BE&K Constr. Co. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd., 534 U.S. 1074 (2002). · Go Syfert
Search
BE&K Constr. Co. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd., 534 U.S. 1074 (2002). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
11 citation events (11 in the last 25 years) across 1 distinct court.
Strongest positive: BE&K Constr. Co. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd., 536 U.S. 516 (2002)
How cited ↗
Cited for
q1 “may impose liability on an employer for filing a losing retaliatory lawsuit, even if the employer could show the suit was not objectively baseless”1 citing case1 citing court quotes it
  • BE&K Constr. Co. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd., 536 U.S. 516 (2002).published 2 cites
    (granting certiorari on whether the Board "may impose liability on an employer for filing a losing retaliatory lawsuit, even if the employer could show the suit was not objectively baseless" (emphasis added))
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
BE&K Construction Co.
v.
National Labor Relations Board
No. 01-518.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jan 4, 2002.
Published opinion
534 U.S. 1074
2002 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 154
2002 U.S. LEXIS 6
Cited by 1 opinion  |  Published

C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari granted limited to the following question: “Did the Court of Appeals.err in holding that under Bill Johnson’s Restaurants, Inc. v. NLRB, 461 U. S. 731 (1983), the NLRB may impose liability on an employer for filing a losing retaliatory lawsuit, even if the employer could show the suit was not objectively baseless under Professional Real Estate Investors, Inc. v. Columbia Pictures Industries, Inc., 508 U.S. 49 (1993)?”