green
Positive treatment
6.5 score
Top citers, strongest first. 3 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
People v. Rush
We conclude that under the circumstances presented here, where the process of jury selection had not yet begun before the courtroom was reopened (cf. Torres, 97 AD3d at 1126-1127 ; Martin, 16 NY3d at 613 ; see generally People v Alvarez, 20 NY3d 75, 81 [2012], cert denied 569 US —, 133 S Ct 2004 [2013]), the improper closing of the courtroom was “too trivial to warrant the remedy of nullifying an otherwise properly conducted . . . criminal trial” (Gibbons v Savage, 555 F3d 112, 121 [2nd Cir 2009], cert denied 558 US 932 [2009]).
discussed
Cited "see"
People v. Rush
We conclude that under the circumstances presented here, where the process of jury selection had not yet begun before the courtroom was reopened (cf. Torres, 97 AD3d at 1126-1127 ; Martin, 16 NY3d at 613 ; see generally People v Alvarez, 20 NY3d 75, 81 [2012], cert denied 569 US —, 133 S Ct 2004 [2013]), the improper closing of the courtroom was “too trivial to warrant the remedy of nullifying an otherwise properly conducted . . . criminal trial” (Gibbons v Savage, 555 F3d 112, 121 [2nd Cir 2009], cert denied 558 US 932 [2009]).
discussed
Cited "see"
RUSH, TERRIE J., PEOPLE v
We conclude that under the circumstances presented here, where the process of jury selection had not yet begun before the courtroom was reopened (cf. Torres, 97 AD3d at 1126-1127 ; Martin, 16 NY3d at 613 ; see generally People Alvarez, 20 NY3d 75, 81 , cert denied ___ US ___, 133 S Ct 2004 ), the improper closing of the courtroom was “too trivial to warrant the remedy of nullifying an otherwise properly conducted . . . criminal trial” (Gibbons v Savage, 555 F3d 112, 121 [2nd Cir -4- 224 KA 11-02039 2009], cert denied 558 US 932 ).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Michelle MAUPIN
v.
HOWARD COUNTY BOARD OF EDUCATION
v.
HOWARD COUNTY BOARD OF EDUCATION
No. 12–1024..
Supreme Court of the United States.
Apr 22, 2013.
Published
Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.