green
Positive treatment
6.2 score
Treatment trajectory · 2000 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2000
2013
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 14 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
cited
Cited "but see"
United States v. Fujii
But see United States v. Paul, 175 F.3d 906, 910-11 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, 528 U.S. 1023 , 120 S.Ct. 535 , 145 L.Ed.2d 415 (1999).
cited
Cited "see"
State of Tennessee v. Richard Hale Austin
See generally State v. Smith, 993 S.W.2d 6, 17 (Tenn. 1999), cert. denied, 528 U.S. 1023 , 120 S. Ct. 536 (1999).
cited
Cited "see"
Harold Wayne Nichols v. State
See State v. Smith, 993 S.W.2d 6 (Tenn.), cert. denied, 528 U.S. 1023 , 120 S. Ct. 536 , 145 L.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Simon Lundy, Sr.
United States v. Forman, No. 08‐2177, 2009 WL 140502, at *3 (7th Cir. Jan. 22, 2009); see also United States v. Tidwell, 178 F.3d 946, 949 (7th Cir. 1999), cert denied, 528 U.S. 1023 (1999); United States v. Legree, 205 F.3d 724, 730 (4th Cir. 2000); United States v. Townsend, 98 F.3d 510 , 512‐13 (9th Cir. 1996); United States v. Whitebird, 55 F.3d 1007, 1011 (5th Cir. 1995); United States v. Reddick, 53 F.3d 462, 465 (2nd Cir. 1995).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Lundy
United States v. Forman, 553 F.3d 585, 589-90 (7th Cir.2009); see also United States v. Tidwell, 178 F.3d 946, 949 (7th Cir.1999), cert denied, 528 U.S. 1023 , 120 S.Ct. 535 , 145 L.Ed.2d 415 (1999); United States v. Legree, 205 F.3d 724, 730 (4th Cir.2000); United States v. Townsend, 98 F.3d 510, 512-13 (9th Cir.1996); United States v. Whitebird, 55 F.3d 1007, 1011 (5th Cir.1995); United States v. Reddick, 53 F.3d 462, 465 (2d Cir.1995).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Lundy
United States v. Forman, 553 F.3d 585, 589-90 (7th Cir.2009); see also United States v. Tidwell, 178 F.3d 946, 949 (7th Cir.1999), cert denied, 528 U.S. 1023 , 120 S.Ct. 535 , 145 L.Ed.2d 415 (1999); United States v. Legree, 205 F.3d 724, 730 (4th Cir.2000); United States v. Townsend, 98 F.3d 510, 512-13 (9th Cir.1996); United States v. Whitebird, 55 F.3d 1007, 1011 (5th Cir.1995); United States v. Reddick, 53 F.3d 462, 465 (2d Cir.1995).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Forman
See, e.g., United States v. Tidwell, 178 F.3d 946, 949 (7th Cir.1999), cert. denied, 528 U.S. 1023 , 120 S.Ct. 535 , 145 L.Ed.2d 415 (1999); see also United States v. Legree, 205 F.3d 724, 730 (4th Cir.2000); United States v. Townsend, 98 F.3d 510, 512-13 (9th Cir.1996); United States v. Whitebird, 55 F.3d 1007, 1011 (5th Cir.1995); United States v. Reddick, 53 F.3d 462, 463-65 (2d Cir.1995).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Troy Fuller
See, e.g., United States v. Tidwell, 178 F.3d 946, 949 (7th Cir. 1999), cert. denied, 528 U.S. 1023 (1999); see also United States v. Legree, 205 F.3d 724, 730 (4th Cir. 2000); United States v. Townsend, 98 F.3d 510, 512-13 (9th Cir. 1996); United States v. Whitebird, 55 F.3d Nos. 08-2177, 08-2192, 08-2248, 08-2629, 08-3063 9 1007, 1011 (5th Cir. 1995); United States v. Reddick, 53 F.3d 462, 463-65 (2d Cir. 1995).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Pink v. State
(2×)
Rutledge, 1973 OK CR 107, ¶ 6 , 507 P.2d at 552 ; see also L.E.Y. v. State, 1982 OK CR 4, ¶ 6 , 639 P.2d 1253, 1255 ("Corroborating evidence must terd to connect the defendant with the commission of the offense absent the accomplice's testimony.") (citing Jones v. State, 1976 OK CR 261 , 555 P.2d 1061 ). . 1998 OK CR 45, ¶ 20 , 968 P.2d at 830 (citing Johns v. State, 1987 OK CR 178 , 742 P.2d 1142, 1146 ); see also DeLozier v. State, 1998 OK CR 76, ¶ 13 , 991 P.2d 22, 26 ("If the accomplice's testimony is corroborated as to one material fact by independent evidence tending to connect the d…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Reid
(2×)
Limitation of Inquiry into Mental Health Evidence as Mitigating Circumstance Tennessee Rule of Criminal Procedure 24(a), in pertinent part, states that the trial court "shall permit questioning by the parties for the purpose of discovering bases for challenge for cause and enabling an intelligent exercise of peremptory challenges." It further states that "[t]he court ... may direct that any portion of the questioning of a prospective juror be conducted out of the presence of the tentatively selected jurors and other prospective jurors." Although the rule provides no test for determining whethe…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State of Tennessee v. Paul Dennis Reid, Jr.
Limitation of Inquiry into Mental Health Evidence as Mitigating Circumstance Tennessee Rule of Criminal Procedure 24(a), in pertinent part, states that the trial court "shall permit questioning by the parties for the purpose of discovering bases for challenge for cause and enabling an intelligent exercise of peremptory challenges." It further states that "[t]he court . . . may direct that any portion of the questioning of a prospective juror be conducted out of the presence of the tentatively selected jurors and other prospective jurors." Although the rule provides no test for determining whet…
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Rodriguez-Arreola
See also United States v. Pruitt, 174 F.3d 1215 (11th Cir.1999) ce rt. denied, 528 U.S. 1023 , 120 S.Ct. 535 , 145 L.Ed.2d 414 (1999).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Vick v. Williams
See also State v. Adams, 132 N.C.App. 819 , 513 S.E.2d 588 (N.C.App.1999), cert. denied, 528 U.S. 1022 , 120 S.Ct. 534 , 145 L.Ed.2d 414 (1999) (federal appellate decisions such as Lynn are not binding upon the North Carolina courts); Milligan v. North Carolina, 135 N.C.App. 781 , 522 S.E.2d 330 , 331 n. 2 (N.C.App.1999) (expressly declining to be bound by Lynn because it is not a decision of the United States Supreme Court).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Anderson
v.
United States
v.
United States
No. 99-712.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Nov 29, 1999.
Published
C. A. Armed Forces. Certiorari denied.