 4 / 23/ 99), 750 So. 2d 867, 879 , cert. denied, 528 U. S. 1007 , 120 S. Ct. 504 , 145 L.Ed.2d 390 1999 ); State v. Edmond, 2012- 0628 ( La.
cited
Cited "see"
State Of Louisiana v. Christopher James Landry
See State v. Hampton, 98- 0331 ( La. 4/ 23/ 99), 750 So. 2d 867, 880 , cert. denied, 528 U.S. 1007 , 120 S. Ct. 504 , 145 L.Ed.2d 390 ( 1999); State v. Creel, 2014- 0680 ( La.
discussed
Cited "see"
Brockway v. Burge
See Smith v. McGinnis, 208 F.3d at 17 (stating that equitable tolling applies only in “rare and exceptional circumstances”) (citing Turner v. Johnson, 177 F.3d 390, 391-92 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 528 U.S. 1007 , 120 S.Ct. 504 , 145 L.Ed.2d 389 (1999)).
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Fedele
See State v. Hampton, 98-0331, pp. 12-13 (La. 4/23/99), 750 So.2d 867, 879-880 , cert. denied, 528 U.S. 1007 , 120 S.Ct. 504 , 145 L.Ed.2d 390 (1999); State v. Snyder, 98-1078, p. 37 n.21 & 22 (La. 4/14/99), 750 So.2d 832 , 859 n.21 & 22.
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Johnson
See, State v. Hampton, 98-0331 (La.4/23/99), 750 So.2d 867, 877 , cert. denied, 528 U.S. 1007 , 120 S.Ct. 504 , 145 L.Ed.2d 390 (1999). [4] We note that, if the Defendant had committed the armed robbery before June 15, 2001, he would have been subject to a mandatory life sentence as a third felony offender.
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Irish
See State v. Hampton, 98-0331 (La.4/23/99), 750 So.2d 867 , cert. denied, 528 U.S. 1007 , 120 S.Ct. 504 , 145 L.Ed.2d 390 (1999); State v. Davis, 92-1623 (La.5/23/94), 637 So.2d 1012 , cert. denied, 513 U.S. 975 , 115 S.Ct. 450 , 130 L.Ed.2d 359 ; State v. Ford, 489 So.2d 1250 (La.1986), vacated, 479 U.S. 1077 , 107 S.Ct. 1272 , 94 L.Ed.2d 133 (1987).
cited
Cited "see"
Mendoza-Medina v. Medellin
See Turner v. Johnson, 177 F.3d 390, 392-93 (5th Cir.) (§ 2254), cert. denied, 120 S. Ct. 504 (1999).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State of Louisiana v. Kolby Reshaad Moore
App. 4 Cir. 1993), writ denied, 93-1939 (La. 10/16/93), 14 625 So. 2d 1062 ; see also State v. Hampton, 98-0331 (La. 4/23/99), 750 So. 2d 867, 880 , cert. denied, 528 U.S. 1007 , 120 S. Ct. 504 , 145 L.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Nabors
App. 4 Cir. 1993), writ denied , 1993-1939 (La. 10/16/93), 625 So.2d 1062 ; see also State v. Hampton, 1998-0331 (La. 4/23/99), 750 So.2d 867 , 880, cert. denied , 528 U.S. 1007 , 120 S.Ct. 504 , 145 L.Ed.2d 390 (1999).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Massey
State v. Gilliam, 36,118 (La.App. 2 Cir. 8/30/02), 827 So.2d 508 , writ denied, 02-3090 (La.11/14/03), 858 So.2d 422 ; see also State v. Hampton, 98-331, p. 13 (La.4/23/99), 750 So.2d 867, 880 , cert. denied, 528 U.S. 1007 , 120 S.Ct. 504 , 145 L.Ed.2d 390 (1999).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Hamilton
See also State v. Hampton, 98-331 (La.4/23/99), 750 So.2d 867 , cert. denied, 528 U.S. 1007 , 120 S.Ct. 504 , 145 L.Ed.2d 390 (1999).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Johnston
See United States v. Brierton, No. 98-10382 (5th Cir. Jan. 12, 1999) (unpublished) (concluding that § 2255 motions are distinct from habeas petitions, precluding application of the Suspension Clause); see also Turner v. Johnson, 177 F.3d 390 , 392 & n.1 (5th Cir.) (finding in dicta Brierton to be persuasive), cert. denied, 120 S. Ct. 504 (1999).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Johnston
See United States v. Brierton, No. 98-10382 (5th Cir. Jan. 12, 1999) (unpublished) (concluding that § 2255 motions are distinct from habeas petitions, precluding application of the Suspension Clause); see also Turner v. Johnson, 177 F.3d 390 , 392 & n.1 (5th Cir.) (finding in dicta Brierton to be persuasive), cert. denied, 120 S. Ct. 504 (1999).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Edward John Johnston, Iii, Also Known as Easy, Also Known as Ez, Also Known as Charles Edward Johnson, III
(2×)
See United States v. Brierton, No. 98-10382 (5th Cir. Jan. 12, 1999) (unpublished) (concluding that § 2255 motions are distinct from habeas petitions, precluding application of the Suspension Clause); see also Turner v. Johnson, 177 F.3d 390 , 392 & n.1 (5th Cir.) (finding in dicta Brierton to be persuasive), cert. denied, 120 S. Ct. 504 (1999).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Cook
In the habeas context, equitable tolling applies only in “rare and exceptional circumstances.” Davis v. Johnson, 158 F.3d 806, 811 (5th Cir.1998), cert. denied, 526 U.S. 1074 , 119 S.Ct. 1474 , 143 L.Ed.2d 558 (1999); see also Calderon v. United States District Court, 112 F.3d 386, 391 (9th Cir.1997) (equitable tolling should only be allowed when “extraordinary circumstances” beyond a prisoner’s control make it impossible to file a timely motion). “[N]either a plaintiffs unfamiliarity with the legal pro *1015 cess nor his lack of representation during the applicable filing period m…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Votta
v.
Gnazzo
v.
Gnazzo
No. 99-6122.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Nov 15, 1999.
Published
C. A. 1st Cir. Certio-rari denied.