green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 2×
10.4 score
“our duty on appeal is to review the record in the light most favorable to the prevailing theory and to sustain that theory if it is supported by competent, substantial evidence.”
Treatment trajectory · 1996 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1996
2011
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 40 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Waldrop v. State
trial judges are presumed to know the law and to follow it
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Willacy v. State
our duty on appeal is to review the record in the light most favorable to the prevailing theory and to sustain that theory if it is supported by competent, substantial evidence.
discussed
Cited "see"
Scheuing v. State
See Slaton v. State, 680 So.2d 879, 906-07 (Ala.Crim.App.1995), aff'd, 680 So.2d 909 (Ala.1996), cert. denied, 519 U.S. 1079 , 117 S.Ct. 742 , 136 L.Ed.2d 680 (1997).’ Burgess v. State, 723 So.2d [742] at 754 [ (Ala.Crim.App.1997) ].” Johnson, 120 So.3d at 1190 .
cited
Cited "see"
Reynolds v. State
See Slaton v. State, 680 So.2d 879, 907 (Ala.Crim.App.1995), aff'd, 680 So.2d 909 (Ala.1996), cert. denied, 519 U.S. 1079 , 117 S.Ct. 742 , 136 L.Ed.2d 680 (1997).
discussed
Cited "see"
Johnson v. State
See Slaton v. State, 680 So.2d 879, 906-07 (Ala.Cr.App.1995), aff'd, 680 So.2d 909 (Ala.1996), cert. denied, 519 U.S. 1079 , 117 S.Ct. 742 , 136 L.Ed.2d 680 (1997).” Burgess v. State, 723 So.2d at 754.
cited
Cited "see"
Pilley v. State
See Slaton v. State , 680 So.2d 879 , 907 (Ala.Crim.App. 1995), aff'd, 680 So.2d 909 (Ala. 1996), cert. denied, 519 U.S. 1079 , 117 S.Ct. 742 , 136 L.Ed.2d 680 (1997).
cited
Cited "see"
Pilley v. State
See Slaton v. State, 680 So.2d 879, 907 (Ala.Crim.App.1995), aff'd, 680 So.2d 909 (Ala.1996), cert. denied, 519 U.S. 1079 , 117 S.Ct. 742 , 136 L.Ed.2d 680 (1997).
discussed
Cited "see"
Dorsey v. State
See Ex parte Slaton, 680 So.2d 909 (Ala.1996), cert. denied, 519 U.S. 1079 , 117 S.Ct. 742 , 136 L.Ed.2d 680 (1997); Wilson v. State, 777 So.2d 856 (Ala.Crim.App.1999), aff'd, 777 So.2d 935 (Ala.2000), cert. denied, 531 U.S. 1097 , 121 S.Ct. 826 , 148 L.Ed.2d 709 (2001); Smith v. State, 756 So.2d 892 (Ala.Crim.App.1998), aff'd, 756 So.2d 957 (Ala.), cert. denied, 531 U.S. 830 , 121 S.Ct. 82 , 148 L.Ed.2d 44 (2000); Freeman v. State, 722 So.2d 806 (Ala.Crim.App.1998).
cited
Cited "see"
Oken v. State
See Oken v. State, 343 Md. 256 , 681 A.2d 30 (1996), cert. denied, 519 U.S. 1079 , 117 S.Ct. 742 , 136 L.Ed.2d 681 (1997) (Oken II).
cited
Cited "see"
Oken v. Warden, MSP
See Oken v. State, 343 Md. 256 , 681 A.2d 30, 49-51 (1996), cert. denied, 519 U.S. 1079 , 117 S.Ct. 742 , 136 L.Ed.2d 681 (1997).
cited
Cited "see"
Oken v. Corcoran
See Oken v. State, 343 Md. 256 , 681 A.2d 30, 53 (1996) (“Oken II”), c ert. denied, 519 U.S. 1079 , 117 S.Ct. 742 , 136 L.Ed.2d 681 (1997).
discussed
Cited "see"
Perkins v. State
(2×)
also: Cited "see, e.g."
See Ex parte Slaton, 680 So.2d 909, 918 (Ala.1996), cert. denied, 519 U.S. 1079 , 117 S.Ct. 742 , 136 L.Ed.2d 680 (1997)(although each link in the chain of custody must be identified, it is not necessary that each link actually testify in order to prove a complete chain of custody).
discussed
Cited "see"
Thomas v. State
(2×)
also: Cited "see, e.g."
