Mulford v. Smith (1939)
green
· 547 citation events
across 67 courts.
Showing the 24 strongest citers on record
(one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).
Treatment trajectory · 1938 → 2026 · click a year to view the case as of then
193819822026
Sort:
By significance ·
Most recent
green
McGautha v. California (1971)
We have often noted the importance of administrative or judicial review in providing a check on the exercise of arbitrary power, Mulford v. Smith, 307 U. S. 38, 49 (1939); American Power & Light Co. v. SEC, 329 U. S. 90, 105 (1946), and we have made clear that judicial review is designed to reinforce internal protections against arbitrary or unconsidered action while leaving questions of policy to the agency or the Congress.
green
American Federation of Labor v. Watson (1946)
And since the right asserted is derived from or recognized by a federal law regulating commerce, a majority of the Court conclude that a suit to protect it against impairment by state action is a suit “arising under” a federal law “regulating commerce.” Cf. Mulford v. Smith, 307 U. S. 38, 46; Peyton v. Railway Express Agency, 316 U. S. 350 ; Parker v. Brown, 317 U. S. 341, 349 ; Tunstall v. Brotherhood of Firemen, 323 U. S. 210, 213 .
green
Switchmen's Union v. National Mediation Board (1943)
Peyton v. Railway Express Agency, 316 U. S. 350 ; Mulford v. Smith, 307 U. S. 38, 46; Turner Lumber Co. v. Chicago, M. & St.
green
Opp Cotton Mills, Inc. v. Administrator of the Wage & Hour Division of the Department of Labor (1941)
Co., 190 U. S. 273 (Interstate Commerce Act); Mulford v. Smith, 307 U. S. 38, 48, 49 (Agricultural Adjustment Act of 1938); Sunshine Anthracite Coal Co. v. Adkins, 310 U. S. 381, 399 (Bituminous Coal Conservation Act of 1937); Currin v. Wallace, 306 U. S. 1 (Federal Tobacco Inspection Act); United States v. Rock Royal Co-operative, 307 U. S. 533 (Agricultural Marketing Agreement Act).
green
Gay Union Corporation v. Wallace (1940)
Cf. Currin v. Wallace, supra, 306 U.S. at page 16, 17 , 59 S.Ct. at page 379 , 83 L.Ed. 441 ; Mulford v. Smith, supra, 307 U.S. at page 48, 49 , 59 S.Ct. at page 648 , 83 L.Ed. 1092 ; United States v. Rock Royal Co-op., supra, 307 U.S. at page 574, 59 S.Ct. at page 993, 83 L.Ed. 1446 .
green
Cole v. AGRI (1998)
Furthermore, the Supreme Court has interpreted the regulatory scheme as “giv[ing] the United States a civil action for the recovery of unpaid penalties.” Mulford v. Smith, 307 U.S. 38, 45 (1939) (referring to “proceedings” authorized by 7 U.S.C. § 1376 ) (emphasis added).
referring to “proceedings” authorized by 7 U.S.C. § 1376
green
Elizabeth Arden, Inc. v. Federal Trade Commission (1946)
Ed. 624 ; Yakus v. United States, 321 U.S. 414 , 64 S.Ct. 660 , 88 L.Ed. 834 ; Mulford v. Smith, 307 U.S. 38, 48, 49 , 59 S.Ct. 648 , 83 L.Ed. 1092 ; Guiseppi v. Walling, 2 Cir., 144 F.2d 608, 615-623 , 155 A.L.R. 761 ; United Business Corp. v. Commissioner, 2 Cir., 62 F.2d 754, 755, 756 . 5 Cf. Corn Products Refining Co. v. Federal Trade Commission, 7 Cir., 144 F.2d 211, 215 ; and see 324 U.S. 726, 745 , 65 S.Ct. 961 , 89 L.Ed. 1320 ; Oliver Bros. v. Federal Trade Commissio…
green
Northwestern Improvement Co. v. Ickes (1940)
To the same effect are Mulford v. Smith, 307 U.S. 38, 47, 48 , 59 S.Ct. 648 , 83 L.Ed. 1092 ; and United States v. Rock Royal Co-operative, Inc., et al., 307 U.S. 533, 568 , 59 S.Ct. 993 , 83 L.Ed. 1446 .
green
Lyon v. Atlantic Coast Line Railroad (1964)
The case is therefore one arising under a law regulating commerce of which the federal courts are given jurisdiction by 28 U.S.C. § 41 (8), Judicial Code § 24(8); Mulford v. Smith, 307 U.S. 38, 46 [ 59 S.Ct. 648 , 83 L.Ed. 1092 ]; Peyton v. Railway Express Agency, 316 U.S. 350 [ 62 S.Ct. 1171 , 86 L.Ed. 1525 ] ; cf. Illinois Steel Co. v. B. & O.
green
Bell Aircraft Corporation v. Anderson (1946)
A., § 41(8); Mulford v. Smith, 307 U. S. 38, 46 (59 Sup. Ct. 648, 83 L. ed. 1092); Robertson v. Argus Hosiery Mills, 6 Cir., 121 Fed. 2d, 285, 286.
green
National League of Cities v. Usery (1976)
See, e. g., Mulford v. Smith, supra, at 51 (Butler, J., dissenting); NLRB v. Jones & Laughlin Steel Corp., supra, at 76 (McReynolds, J., dissenting). [9] *869 That no precedent justifies today's result is particularly clear from the awkward extension of the doctrine of state immunity from federal taxationan immunity conclusively distinguished by Mr. Justice Stone in California , and an immunity that is "narrowly limited" because "the people of all the states have created th…
Butler, J., dissenting
green
Felter v. Southern Pacific Co. (1959)
See Mulford v. Smith, 307 U. S. 38, 46 ; Turner, Dennis & Lowry Lumber Co. v. Chicago, M. & St.
See, for instance, Mulford v. Smith, 1939, 307 U.S. 38 , 59 S.Ct. 648 , 83 L.Ed. 1092 ; United States v. Rock Royal Co-operative, Inc., 1939, 307 U.S. 533 , 59 S.Ct. 993 , 83 L.Ed. 1446 ; Sunshine Anthracite Coal Co. v. Adkins, 1940, 310 U.S. 381 , 60 S.Ct. 907 , 84 L.Ed. 1263 ; Opp Cotton Mills, Inc., v. Administrator, 1941, 312 U.S. 126, 657 , 61 S.Ct. 524 , 85 L.Ed. 624 ; Federal Security Administrator v. Quaker Oats Co., 1943, 318 U.S. 218 , 63 S.Ct. 589 , 87 L.Ed. 724 ;…
green
United States v. Orle Morales-Ruiz (2016)
green
Rogers Truck Line, Inc. v. United States (1987)
green
United States v. Shafer (1955)
See also Mulford v. Smith, 307 U.S. 38 , 59 S.Ct. 648 , 83 L.Ed. 1092 , and Troppy v. La Sara Farmers Gin Co., 5 Cir., 113 F.2d 350 .
green
Irving Subway Grating Co. v. Silverman (1953)
See Mulford v. Smith, 307 U.S. 38 , 59 S.Ct. 648 , 83 L.Ed. 1092 ; Weiss v. Los Angeles Broadcasting Co., Inc., 9 Cir., 163 F.2d 313 .
green
United States v. Biehunko (1944)
See Mulford v. Smith, 307 U.S. 38, 47 , 59 S.Ct. 648 , 83 L.Ed. 1092 ; Troppy v. La Sara Farmers Gin Company, Inc., 5 Cir., 113 F.2d 350 ; Hawthorne v. United States, 5 Cir., 115 F.2d 805 .
green
Lee v. Acme Freight Lines, Inc. (1944)
See Mulford v. Smith, 307 U.S. 38, 46 , 59 S.Ct. 648 , 83 L.Ed. 1092 ; Williams v. Jacksonville Terminal Co., 315 U.S. 386, 390 , 62 S.Ct. 659 , 86 L.Ed. 914 ; Robertson v. Argus Hosiery Mills, 6 Cir., 121 F.2d 285, 286 ; Brantley v. Augusta Ice & Coal Co., D.C., 52 F.Supp. 158, 160 .
green
Divine v. Levy (1940)
See Mulford v. Smith, 307 U.S. 38 , 59 S.Ct. 648 , 83 L.Ed. 1092 , 'the real source of authority for decision.
green
Presidential Authority Under the Trade Expansion Act toAdjust Shipments of Oil to and from Puerto Rico (1980)
It is well established that regulations of commerce need not be uniform, see, e.g., Currin v. Wallace, 306 U.S. 1, 13-14 (1939); see also Mulford v. Smith, 307 U.S. 38, 48-49 (1939), unless some other constitutional provision—such as the uniformity of duties clause, Art.