Holland v. United States, 519 U.S. 1131 (1997). · Go Syfert
Search
Holland v. United States, 519 U.S. 1131 (1997). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
G Cite
cited 4× by 1 distinct case · “there is no statutory . . . [or] common-law . . . right to allocution in a capital case”
41 citation events (19 in the last 25 years) across 11 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: State v. Colon (conn, 2004-12-28)
Treatment trajectory · 1997 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1997 2011 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 5 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited as authority (quoted) State v. Colon
Conn. · 2004 · quote attribution · 1 verbatim quote · confidence low
there is no statutory . . . common-law . . . right to allocution in a capital case
discussed Cited "see" Hayes v. Waltz
N.C. Ct. App. · 2016 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. Bates, 343 N.C. 564 , 590, 473 S.E.2d 269 , 283 (1996) ("Counsel is permitted to argue the facts which have been presented, as well as reasonable inferences which can be drawn therefrom."), cert. denied, 519 U.S. 1131 , 117 S.Ct. 992 , 136 L.Ed.2d 873 (1997). *451 After carefully reviewing the remaining challenged statements from Plaintiff's closing argument, we have found no remark that required the trial court to grant Defendant relief from judgment under Rule 60(b) or a new trial pursuant to Rule 59.
discussed Cited "see, e.g." State v. Locklear
N.C. Ct. App. · 2001 · signal: see also · confidence low
Ed. 2d 782 (1991); see also State v. Bates, 343 N.C. 564 , 473 S.E.2d 269 (1996) (implicitly approving the trial court’s denial of the defendant’s motion for a rehearing on his motion to suppress prior to the second trial because the defendant failed to show additional pertinent facts, discovered since the first hearing, which could not have been discovered with reasonable diligence prior to the first hearing), cert. denied, 519 U.S. 1131 , 136 L.
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Young v. State
Okla. Crim. App. · 2000 · signal: see also · confidence low
Id.; see also Duckett v. State, 1995 OK CR 61, ¶ 73 , 919 P.2d 7, 24 , cert. denied, 519 U.S. 1131 , 117 S.Ct. 991 , 136 L.Ed.2d 872 (1997). ¶ 70 The State concedes the requirements of Brewer were not met, but contends Appellant was not prefudiced and any error was harmless.
discussed Cited "see, e.g." United States v. Gaines
1st Cir. · 1999 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., United States v. Elder, 90 F.3d 1110, 1134 (6th Cir.1996), cert. denied, 519 U.S. 1131 , 117 S.Ct. 993 , 136 L.Ed.2d 873 (1997); United States v. Flores, 63 F.3d 1342, 1359 (5th Cir.1995); United States v. Sautter, 60 F.3d 270, 276 (7th Cir.1995); United States v. DePeri, 778 F.2d 963 , 977 (3d Cir.1985), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1110 , 106 S.Ct. 1518 , 89 L.Ed.2d 916 (1986).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Holland
v.
United States
No. 96-7174.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Feb 18, 1997.
519 U.S. 1131
Published
1 passage pin-cited by 1 case
Pinpoint authority: bottom 63%
Citer courts: Supreme Court of Connecticut (1)

C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied.