Lopez v. Monterey Cnty., 516 U.S. 1104 (1996). · Go Syfert
Search
Lopez v. Monterey Cnty., 516 U.S. 1104 (1996). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
13 citation events (3 in the last 25 years) across 6 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Hale v. United States Department of Justice (ca10, 1996-11-06)
Top citers, strongest first. 3 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see" Hale v. United States Department of Justice
10th Cir. · 1996 · signal: see · confidence high
See Rosenfeld v. United States Dep’t. of Justice, 57 F.3d 803, 814 (9th Cir. 1995) (“Landano did not affect the application of exemption 7(D) to sources and information covered by an express assurance of confidentiality.”), cert. dismissed, — U.S. -, 116 S.Ct. 833 , 133 L.Ed.2d 832 (1996).
discussed Cited "see" Boyne v. Politis
9th Cir. · 1996 · signal: see · confidence high
See Rosenfeld v. United States Dep't of Justice, 57 F.3d 803, 811 (9th Cir.1995), cert. denied, 116 S.Ct. 833 (1996); Barber v. Hawaii, 42 F.3d 1185, 1198 (9th Cir.1994). 5 Boyne also contends that the district court erred by dismissing his claims against Arizona prison officials for failure to state a claim.
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Steven SCHIFFER, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. the FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION; United States Department of Justice, Defendants-Appellants
9th Cir. · 1996 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., Rosenfeld v. United States Dept. of Justice, 57 F.3d 803, 807 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 116 S.Ct. 833 , 133 L.Ed.2d 832 (1995); National Wildlife Federation v. United States Forest Service, 861 F.2d 1114, 1116 (9th Cir.1988); Lewis v. IRS, 823 F.2d 375, 378 (9th Cir.1987).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Lopez
v.
Monterey County, California
No. A-606 (95-1201).
Supreme Court of the United States.
Feb 1, 1996.
516 U.S. 1104
Cited by 9 opinions  |  Published

Appeal from D. C. N. D. Cal. Application for stay of modification of an injunction filed November 1, 1995, by the United States District Court for the Northern District of California, case No. C-91-20559-RMW, presented to Justice O’Connor, and by her referred to the Court, granted pending action by this Court on the statement as to jurisdiction. Should the appeal be dismissed or the judgment affirmed, this order shall terminate automatically. If probable jurisdiction is noted or postponed, this order shall continue in effect pending the sending down of the judgment of this Court.