Local No. 438 Construction & General Laborers' Union v. Curry (1963)
green
· 328 citation events
across 43 courts.
Showing the 25 strongest citers on record
(one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).
Treatment trajectory · 1963 → 2026 · click a year to view the case as of then
196319942026
Sort:
By significance ·
Most recent
green
Mathews v. Eldridge (1976)
See, e. g., Harris v. Washington, 404 U. S. 55 (1971); Construction Laborers v. Curry, 371 U. S. 542, 549-550 (1963); Mercantile Nat.
green
Cox Broadcasting Corp. v. Cohn (1975)
Dickinson v. Petroleum Conversion Corp., 338 U. S. 507, 511 , pointed out that in deciding the question of finality the most important competing considerations are `the inconvenience and costs of piecemeal review on the one hand and the danger of denying justice by delay on the other.' " 379 U. S., at 152-153. [8] Other cases from state courts where this Court's jurisdiction was sustained for similar reasons include: Organization for a Better Austin v. Keefe, 402 U. S. 415 ,…
green
Patterson v. McLean Credit Union (1989)
Co., 406 U. S. 320, 322-323 (1972), or where the later law has rendered the decision irreconcilable with competing legal doctrines or policies, see, e. g., Braden v. 30th Judicial Circuit Ct. of Ky., 410 U. S. 484, 497-499 (1973); Construction Laborers v. Curry, 371 U. S. 542, 552 (1963), the Court has not hesitated to overrule an earlier decision.
green
Walters v. National Assn. of Radiation Survivors (1985)
See, e. g., Cox Broadcasting Corp. v. Cohn, 420 U. S. 469, 476-487 (1975); Construction Laborers v. Curry, 371 U. S. 542, 548-551 (1963). [19] Cohen v. Beneficial Industrial Loan Corp., supra, at 546. [20] "When Congress created the exceptional right to bypass the court of appeals, it directly linked that right to a lower court's invalidation of an Act of Congress.
green
Belknap, Inc. v. Hale (1983)
Board, not by the state courts.’” Cox Broadcasting Corp. v. Cohn, 420 U. S. 469, 483 (1975), quoting Construction Laborers v. Curry, 371 U. S. 542, 550 (1963).
green
Organization for a Better Austin v. Keefe (1971)
Co., 345 U. S. 379, 382 (1953); Construction Laborers' Local 438 v. Curry, 371 U. S. 542, 550-551 (1963); Mills v. Alabama, 384 U. S. 214, 217-218 (1966).
green
Musicians Union, Local No. 6 v. Superior Court (1968)
Trades Council v. Garmon (1959) 359 U.S. 236, 245 [ 3 L.Ed.2d 775, 783 , 79 S.Ct. 773 ].) We have concluded that the Act “arguably” protects or prohibits the activities enjoined in the present case, and that respondent court was therefore without jurisdiction to enjoin them. 6 (See Garner v. Teamsters Union (1953) 346 U.S. 485, 500 [ 98 L.Ed. 228 , 244-245, 74 S.Ct. 161 ] ; Weber v. Anheuser-Busch, Inc. (1955) 348 U.S. 468, 481 [ 99 L.Ed. 546, 558 , 75 S.Ct. 480 ] ; Construc…
green
Dillon v. Reid (2011)
Union v. Curry, 371 U. S. 542, 548 (83 SC 531, 9 LE2d 514) (1963) (finding “a judgment of the Georgia court finally and erroneously asserting its jurisdiction to deal with a controversy which is beyond its power and instead is within the exclusive domain of the National Labor Relations Board”); Stivali v. Aquiport Aylesbury, 244 Ga. App. 389, 391 (1) ( 535 SE2d 551 ) (2000) (trial court lacked subject matter jurisdiction over claim that appellees violated the terms of the ba…
green
Union Camp Corp. v. Savannah Building Trades Council (1987)
Union v. Curry, 371 U. S. 542, 546 (83 SC 531, 9 LE2d 514) (1963).
Whether the alleged contractual violations should be presented to an arbitrator or to the court for determination “is a matter wholly separate from . . . the merits of [plaintiffs] cause.” Local No. 438 Construction & General Laborers’ Union v. Curry, 371 U.S. 542, 548 (1963).
green
Gust G. Larson & Sons, Inc. v. Radio & Television Broadcast Engineers Local Union No. 1220 (1965)
Liner v. Jafco, 375 US 301, 306, 307 (1964); Local No. 438 v. Curry, 371 US 542, 546, 547 (1963); San Diego Bldg.
green
Pual Chapman v. State of California (1972)
See also Local No. 438 construction and General Laborers' Union v. Curry, 371 U.S. 542, 548-551 , 83 S.Ct. 531, 535-537 , 9 L.Ed.2d 514 ; Richfield Oil Corp. v. State Board, 329 U.S. 69, 72-74 , 67 S.Ct. 156, 158-159 , 91 L.Ed. 80 .
