green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
7.7 score
“while had the burden on summary judgment of presenting evidence sufficient to prove its statute of limitations defense, had the burden of proof to rebut the statute of limitations ground by relation back under rule 15(c).”
Treatment trajectory · 1996 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1996
2011
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 3 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
Hodges v. South Dakota School of Mines and Technology
while had the burden on summary judgment of presenting evidence sufficient to prove its statute of limitations defense, had the burden of proof to rebut the statute of limitations ground by relation back under rule 15(c).
examined
Cited as authority (rule)
Manfredo Salinas v. RRRB
(3×)
also: Cited "see", Cited "see, e.g."
In Roberts, we “joined several of our sister circuits in determining that we have no jurisdiction [under section 355(f)] to review the Board’s decision not to reopen a prior claim for benefits.” Id. at 140; see also id. at 141 (joining Harris v. R.R.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
United States
v.
Anderson
v.
Anderson
95-10274.
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit.
Jul 25, 1996.
95 F.3d 52
Unpublished
Citer courts: D. South Dakota (1)
U.S.
v.
Anderson
NOS. 95-10274, 95-10275
United States Court of Appeals,
Fifth Circuit.
July 24, 1996
Appeal From: N.D.Tex., No. 3:92-CR-417-G
1
AFFIRMED.