Henderson Bridge Co. v. Henderson City, 173 U.S. 624 (1899). · Go Syfert
Search
Henderson Bridge Co. v. Henderson City, 173 U.S. 624 (1899). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
63 citation events across 22 distinct courts.
Treatment trajectory · 1900 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1900 1963 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 5 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited as authority (rule) Muth v. Educators Security Insurance
Cal. Ct. App. · 1981 · confidence medium
It is a universal rule “that realty is exclusively subject to the lex loci rei sitae—to the law of the state within which it is situated.” (Estate of Patmore (1956) 141 Cal.App.2d 416, 419 [ 296 P.2d 863 ]; and see Sunderland v. United States (1924) 266 U.S. 226, 232-233 [ 69 L.Ed. 259, 260-261 , 45 S.Ct. 64 ]; Barber v. Barber (1958) 51 Cal.2d 244, 247 [ 331 P.2d 628 ]; Cummings v. Bullock (9th Cir. 1966) 367 F.2d 182, 183 ; Losson v. Blodgett (1934) 1 Cal.App.2d 13, 17-18 [ 36 P.2d 147 ].) “[N]o other laws or courts can affect it by an attempt to create, transfer, or vest title there…
cited Cited as authority (rule) U. S. Truck Co. v. Pennsylvania Surety Corp.
Mich. · 1932 · confidence medium
(U. S.) 33, 43, quoted in Security Trust Co. v. Dodd, Mead & Co., 173 U. S. 624, 629 (19 Sup. Ct. 545).
discussed Cited "see" Adams v. Hartzell (2×)
N.D. · 1909 · signal: see · confidence high
See Security Trust Co. v. Dodd, 173 U. S. 624 , 19 Sup. Ct. 545, 43 L.
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Clark v. Preferred Accident Insurance (2×)
S.C. · 1957 · signal: see also · confidence low
R. 347; see also Security Trust Company v. Dodd, 173 U. S. 624 , 19 S. Ct. 545 , 43 L.
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Tallassee Falls Mfg. Co. v. State (2×)
Ala. Ct. App. · 1915 · signal: see also · confidence low
See, also, Henderson Bridge Co. Case, 173 U. S. 624 , 19 Sup. Ct. 877, 43 L.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
HENDERSON BRIDGE COMPANY
v.
HENDERSON CITY.
32.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Apr 3, 1899.
173 U.S. 624
Harlan.
Cited by 3 opinions  |  Published
Error to the Court of Appeals of the State of Kentucky.

MR. JUSTICE HARLAN:

This was an action by the city of Henderson to recover taxes (with interest and penalties) assessed by it upon the property of the Henderson Bridge Company within the limits of that city for the years 1890, 1891, 1892 and 1893. The case presents substantially the same questions that are disposed of in the opinion just delivered in case No. 32 between the same parties for taxes for the years 1888 and 1889. For the reasons stated in that opinion the judgment of the Court of Appeals of Kentucky in the present case must be

Affirmed.