James v. Cain, 516 U.S. 1155 (1996). · Go Syfert
James v. Cain, 516 U.S. 1155 (1996). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
19 citation events (11 in the last 25 years) across 6 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Center for Bio-Ethical Reform, Inc. v. City and County of Honolulu (ca9, 2006-07-06)
Top citers, strongest first. 7 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see" Center for Bio-Ethical Reform, Inc. v. City and County of Honolulu
9th Cir. · 2006 · signal: see · confidence high
See U.S. West, Inc. v. United States, 48 F.3d 1092 , 1101 (9th Cir.1994) (stating that "`failed legislative proposals' and [accompanying] recommendations in committee reports . . . . [are not] sufficient evidence to suggest that there is any relevant congressional intent to which this court could defer."), judgment vacated on other grounds, 516 U.S. 1155 , 116 S.Ct. 1037 , 134 L.Ed.2d 186 (1996).
discussed Cited "see" Center for Bio-Ethical Reform, Inc. v. City & County of Honolulu
9th Cir. · 2006 · signal: see · confidence high
See U.S. West, Inc. v. United States, 48 F.3d 1092 , 1101 (9th Cir.1994) (stating that “ ‘failed legislative proposals’ and [accompanying] recommendations in committee reports .... [are not] sufficient evidence to suggest that there is any relevant congressional intent to which this court could defer.”), judgment vacated on other grounds, 516 U.S. 1155 , 116 S.Ct. 1037 , 134 L.Ed.2d 186 (1996).
discussed Cited "see" Center for Bio-Ethical Reform, Inc. v. City and County of Honolulu
9th Cir. · 2006 · signal: see · confidence high
See U.S. West, Inc. v. United States, 48 F.3d 1092 , 1101 (9th Cir.1994) (stating that "`failed legislative proposals' and [accompanying] recommendations in committee reports .... [are not] sufficient evidence to suggest that there is any relevant congressional intent to which this court could defer."), judgment vacated on other grounds, 516 U.S. 1155 , 116 S.Ct. 1037 , 134 L.Ed.2d 186 (1996).
discussed Cited "see" Center for Bio-Eth v. Honolulu
9th Cir. · 2006 · signal: see · confidence high
See US West, Inc. v. United States, 48 F.3d 1092, 1101 (9th Cir. 1994) (stating that “ ‘failed legislative proposals’ and [accompanying] recom- mendations in committee reports . . . . [are not] sufficient evi- dence to suggest that there is any relevant congressional intent to which this court could defer.”), judgment vacated on other grounds, 516 U.S. 1155 (1996).
discussed Cited "see" Ngo v. Reno Hilton Resort Corp.
9th Cir. · 1998 · signal: see · confidence high
See Barbour v. Merrill, 48 F.3d 1270, 1277 (D.C.Cir.1995)(explaining that “evidence that suffices to establish an intentional violation of protected civil rights also may suffice to permit the jury to award punitive damages, provided the jury, in its ‘discretionary moral judgment,’ finds that the conduct merits a punitive award”)(citing Wade, 461 U.S. at 52 , 103 S.Ct. at 1637-38 ), cert. granted 516 U.S. 1086 , 116 S.Ct. 805 , 133 L.Ed.2d 752 and cert. dismissed 516 U.S. 1155 , 116 S.Ct. 1037 , 134 L.Ed.2d 113 (1996); Rowlett v. Anheuser-Busch, Inc., 832 F.2d 194, 205-06 (1st Cir.1987…
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Mazloum v. District of Columbia
D.D.C. · 2006 · signal: see also · confidence low
See Griffin v. Breckenridge, 403 U.S. 88, 102-03 , 91 S.Ct. 1790 , 29 L.Ed.2d 338 (1971); see also Barbour v. Merrill, 48 F.3d 1270, 1280 (D.C.Cir.1995) (§ 1985(3) is violated whenever two or more persons conspire “to deprive [a person] of the equal protection of the laws or of equal privileges and immunities under the laws”), cert. dismissed, 516 U.S. 1155 , 116 S.Ct. 1037 , 134 L.Ed.2d 113 (1996).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Morse v. Republican Party of Virginia (2×)
SCOTUS · 1996 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also Arizona v. Reno, 887 F. Supp. 318 (DDC), appeal dism'd, 516 U. S. 1155 (1996).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
James
v.
Cain, Warden
No. A-723.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Feb 29, 1996.
516 U.S. 1155
Published

Application for stay of execution of sentence of death, presented to Justice Scalia, and by him referred to the Court, denied.