green
Positive treatment
3.6 score
Treatment trajectory · 1996 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1996
2011
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 6 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
Dawud Majid Mu'min v. Samuel v. Pruett, Warden, Mecklenburg Correctional Center
Mu’Min relies on Simmons v. South Carolina, 512 U.S. 154 , 114 S.Ct. 2187 , 129 L.Ed.2d 133 (1994), in which the Supreme Court held that when “the State puts the defendant’s future dangerousness in issue, and the only available alternative sentence to death is life imprisonment without possibility of parole, due process entitles the defendant to inform the capital sentencing jury — by either argument or instruction— that he is parole ineligible.” Id. at 178 , 114 S.Ct. at 2201 (O’Connor, J., concurring in the judgment); see Townes v. Murray, 68 F.3d 840, 849-50 (4th Cir.1995) (re…
discussed
Cited "see"
Mu'Min v. Pruett
Mu'Min relies on Simmons v. South Carolina, 512 U.S. 154 (1994), in which the Supreme Court held that when "the State puts the defen- dant's future dangerousness in issue, and the only available alterna- tive sentence to death is life imprisonment without possibility of parole, due process entitles the defendant to inform the capital sen- tencing jury--by either argument or instruction--that he is parole ineligible." Id. at 178 (O'Connor, J., concurring in the judgment); see Townes v. Murray, 68 F.3d 840, 849-50 (4th Cir. 1995) (recognizing Justice O'Connor's statement as setting forth the hol…
discussed
Cited "see"
Mu'min v. Pruett
Mu'Min relies on Simmons v. South Carolina, 512 U.S. 154 (1994), in which the Supreme Court held that when "the State puts the defen- dant's future dangerousness in issue, and the only available alterna- tive sentence to death is life imprisonment without possibility of parole, due process entitles the defendant to inform the capital sen- tencing jury--by either argument or instruction--that he is parole ineligible." Id. at 178 (O'Connor, J., concurring in the judgment); see Townes v. Murray, 68 F.3d 840, 849-50 (4th Cir. 1995) (recognizing Justice O'Connor's statement as setting forth the hol…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Michael D. Clagett v. Ronald Angelone, Director of the Virginia Department of Corrections
(2×)
Id. at 161-62 , 114 S.Ct. 2187 ; see also Townes v. Murray, 68 F.3d 840, 851 (4th Cir.1995) (explaining that Simmons holds “only that, when the state puts a capital defendant’s future dangerousness in issue, the trial court may not both refuse a defendant’s request that it instruct the jury on his parole ineligibility and prevent defendant from arguing that same point to the jury”), cert. denied, 516 U.S. 1100 , 116 S.Ct. 831 , 133 L.Ed.2d 830 (1996).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Matthews v. Evatt
Picard v. Connor, 404 U.S. 270, 275-78 , 92 S.Ct. 509, 512-14 , 30 L.Ed.2d 438 (1971); see also Townes v. Murray, 68 F.3d 840, 846 (4th Cir.1995), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 116 S.Ct. 831 , 133 L.Ed.2d 830 (1996).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Matthews v. Evatt
Picard v. Connor, 404 U.S. 270, 275-78 , 92 S.Ct. 509, 512-14 , 30 L.Ed.2d 438 (1971); see also Townes v. Murray, 68 F.3d 840, 846 (4th Cir.1995), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 116 S.Ct. 831 , 133 L.Ed.2d 830 (1996).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Townes
v.
Virginia
v.
Virginia
No. 95-7512 (A-598).
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jan 23, 1996.
Application, Execution, Grant, Stay, Stevens.
Cited by 1 opinion | Published
Sup. Ct. Va. Application for stay of execution of sentence of death, presented to The Chief Justice, and by him referred to the Court, denied. Certiorari denied.
Justice Stevens and Justice Ginsburg would grant the application for stay of execution.