Compare Construction Laborers' Local 438 v. Curry, 371 U. S. 542 (1963). [6] Petitioners did not argue their pre-emption contentions in their brief before the Pennsylvania Supreme Court and, accordingly, that court does not appear to have passed on them. [7] Needless to say, had the Pennsylvania Supreme Court relied on the purpose of the picketing and held it to be illegal, substantial questions of pre-emption under the federal labor laws would have been presented.
green
Mills v. Alabama (1966)
See also Construction Laborers v. Curry, 371 U. S. 542, 548-551 ; Richfield Oil Corp. v. State Board, 329 U. S. 69, 72-74 .
green
Pennsylvania v. Ritchie (1987)
See Construction Laborers v. Curry, 371 U. S. 542, 550 (1963); Radio Station WOW, Inc. v. Johnson, 326 U. S. 120, 124 (1945).
green
International Longshoremen's Ass'n v. Davis (1986)
See Construction Laborers v. Curry, 371 U. S. 542, 546 (1963). [5] There is indeed a cloud over Davis' status.
green
Buffalo Forge Co. v. United Steelworkers (1976)
See n. 8, supra. Construction Laborers v. Curry, 371 U. S. 542, 550 ; Liner v. Jafco, Inc., 375 U. S. 301, 308 .
green
Chapman v. California (1972)
See also Construction Laborers v. Curry, 371 U. S. 542, 548-551 ; Richfield Oil Corp. v. State Board, 329 U. S. 69, 72-74 .
See Local 488, Construction Laborers v. Curry, 1963, 371 U.S. 542 , 83 S.Ct. 531 , 9 L.Ed.2d 514 ; Mercantile National Bank v. Langdau, 1963, 371 U.S. 555, 558 , 83 S.Ct. 520 , 9 L.Ed.2d 523 . 18 As do the cited cases, the instant case involves an order deciding, not what the merits of the case are, but where and how the case should proceed.
See Curry, 371 U.S. at 549 , 83 S.Ct. at 536 ; Cohen v. Beneficial Industrial Loan Co., 337 U.S. 541, 546-47 , 69 S.Ct. 1221, 1225-26 , 93 L.Ed. 1528 (1949) (setting out the elements of this test); cf. Board of Education v. Illinois State Board of Education, 79 F.3d 654 , 656-59 (7th Cir.1996) (finding an order appealable both as an appealable interlocutory order under 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (a)(1) and as a “final” order under Cohen).
green
Britton v. Howard Savings Bank (1984)
See, e.g., Local No. 438 Construction & General Laborers’ Union v. Curry, 371 U.S. 542, 546 , 83 S.Ct. 531, 534 , 9 L.Ed. 514 (1963) (order issuing injunction prohibiting labor picketing appealable; whether injunction should have issued depended on whether complaint made out an “arguable violation” of NLRA); Cox Broadcasting Corp. v. Cohn, 420 U.S. 469, 486 , 95 S.Ct. 1029, 1041 , 43 L.Ed.2d 328 (1975) (challenged state statute would affect first amendment rights pendente li…
order issuing injunction prohibiting labor picketing appealable; whether injunction should have issued depended on whether complaint made out an “arguable violation” of NLRA
green
Britton v. Howard Savings Bank (1984)
See, e.g., Local No. 438 Construction & General Laborers' Union v. Curry, 371 U.S. 542, 546 , 83 S.Ct. 531, 534 , 9 L.Ed. 514 (1963) (order issuing injunction prohibiting labor picketing appealable; whether injunction should have issued depended on whether complaint made out an "arguable violation" of NLRA); Cox Broadcasting Corp. v. Cohn, 420 U.S. 469, 486 , 95 S.Ct. 1029, 1041 , 43 L.Ed.2d 328 (1975) (challenged state statute would affect first amendment rights pendente li…
order issuing injunction prohibiting labor picketing appealable; whether injunction should have issued depended on whether complaint made out an "arguable violation" of NLRA
green
Local 771, I.A.T.S.E., Afl-Cio, Plaintiff-Appellee-Cross-Appellant v. Rko General, Inc., Wor Division, Defend… (1977)
See also Local 438 Construction & General Laborers Union, AFL-CIO v. Curry, 371 U.S. 542, 548-50 , 83 S.Ct.531, 9 L.Ed.2d 514 (1963); Mercantile National Bank v. Langdeau, 371 U.S. 555, 558 , 83 S.Ct. 520 , 9 L.Ed.2d 523 (1963) (involving Supreme Court review under 28 U.S.C. § 1257 ).
green
Commonwealth v. Barber (1975)
Cox Broadcasting Corp. v. Cohn, 420 U.S. 469, 485-486 , 95 S.Ct. 1029, 1040 , 43 L.Ed.2d 328 (1975); see Local 438, Construction & General Laborers Union v. Curry, 371 U.S. 542, 548-50 , 83 S.Ct. 531, 535-37 , 9 L.Ed.2d 514 (1963); Mercantile Nat'l Bank v. Langdeau, 371 U.S. 555, 557-58 , 83 S.Ct. 520, 522 , 9 L.Ed.2d 523 (1963); Rosenblatt v. American Cyanamid Co., 86 S.Ct. 1 , 2-3, 15 L.Ed.2d 39 (1965) (opinion of Mr. Justice Goldberg in chambers). [4] The views expressed …
green
Commonwealth v. Barber (1975)
Cox Broadcasting Corp. v. Cohn, 420 U.S. 469 , 485—486, 95 S.Ct. 1029, 1040 , 43 L.Ed.2d 328 (1975); see Local 438, Construction & General Laborers Union v. Curry, 371 U.S. 542, 548-50 , 83 S.Ct. 531, 535-37 , 9 L.Ed.2d 514 (1963); Mercantile Nat’l Bank v. Langdeau, 371 U.S. 555, 557-58 , 83 S.Ct. 520, 522 , 9 L.Ed.2d 523 (1963); Rosenblatt v. American Cyanamid Co., 86 S.Ct. 1 , 2-3, 15 L.Ed.2d 39 (1965) (opinion of Mr. Justice Goldberg in chambers). .