Top citers, strongest first. 1 distinct citer.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
Diaz Esparza v. Garland
Specifically, he asserts that because his conviction for evading 4 Sessions v. Dimaya, ___U.S.___, 138 S. Ct. 1204 , 1210-11 (2018); see Diaz- Esparza, 138 S. Ct. at 1986. 5 8 U.S.C. § 1227 (a)(2)(A)(ii). 6 Chavez-Mercado v. Barr, 946 F.3d 272, 275 (5th Cir. 2020) (internal citation omitted). 3 Case: 19-60699 Document: 00516168969 Page: 4 Date Filed: 01/17/2022 No. 19-60699 arrest was the basis of a prior proceeding under § 1227(a)(2)(A)(iii), this conviction cannot now support removal under § 1227(a)(2)(A)(ii).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Santiago Alejandro DIAZ-ESPARZA
v.
Jefferson B. SESSIONS, III, Attorney General.
v.
Jefferson B. SESSIONS, III, Attorney General.
No. 17–820..
Supreme Court of the United States.
May 14, 2018.
Cited by 2 opinions | Published
On petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit. Petition for writ of certiorari granted. Judgment vacated, and case remanded to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit for further consideration in light of Sessions v. Dimaya, 584 U.S. ----, 138 S.Ct. 1204, 200 L.Ed.2d 549 (2018).