discussed Cited "see" Brooks v. State See Jenkins , supra. As the Illinois Supreme Court stated in People v. Barrow , 195 Ill.2d 506 , 749 N.E.2d 892 , 255 Ill.Dec. 410 (2001), cert. denied, Barrow v. Wells , 534 U.S. 1067 , 122 S.Ct. 669 , 151 L.Ed.2d 583 (2001): "The defendant contends that the State violated Brady by failing to disclose to the defense all the evidence described above, and that a new trial is therefore warranted.

discussed Cited "see, e.g." State v. Lishan Wang This court previously has held that, under Harper and Riggins , the state must demonstrate, "to a reasonable degree of medical certainty, [that] involuntary medication of the defendant will render him competent to stand trial...." (Footnotes omitted.) State v. Garcia, supra, 233 Conn. at 84 -85 , 658 A.2d 947 ; see also United States v. Weston, 134 F.Supp.2d 115 , 132 (D.D.C.) (applying Harper and Riggins and concluding that, "[a]lthough ... it is not certain that the medication will restore [the defendant's] competency, the [c]ourt credits the ... testimony of the mental health experts that t…

discussed Cited "see, e.g." Linda James v. McDonald Corporation, Simon Marketing, Incorporated, and Ante Enterprises Llc, Doing Business as McDonald Restaurant (2×) Rev. 1237 , 1253 (2001); see also Brown v. Wheat First Sec., Inc., 257 F.3d 821, 825 (D.C.Cir.), cert. denied, 534 U.S. 1067 , 122 S.Ct. 668 , 151 L.Ed.2d 582 (2001) (declining to extend to non-statutory claims a prior holding prohibiting an employer from requiring an employee to arbitrate all disputes relating to the employment relationship as a condition of employment and also to require the employee to bear all or part of the costs of arbitration).