Wrenn v. Freeman, 519 U.S. 1136 (1997). · Go Syfert
Search
Wrenn v. Freeman, 519 U.S. 1136 (1997). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
“wjhile no party is permitted to put on testimony that it knows or should know to be untrue, it is not improper to put on a witness whose testimony may be impeached”
23 citation events (6 in the last 25 years) across 2 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: United States v. Catherine Papajohn (ca8, 2000-06-13)
Treatment trajectory · 1997 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1997 2011 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 5 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited as authority (quoted) United States v. Catherine Papajohn
8th Cir. · 2000 · signal: see · quote attribution · 1 verbatim quote · confidence high
wjhile no party is permitted to put on testimony that it knows or should know to be untrue, it is not improper to put on a witness whose testimony may be impeached
cited Cited "see" United States v. Terry R. Stamps
8th Cir. · 2003 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Perkins, 94 F.3d 429, 437 (8th Cir.1996), cert. denied, 519 U.S. 1136 , 117 S.Ct. 1004 , 136 L.Ed.2d 882 (1997).
cited Cited "see" United States v. Stephen Jones
8th Cir. · 1998 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Perkins, 94 F.3d 429, 435-36 (8th Cir. 1996), cert. denied, 117 S. Ct. 1004 (1997).
discussed Cited "see" United States v. Saborit (2×)
N.D. Iowa · 1997 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Perkins, 94 F.3d 429, 436 (8th Cir.1996) (“ ‘[t]he standard of review of an appeal concerning the sufficiency of the evidence is very strict, and the verdict of the jury should not be overturned lightly.’ ”) (quoting Burks, 934 F.2d at 151 ), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 117 S.Ct. 1004 , 136 L.Ed.2d 882 (1997); United States v. Easley, 70 F.3d 65, 67 (8th Cir.1995) (“The standard of review for a claim of insufficient evidence is very strict and the verdict of a jury should not be overturned lightly.”), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 116 S.Ct. 1338 , 134 L.Ed.2d 488 (19…
discussed Cited "see" United States v. Herman L. Abrams
8th Cir. · 1997 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Perkins, 94 F.3d 429, 435-36 (8th Cir.1996) (stating “we have never found it to be plain error when a court does not give a limiting instruction of any kind sua sponte with respect to Rule 404(b) type evidence”), cert. denied, - U.S. -, 117 S.Ct. 1004 , 136 L.Ed.2d 882 , (1997); United States v. McGuire, 45 F.3d 1177, 1188 (8th Cir.) (stating court need not issue prior crimes limiting instruction sua sponte), cert. denied, - U.S.-, 115 S.Ct. 2558 , 132 L.Ed.2d 811 (1995).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Wrenn
v.
Freeman, Secretary, North Carolina Department of Correction
No. 96-7373.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Feb 18, 1997.
519 U.S. 1136
Published
1 passage pin-cited by 1 case
Pinpoint authority: bottom 73%
Citer courts: Eighth Circuit (1)

C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.