BE&K Constr. Co. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd., 534 U.S. 1074 (2002). · Go Syfert
Search
BE&K Constr. Co. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd., 534 U.S. 1074 (2002). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
16 citation events (16 in the last 25 years) across 3 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: BE&K Construction Co. v. National Labor Relations Board (scotus, 2002-06-24)
Top citers, strongest first. 1 distinct citer. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see" BE&K Construction Co. v. National Labor Relations Board (2×)
SCOTUS · 2002 · signal: see · confidence high
See 534 U. S. 1074 (2002) (granting certiorari on whether the Board “may impose liability on an employer for filing a losing retaliatory lawsuit, even if the employer could show the suit was not objectively baseless” (emphasis added)). > In the context of employer-filed lawsuits, we previously indicated that retaliatory suits are those “filed in retaliation for the exercise of the employees’ [NLRA] §7 rights.” Bill Johnson’s, 461 U. S., at 747 .
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
BE&K Construction Co.
v.
National Labor Relations Board
No. 01-518.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jan 4, 2002.
534 U.S. 1074
Cited by 1 opinion  |  Published

C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari granted limited to the following question: “Did the Court of Appeals.err in holding that under Bill Johnson’s Restaurants, Inc. v. NLRB, 461 U. S. 731 (1983), the NLRB may impose liability on an employer for filing a losing retaliatory lawsuit, even if the employer could show the suit was not objectively baseless under Professional Real Estate Investors, Inc. v. Columbia Pictures Industries, Inc., 508 U.S. 49 (1993)?”