Loyal Am. Life Ins. v. Mattiace, 519 U.S. 949 (1996). · Go Syfert
Search
Loyal Am. Life Ins. v. Mattiace, 519 U.S. 949 (1996). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
G Cite
cited 6× by 3 distinct cases · "Claimants have no right to a jury in admiralty actions, and thus lose their right to pursue common law remedies before a jury when forced into admiralty court under the Limitation Act."
27 citation events (10 in the last 25 years) across 18 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: In Re the Complaint of J.A.R. Barge Lines, L.P. (pawd, 2004-01-22)
Treatment trajectory · 1996 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1996 2011 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 2 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited as authority (quoted) In Re the Complaint of J.A.R. Barge Lines, L.P.
W.D. Pa. · 2004 · quote attribution · 1 verbatim quote · confidence low
claimants have no right to a jury in admiralty actions, and thus lose their right to pursue common law remedies before a jury when forced into admiralty court under the limitation act.
discussed Cited "see" In Re Lake Michigan Trans-Lake Shortcut, Inc.
E.D. Wis. · 1999 · signal: see · confidence high
See Complaint of McCarthy Brothers Co./Clark Bridge, 83 F.3d 821, 826 (7th Cir.), cert. denied sub nom., Campbell v. McCarthy Brothers Co./Clark Bridge, — U.S. -, 117 S.Ct. 361 , 136 L.Ed.2d 253 (1996).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Loyal American Life Insurance Co., Inc.
v.
Mattiace
No. 96-308.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 21, 1996.
519 U.S. 949
Published
1 passage pin-cited by 1 case
Pinpoint authority: bottom 65%
Citer courts: W.D. Pennsylvania (1)

Sup. Ct. Ala. Certiorari denied.