green
Positive treatment
1.6 score
Top citers, strongest first. 2 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
Bates v. United Parcel Service, Inc.
See Coeur D’Alene Tribe v. Hammond, 384 F.3d 674 , 692 (9th Cir.2004) (providing that we may consult legislative history if a statutory provision is ambiguous), cert. denied, 543 U.S. 1187 , 125 S.Ct. 1397 , 161 L.Ed.2d 190 (2005).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Johnson
Jury impartiality As to the first issue, the Court reiterated that “due process alone has long demanded that, if a jury is to be provided the defendant, regardless of whether the Sixth Amendment requires it, the jury must stand impartial and indifferent to the extent commanded by the Sixth Amendment.” Id. at 727 , 112 S.Ct. 2222 ; see also Brown v. Luebbers, 344 F.3d 770, 781 (8th Cir.2003) (citing Morgan, 504 U.S. at 727 , 112 S.Ct. 2222 , as clearly establishing federal law that “ ‘the right to jury trial guarantees to the criminally accused a fair trial by a panel of impartial, “i…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Wagnon, Secretary, Kansas Department of Revenue
v.
Prairie Band Potawatomi Nation
v.
Prairie Band Potawatomi Nation
No. 04-631.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Feb 28, 2005.
Published
C. A. 10th Cir. Certiorari granted.