How cited: Honeywood v. Rockefeller · Go Syfert

Honeywood v. Rockefeller (1962)

green · 41 citation events across 19 courts. Showing the 7 strongest citers on record (one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).
Treatment trajectory · 1900 → 2026 · click a year to view the case as of then
190019632026
Cited · 5th Cir. · signal: see
See memorandum opinion in Boyes v. United States, 372 U.S. 242 , 10 L.Ed.2d 409 , wherein the Supreme Court by per curiam order vacated judgment of this court, granted certiorari, leave to proceed in forma pauperis, and remanded the case to the district court for further consideration in the light of Sanders v. United States, 371 U.S. 1 , 83 S.Ct. 1068 , 10 L.Ed.2d 1048 .
Cited · S.D. Cal. · signal: see
See Foman v. David, 371 U.S. 1 178 , 181–82 (1962). 2 III.
Cited (see also) · N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. · signal: see, e.g.
See, e.g., Carr v. State of New York, 15 A.D. 2d 709 , 223 N.Y.S. 2d 229 (App.Div.1962), appl. dism. 371 U.S. 14 , 83 S.Ct. 44 , 9 L.Ed. 2d 49 (1962) (stating that by restricting payment of prizes to "holder[s] of winning tickets[,]" the legislature intended to exclude one who was a holder of a winning ticket or one who is entitled to be but is not presently a holder of a winning ticket); State v. Nebraska State Bd. of Agric., 217 Neb. 622 , 350 N.W. 2d 535 (1984) ("A pari-m…
stating that by restricting payment of prizes to "holder[s] of winning tickets[,]" the legislature intended to exclude one who was a holder of a winning ticket or one who is entitled to be but is not presently a holder of a winning ticket
Cited (see also) · N.J. · signal: compare
Compare this Court's remark in Household Finance Corp. v. Director of Div. of Taxation, 36 N.J. 353, 358 , app. dism., 371 U.S. 13 , 83 S.Ct. 41 , 9 L.Ed.2d 49 (1962): While the “excise tax may gather the hue of a property tax ... it is the franchise to do local business that is being valued rather than any specific piece of property devoted to it.” (quoted in Motor Finance Corp. v. Director, Div. of Taxation, 129 N.J.Super. 19, 23 (App.Div.1974)).
green Nova v. State (1983)
Cited · Fla. Dist. Ct. App. · signal: see
See generally Sanders v. United States, 371 U.S. 1 , 83 S.Ct. 1068 , 10 L.Ed.2d 148 (1963); Lawson v. State, 231 So.2d 205 (Fla. 1970); Flores v. Wainwright, 240 So.2d 816 (Fla. 2d DCA 1970); Richardson v. State, 202 So.2d 137 (Fla. 3d DCA 1967); Weeks v. State, 201 So.2d 764 (Fla. 3d DCA 1967); Hall v. State, 183 So.2d 277 (Fla. 3d DCA 1966); Piehl v. State, 173 So.2d 723 (Fla. 1st DCA 1965), quashed on other grounds, 184 So.2d 417 (Fla. 1966).
green Nova v. State (1983)
Cited · Fla. Dist. Ct. App. · signal: see
See generally Sanders v. United States, 371 U.S. 1 , 83 S.Ct. 1068 , 10 L.Ed.2d 148 (1963); Lawson v. State, 231 So.2d 205 (Fla. 1970); Flores v. Wainwright, 240 So.2d 816 (Fla. 2d DCA 1970); Richardson v. State, 202 So.2d 137 (Fla. 3d DCA 1967); Weeks v. State, 201 So.2d 764 (Fla. 3d DCA 1967); Hall v. State, 183 So.2d 277 (Fla. 3d DCA 1966); Piehl v. State, 173 So.2d 723 (Fla. 1st DCA 1965), quashed on other grounds, 184 So.2d 417 (Fla.1966).
Cited · N.J. · signal: see
See Household Finance Corporation v. Director of Division of Taxation, 36 N. J. 353 (1962), appeal dismissed, cert. den. 371 U. S. 13 , 83 S. Ct. 41 , 9 L.