green
Positive treatment
1.4 score
Top citers, strongest first. 3 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
cited
Cited "see"
ABC, INC. v. PrimeTime 24, Joint Venture
See Sara Lee Corp. v. Kayser-Roth Corp., 81 F.3d 455, 461 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, -U.S. -, 117 S.Ct. 412 , 136 L.Ed.2d 325 (1996).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
B.A.M. Development, L.L.C. v. Salt Lake County
See also Amoco Oil Co. v. Village of Schaumburg, 277 Ill.App.3d 926 , 214 Ill.Dec. 526 , 661 N.E.2d 380, 390 (1995) ("[A] municipality should not be able to insulate itself from a takings challenge merely by utilizing a different bureaucratic vehicle when expropriating its citizen's property."), cert. denied, 519 U.S. 976 , 117 S.Ct. 413 , 136 L.Ed.2d 325 (1996); McClure v. City of Springfield, 175 Or.App. 425 , 28 P.3d 1222, 1224 (2001) (noting parties' stipulation that "the city's enactment of dedication requirements as an ordinance did not relieve it of the obligation to make particularized…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Harley-Davidson, Inc. v. Estate of O'Connell
See, e.g., Sara Lee Corp. v. Kayser-Roth Corp., 81 F.3d 455, 462 (4th Cir.1996), ce rt. denied, Kayser-Roth Corp. v. Sara Lee Corp., — U.S.-, 117 S.Ct. 412 , 136 L.Ed.2d 325 (1996) (‘“The defense of laches is trumped by a strong showing of likely confusion of the public.’ ” quoting 4 J.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Kayser-Roth Corp.
v.
Sara Lee Corp.
v.
Sara Lee Corp.
No. 96-321.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Nov 4, 1996.
Consideration, Took.
Cited by 1 opinion | Published
C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.
Justice O’Connor took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.