In Re Ingalls, 139 U.S. 548 (1891). · Go Syfert
Search
In Re Ingalls, 139 U.S. 548 (1891). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
58 citation events (4 in the last 25 years) across 26 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Aase v. State, South Dakota Board of Regents (sd, 1987-01-28)
Treatment trajectory · 1900 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1900 1963 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 4 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited as authority (rule) Aase v. State, South Dakota Board of Regents (2×)
S.D. · 1987 · confidence medium
R.R. v. United States, 139 U.S. 560 , 567-68, 11 S.Ct. 638, 640 , 35 L.Ed. 266, 269 (1891); Greenleaf's Lessee v. Birth, 31 U.S. (6 Pet.) 302, 312 , 8 L.Ed. 406, 410 (1832).
discussed Cited "see" Nellie F. Welsh, Administratrix of the Estate of Francis John Welsh, Deceased, and Nellie Welsh, Individually v. United States (2×)
6th Cir. · 1988 · signal: see · confidence high
See Selma, R. & D.R.R. v. United States, 139 U.S. 560 , 567-68, 11 S.Ct. 638, 640-41 , 35 L.Ed. 266 (1891); see generally E.
cited Cited "see" Valcin v. Public Health Trust of Dade County
Fla. Dist. Ct. App. · 1985 · signal: see · confidence high
See Selma, Rome & Dalton Railroad v. United States, 139 U.S. 560 , 11 S.Ct. 638 , 35 L.Ed. 266 ; Nader v. Allegheny Airlines, Inc., 512 F.2d 527 (D.C.
discussed Cited "see" Nicholas C. Ricucci v. The United States (2×)
Ct. Cl. · 1970 · signal: see · confidence high
See Selma, Rome & Dalton RR v. United States, 139 U.S. 560 , 11 S.Ct. 638 , 35 L.Ed. 266 (1891); Fleming v. Harrison, 162 F.2d 789 (8th Cir. 1947).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
In Re INGALLS, Petitioner
Supreme Court of the United States.
Apr 13, 1891.
139 U.S. 548
Mr. de Lagnel Berier for petitioners submitted on his brief. Mr. Edward D. McCarthy also filed a brief for petitioners., Mr. George W. Van Slyck for Elizabeth A. L. Hyatt, opposing.
Per Curiam.
Cited by 1 opinion  |  Published
Per Curíam.

This is an application for a writ of error made to the court in session, under the apprehension on the part of counsel that it was directed to be so presented. We have, therefore, considered it, with the result that the writ must be denied. Dale Tile Mfg. Co. v. Hyatt, 125 U. S. 46; Walter A. Wood Co. v. Skinner, ante, 293.

We wish it to be distinctly .understood that in future no •such application will be entertained, except when a Justice of this Court, upon consideration of the record, has deemed it proper under special circumstances to endorse thereon a request that counsel be permitted to proceed in that way.

Writ refused.