See Ex parte Slaton, 680 So.2d 909, 924 (Ala.1996) (in regard to the appellant's argument that the trial court's failure to list in its sentencing order all the nonstatutory items he offered in mitigation, including his family background, was indicative of the court's failure to consider all nonstatutory mitigation, the Alabama Supreme Court proclaimed, "There is no requirement that a trial court list in its sentencing order all nonstatutory mitigation offered."), cert. denied, 519 U.S. 1079 , 117 S.Ct. 742 , 136 L.Ed.2d 680 (1997).
cited
Cited "see"
Oren v. State
See Oken v. State, 343 Md. 256 , 681 A.2d 30, 49-51 (1996), cert. denied, — U.S.-, 117 S.Ct. 742 , 136 L.Ed.2d 681 (1997). .
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Bryan K. Kaluna
(2×)
See United States v. Ajugwo, 82 F.3d 925, 929 (9th Cir.1996), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 117 S.Ct. 742 , 136 L.Ed.2d 680 (1997). 14 The safety-valve provision, however, is easily distinguished, from the mandatory lifetime provision of the three-strikes statute.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Danilo A. Delacruz
See United States v. Ajugwo, 82 F.3d 925, 929 (9th Cir.1996), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 117 S.Ct. 742 , 136 L.Ed.2d 680 (1997); U.S.S.G. § 5C1.2(5) (1995). 7 Here, Delacruz provided only the first names of his ice suppliers even though he purchased from them over an eight-month period.
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Levon Misirli, AKA Levon Misirlian
See United States v. Ajugwo, 82 F.3d 925, 929 (9th Cir.1996), cert. denied, --- U.S. ---, 117 S.Ct. 742 (1997).
discussed
Cited "see"
McKesson Drug Co. v. Williams
See Orme v. State, 677 So.2d 258 (Fla.1996) (affirming conviction in death penalty case because state's theory of defendant's mental status was supported by competent and substantial evidence, even though there was conflicting evidence), cert. denied, ___ U.S. ___, 117 S.Ct. 742 , 136 L.Ed.2d 680 (1997).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Jeffrey Trotter
See United States v. Ajugwo, 82 F.3d 925, 929 (9th Cir.1996), cert. denied, 117 S.Ct. 742 (1997).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Francisco Alvarez
See United States v. Ajugwo, 82 F.3d 925, 929 (9th Cir.1996), cert. denied, 117 S.Ct. 742 (1997).
discussed
Cited "see"
Ball v. State
See Oken v. State, 343 Md. 256, 290 , 681 A.2d 30, 47 (1996), cert. denied, - U.S. -, 117 S.Ct. 742 , 136 L.Ed.2d 681 *205 (finding that defense counsel's decision to present evidence, through expert testimony, that defendant suffered from mental disorder of sexual sadism in the hope that it would convince jury not to impose death penalty was valid trial strategy).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Jesus Maria Fernandez
See United States v. Ajugwo, 82 F.3d 925, 929 (9th Cir.1996) (permitting district court to consider information learned from other sources which indicated that defendant had been less than forthcoming), cert. denied, 117 S.Ct. 742 (1997).
cited
Cited "see"
Burgess v. State
See Slaton v. State , 680 So.2d 879 , 906-07 (Ala.Cr.App. 1996), aff'd , 680 So.2d 909 (Ala. 1996), cert. denied , ___ U.S. ___, 117 S.Ct. 742 , 136 L.Ed.2d 680 (1997).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Miguel Angel Cortes
See United States v. Ajugwo, 82 F.3d 925, 929 (9th Cir.1996) (assertion that defendant told Government all s/he knows is insufficient when other information indicates defendant has withheld information), cert. denied, 117 S.Ct. 742 (1997).
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Kenneth O'Guinn
See O’Guinn v. Dutton, 88 F.3d 140 9 (6th Cir. 1996), cert. denied, 117 S. Ct. 742 (1997).
discussed
Cited "see"
Trepal v. State
See generally Orme v. State, 677 So.2d 258, 262 (Fla.1996)("Our duty on appeal is to review the record in the light most favorable to the prevailing theory and to sustain that theory if it is supported by competent substantial evidence."), cert. denied, ___ U.S. ___, 117 S.Ct. 742 , 136 L.Ed.2d 680 (1997).
discussed
Cited "see"
Bryan v. Butterworth
See Orme v. State, 677 So.2d 258, 262 (Fla. 1996) ("Our duty on appeal is to review the record in the light most favorable to the prevailing theory and to sustain that theory if it is supported by competent substantial evidence."), cert. denied, ___ U.S. ___, 117 S.Ct. 742 , 136 L.Ed.2d 680 (1997).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Thaniel
See , e.g. , Oken v. State , 343 Md. 256 , 283, 681 A.2d 30 (1996) (observing that a postconviction petitioner must "overcome the presumption that the challenged action might, under the circumstances, be considered sound trial strategy"), cert. denied , 519 U.S. 1079 , 117 S.Ct. 742 , 136 L.Ed.2d 681 (1997) ; Robinson v. State , 410 Md. 91 , 104, 111, 976 A.2d 1072 (2009) (declining to apply plain error review to unpreserved claim of public trial violation "under circumstances suggesting that the lack of objection might have been strategic, rather than inadvertent").
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Berget
See, e.g., Ex parte Slaton, 680 So.2d 909, 922-23 (Ala.1996), cer t. denied, 519 U.S. 1079 , 117 S.Ct. 742 , 136 L.Ed.2d 680 (1997); People v. Lewis, 33 Cal.4th 214 , 14 Cal.Rptr.3d 566 , 91 P.3d 928, 937 (2004), cert. denied, 543 U.S. 1178 , 125 S.Ct. 1308 , 161 L.Ed.2d 163 (2005); Crump v. State, 654 So.2d 545, 548 (Fla.1995) (per curiam). .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Adams
(2×)
See, e.g., Oken v. State, 343 Md. 256 , 681 A.2d 30 (1996), cert. denied, 519 U.S. 1079 , 117 S.Ct. 742 , 136 L.Ed.2d 681 (1997); Davis v. State, 285 Md. 19 , 400 A.2d 406 (1979).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Miller v. State
See § 13A-5-46(e)(1)-(3), Ala.Code 1975; see also Ex parte Slaton, 680 So.2d 909, 927 (Ala.1996), cert. denied, 519 U.S. 1079 , 117 S.Ct. 742 , 136 L.Ed.2d 680 (1997); Duke v. State, 889 So.2d 1 , opinion on return to remand, 889 So.2d 40 (Ala.Crim.App.2002).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Duke v. State
See § 13A-5-46(e)(1)-(3), Ala.Code 1975; see also Ex parte Slaton, 680 So.2d 909, 927 (Ala.1996), cert. denied, 519 U.S. 1079 , 117 S.Ct. 742 , 136 L.Ed.2d 680 (1997).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Duke v. State
See § 13A-5-46(e)(l)-(3), Ala. Code 1975; see also Ex parte Slaton, 680 So.2d 909, 927 (Ala.1996), cert. denied, 519 U.S. 1079 , 117 S.Ct. 742 , 136 L.Ed.2d 680 (1997).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Borchardt v. State
(2×)
See also Oken v. State, 343 Md. 256, 268-77 , 681 A.2d 30, 36-40 (1996), cert. denied, 519 U.S. 1079 , 117 S.Ct. 742 , 136 L.Ed.2d 681 (1997).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Broadnax v. State
See also Ex parte Slaton, 680 So.2d 909 (Ala.1996), cert. denied, 519 U.S. 1079 , 117 S.Ct. 742 , 136 L.Ed.2d 680 (1997).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Burgess v. State
See also Slaton v. State, 680 So.2d 879, 906 (Ala.Cr.App.1995), aff'd, 680 So.2d 909 (Ala.1996), cert. denied, 519 U.S. 1079 , 117 S.Ct. 742 , 136 L.Ed.2d 680 (1997).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Hudson v. State
See also Orme v. State, 677 So.2d 258 (Fla.1996), cert. denied, ___ U.S. ___, 117 S.Ct. 742 , 136 L.Ed.2d 680 (1997).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Price v. State
See also Ex parte Slaton, 680 So.2d 909, 920-21 (Ala. 1996), cert. denied, ___ U.S. ___, 117 S.Ct. 742 , 136 L.Ed.2d 680 (1997) (the Alabama Supreme Court found no error in the appellant's claim that the trial court's reference to the term "moral certainty" during the guilt phase and then again subsequently during the sentencing phase constituted reversible error).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Travis v. State
See also, Ex parte Slaton, 680 So.2d 909 (Ala.1996), cert. denied, 519 U.S. 1079 , 117 S.Ct. 742 , 136 L.Ed.2d 680 (1997); Ex parte Hunt, 659 So.2d 960 (Ala. 1995), cert. denied, 516 U.S. 880 , 116 S.Ct. 215 , 133 L.Ed.2d 146 (1995); Boyd v. State 715 So.2d 825 (Ala.Cr.App.1997).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Loewe
v.
Rogers
v.
Rogers
No. 96-6117.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jan 13, 1997.
C. A. 8th Cir. Certiorari denied.