green
Positive treatment
4.5 score
Treatment trajectory · 1984 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1984
2005
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 9 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Edward Lee Baker, AKA \Eddie\"
See United States v. Franklin, 704 F.2d 1183, 1190-92 (10th Cir.) (where government witness was undisclosed in violation of pretrial discovery order, exclusion of testimony was not required where defense had sufficient time to prepare and did not request an additional continuance), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 845 , 104 S.Ct. 146 , 78 L.Ed.2d 137 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Baker
See United States v. Franklin, 704 F.2d 1183, 1190-92 (10th Cir.) (where government witness was undisclosed in violation of pretrial discovery order, exclusion of testimony was not required where defense had sufficient time to prepare and did not request an additional continuance), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 845 , 104 S.Ct. 146 , 78 L.Ed.2d 137 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Walt Anthony Sturmoski, A/K/A Anthony W. Williams
See United States v. Franklin, 704 F.2d 1183, 1189 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 845 , 104 S.Ct. 146 , 78 L.Ed.2d 137 (1983); see also United States v. Cuch, 842 F.2d 1173, 1178 (10th Cir. 1988).
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Knox
See United States v. Franklin, 704 F.2d 1183, 1187-88 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 845 , 104 S.Ct. 146 , 78 L.Ed.2d 137 (1983). *450 We conclude that, while the evidence was of limited probative value, it did have some.
discussed
Cited "see"
Bartley v. United States
(2×)
See United States v. Franklin, 704 F.2d 1183, 1187-88 (10th Cir.) (evidence of previous assault on interracial couple admissible to prove motive in prosecution under 18 U.S.C. § 245 (b) (1982)), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 845 , 104 S.Ct. 146 , 78 L.Ed.2d 137 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see"
People v. Adrian
(2×)
See United States v. Franklin, 704 F.2d 1183 (10th Cir.), cert. denied 464 U.S. 845 , 104 S.Ct. 146 , 78 L.Ed.2d 137 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Najib Mansour Atisha (85-1537), Michael Covintgon (85-1775), Defendants
See, e.g., United States v. Franklin, 704 F.2d 1183, 1191 (10th Cir.) (evidence was not secreted and its relevance was not readily apparent), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 845 , 104 S.Ct. 146 , 78 L.Ed.2d 137 (1983); Herring, 582 F.2d at 541 (no abuse to admit evidence which was not secreted and was made available to the defendant before the trial began).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Anthony Taylor
See also, United States v. Surridge, 687 F.2d 250, 254-55 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1044 , 103 S.Ct. 465 , 74 L.Ed.2d 614 (1982). 28 In United States v. Franklin, 704 F.2d 1183, 1189-90 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 845 , 104 S.Ct. 146 , 78 L.Ed.2d 137 (1983), we held that under Henry and Massiah, Franklin's right to counsel was not violated when his statement to a Government informant was neither deliberately elicited nor made to a Government agent.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. William Frederick Geittmann, Jr. And David Robert Zamansky, Defendants
See, e.g., United States v. Franklin, 704 F.2d 1183 (10th Cir.1983), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 104 S.Ct. 146 , 78 L.Ed.2d 137 (1983).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Privett
v.
United States
v.
United States
No. 82-7025.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 3, 1983.
Published
C. A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied.