Janis v. Commonwealth (1996)
green
· 180 citation events
across 6 courts.
Showing the 35 strongest citers on record
(one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).
Treatment trajectory · 1996 → 2026 · click a year to view the case as of then
199620112026
Sort:
By significance ·
Most recent
yellow
Holland v. Holland (1999)
But see, Theismann v. Theismann, 22 Va. App. 557, 572 , 471 S.E.2d 809 , aff'd en banc, 23 Va. App. 697 , 479 S.E.2d 534 (1996) (finding alimony payments to prior wife constitute “dissipation”); Luczkovich v. Luczkovich, 26 Va. App. 702, 714 , 496 S.E.2d 157 (1998) (affirming trial court determination that husband did not satisfy burden of proof to show propriety of expenditures through line of credit); Barker v. Barker, 27 Va. App. 519, 536 , 500 S.E.2d 240 (1998) (payment …
finding alimony payments to prior wife constitute “dissipation”
green
Lowell F. Smith v. Alice L. Thornton-Smith (2007)
The party claiming the existence of a gift must prove by clear and convincing evidence “(1) intention on the part of the donor to make a gift; (2) delivery or transfer of the gift; and (3) acceptance of the gift by the donee.” Id. at 566, 471 S.E.2d at 813 .
green
George Thomas West, Jr. v. Patricia West (2003)
The party claiming the existence of a gift must prove by clear and convincing evidence "(1) intention on the part of the donor to make a gift; (2) delivery or transfer of the gift; and (3) acceptance of the gift by the donee." Id. at 566, 471 S.E.2d at 813 .
Our holding makes it unnecessary to determine whether this statute was violated, and if it was, whether the arrest was nevertheless a valid citizen’s arrest, see Tharp v. Commonwealth, 221 Va. 487, 490 , 270 S.E.2d 752, 754 (1980). 2 Even if Christian sought to exclude evidence obtained during his arrest, “Virginia law does not, as a general matter, require suppression of evidence obtained in violation of state law.” Virginia v. Moore, 553 U.S. 164 , ___ (2008); see also Jan…
See Janis v. Commonwealth, 22 Va. App. 646, 651 , 472 S.E.2d 649, 652 (holding that exclusion is not an appropriate remedy when a state statute is violated “‘absent an express statutory provision for suppression’” (quoting Troncoso v. Commonwealth, 12 Va. App. 942, 944 , 407 S.E.2d 349, 350 (1991))), aff'd on reh’g en banc, 23 Va. App. 696 , 479 S.E.2d 534 (1996).
green
McKee v. McKee (2008)
See Theismann v. Theismann, 22 Va.App. 557, 573 , 471 S.E.2d 809, 817 (holding that the circuit court did not abuse its discretion in refusing to impute income to a spouse where the spouse “had made preliminary efforts at reentering the workforce and that she had not refused any offers of employment”), aff'd on reh’g en banc, 23 Va.App. 697 , 479 S.E.2d 534 (1996).
green
Seaton v. Commonwealth (2004)
See, e.g., Janis v. Commonwealth, 22 Va.App. 646, 651, 472 S.E.2d 649, 652 , aff'd on reh’g en banc, 23 Va.App. 696 , 479 S.E.2d 534 (1996); see also Vinson v. Commonwealth, 258 Va. 459, 469, 522 S.E.2d 170, 177 (1999); Penn v. Commonwealth, 13 Va.App. 399, 406-07 , 412 S.E.2d 189, 193 (1991), aff'd per curiam, 244 Va. 218 , 420 S.E.2d 713 (1992); Thompson v. Commonwealth, 10 Va.App. 117, 122 , 390 S.E.2d 198, 201 (1990). 8 .
green
Colaw v. Commonwealth (2000)
See Janis v. Commonwealth, 22 Va.App. 646, 653-54 , 472 S.E.2d 649, 653 (1996) (holding that the “affidavit gave absolutely no indication that the fruits of criminal activity would *814 probably be found at that location, rendering [the officer’s] belief in probable cause, based solely on the affidavit, objectively unreasonable ”), aff'd en banc, 23 Va.App. 696 , 479 S.E.2d 534 (1996); see also Atkins, 9 Va.App. at 464 , 389 S.E.2d at 180 (holding that evidence was admissibl…
green
Kelln v. Kelln (1999)
See Theismann v. Theismann, 22 Va.App. 557, 566 , 471 S.E.2d 809, 813 , aff'd on reh’g en banc, 23 Va.App. 697 , 479 S.E.2d 534 (1996) (stating that one of the elements of a valid gift is the donor’s intent to make a gift).
stating that one of the elements of a valid gift is the donor’s intent to make a gift
green
Commonwealth of Virginia v. Christian Jason Rowe (2024)
See Janis v. Commonwealth, 22 Va. App. 646, 652 , adopted upon reh’g en banc, 23 Va. App. 696 (1996); see also Cole, 294 Va. at 354 (noting that at a hearing on a motion to suppress, the Commonwealth bears the burden of establishing that evidence was obtained within the bounds of the Constitution).
green
Charles J. DeLanoy v. Robin R. DeLanoy (2014)
See Theismann v. Theismann, 22 Va. App. 557, 566 , 471 S.E.2d 809, 813 (affirming a finding of donative intent where the husband sent the wife cards indicating that a farm “was ‘our home’” and that “money was hers to spend”), aff’d on reh’g en banc, 23 Va. App. 697 , 479 S.E.2d 534 (1996); see also Watts v. Watts, 40 Va. App. 685, 702 , 581 S.E.2d 224, 233 (2003) (reversing the trial court’s finding that the disputed items were the wife’s separate property when she testified…
See Theismann v. Theismann, 22 Va. App. 557, 566 , 471 S.E.2d 809, 813 (affirming a finding of donative intent where the husband sent the wife cards indicating that a farm “was ‘our home’” and that “money was hers to spend”), aff’d on reh’g en banc, 23 Va. App. 697 , 479 S.E.2d 534 (1996); see also Watts v. Watts, 40 Va. App. 685, 702 , 581 S.E.2d 224, 233 (2003) (reversing the trial court’s finding that the disputed items were the wife’s separate property when she testified…
green
David Alexander Pineda v. Commonwealth of Virginia (2012)
We will not search the record for errors in order to interpret the appellant’s contention and correct deficiencies in a brief.” Id. at 56 , 415 S.E.2d at 239 ; see also Theismann v. Theismann, 22 Va. App. 557, 572 , 471 S.E.2d 809, 816 (declining to address an argument that was inadequately developed in appellant’s brief), aff’d en banc, 23 Va. App. 697 , 479 S.E.2d 534 (1996).
See Theismann v. Theismann, 22 Va. App. 557, 574 , 471 S.E.2d 809, 817 (holding that husband’s “clearly superior financial position” and the fact that his infidelity caused the break-up of the marriage justified an award of attorney’s fees to wife), aff’d upon reh’g en banc, 23 Va. App. 697 , 479 S.E.2d 534 (1996).
green
Robinson v. Robinson (2009)
See Theismann v. Theismann, 22 Va.App. 557, 573 , 471 S.E.2d 809, 817 (rejecting wife’s argument that her spousal support award was inadequate even though it would not allow her to maintain the standard of living she enjoyed during the marriage and husband could afford to pay more), aff'd on reh’g en banc, 23 Va.App. 697 , 479 S.E.2d 534 (1996).
green
Carey Dean Roberts v. Debora B. Roberts (2007)
Blank v. Blank, 10 Va. App. 1, 9 , 389 S.E.2d 723, 727 (1990); see also Theismann v. Theismann, 22 Va. App. 557, 570 , 471 S.E.2d 809, 815 , aff’d en banc, 23 Va. App. 697 , 479 S.E.2d 534 (1996) (citing Blank).
citing Blank
green
Jonathan Scott Towner v. Paulette Moore Towner (2006)
We will not search the record for errors in order to interpret the appellant’s contention and correct deficiencies in a brief.” Id. at 56 , 415 S.E.2d at 239 ; see also Theismann v. Theismann, 22 Va. App. 557, 572 , 471 S.E.2d 809, 816 (declining to address an argument that was inadequately developed in appellant’s brief), aff’d en banc, 23 Va. App. 697 , 479 S.E.2d 534 (1996); Fitzgerald v. Bass, 6 Va. App. 38 , 56 n.7, 366 S.E.2d 615 , 625 n.7 (1988) (en banc) (noting that…
green
Thomas Joseph Goudreau v. Katherine Lynn Goudreau (2006)
See Theismann v. Theismann, 22 Va. App. 557, 572 , 471 S.E.2d 809, 816 (declining to address an argument on appeal that was inadequately developed in appellant’s brief), aff’d en banc, 23 Va. App. 697 , 479 S.E.2d 534 (1996).
green
Mullin v. Mullin (2005)
We will not search the record for errors in order to interpret the appellant’s contention and correct deficiencies in a brief.” Id. at 56 , 415 S.E.2d at 239 ; see also Theismann v. Theismann, 22 Va.App. 557, 572 , 471 S.E.2d 809, 816 (declining to address an argument that was inadequately developed in appellant’s brief), aff'd en banc, 23 Va. App. 697 , 479 S.E.2d 534 (1996); Fitzgerald v. Bass, 6 Va.App. 38 , 56 n. 7, 366 S.E.2d 615 , 625 n. 7 (1988) (en banc) (noting that…
green
Fatemeh Nasrin Ghods v. John D. Musick (2005)
Lightburn v. Lightburn, 22 Va. App. 612, 618 , 472 S.E.2d 281, 284 (1996); see also Theismann v. Theismann, 22 Va. App. 557, 568 , 471 S.E.2d 809, 813-15 , aff’d on reh’g en banc, 23 Va. App. 697 , 479 S.E.2d 534 (1996).
green
Ranney v. Ranney (2005)
See Theismann v. Theismann, 22 Va.App. 557, 564-65 , 471 S.E.2d 809, 812 (“The goal of equitable distribution is to adjust the property interests of the spouses fairly and equitably.”), aff'd on rehearing en banc, 23 Va.App. 697 , 479 S.E.2d 534 (1996).
green
Miller v. Cox (2005)
See, e.g., Theismann v. Theismann, 22 Va.App. 557, 573 , 471 S.E.2d 809, 816 (noting that the trial court must consider factors other than the parties' standard of living during the marriage, such as the factors that contributed to the dissolution of the marriage and the duration of the marriage), aff'd on reh’g en banc, 23 Va.App. 697, 479 S.E.2d 534 (1996).
green
Budnick v. Budnick (2004)
See Theismann v. Theismann, 22 Va.App. 557, 569 , 471 S.E.2d 809, 815 , aff'd upon reh’g en banc, 23 Va.App. 697 , 479 S.E.2d 534 (1996); O’Loughlin, 20 Va.App. at 528, 458 S.E.2d at 326 .
green
Watts v. Watts (2003)
See also Theismann v. Theismann, 22 Va.App. 557, 565-66 , 471 S.E.2d 809, 813 , aff'd, 23 Va.App. 697 , 479 S.E.2d 534 (1996) (en banc).
en banc
green
Aubrey J El v. Dept of Social Servs, etc (2002)
See Theismann v. Theismann, 22 Va. App. 557, 572 , 471 S.E.2d 809, 816 , aff'd, 23 Va. App. 687 , 479 S.E.2d 534 (1996) (en banc).
en banc
green
Commonwealth v. Vick (2001)
See Janis v. Commonwealth, 22 Va. App. 646, 651 , 472 S.E.2d 649, 652 , aff'd on reh’g en banc, 23 Va. App. 696 , 479 S.E.2d 53 (1996).
green
Mary Ann Rowe v. Charles S. Rowe (2000)
See generally Theismann v. Theismann, 22 Va.App. 557, 568 , 471 S.E.2d 809, 814 (1996), aff'd en banc, 23 Va.App. 697 , 479 S.E.2d 534 (1996).
green
Charles S. Rowe v. Mary Ann Rowe (2000)
See generally Theismann v. Theismann, 22 Va. App. 557, 568 , 471 S.E.2d 809, 814 (1996), aff'd en banc, 23 Va. App. 697 , 479 S.E.2d 534 (1996).
green
Judith Cochrane Gilman v. W. Pettus Gilman (2000)
See Theismann v. Theismann, 22 Va. App. 557, 574 , 471 S.E.2d 809, 817 (holding that husband's "clearly superior financial position" and the fact that his infidelity caused the break-up of the marriage justified an award of attorney's fees to wife), aff'd upon reh'g en banc, 23 Va. App. 697 , 479 S.E.2d 534 (1996).
green
W. Pettus Gilman v. Judith Cochrane Gilman (2000)
See Theismann v. Theismann, 22 Va.App. 557, 574 , 471 S.E.2d 809, 817 (holding that husband’s “clearly superior financial position” and the fact that his infidelity caused the break-up of the marriage justified an award of attorney’s fees to wife), aff'd upon reh’g en banc, 23 Va.App. 697 , 479 S.E.2d 534 (1996).
green
Diane Harris Ragsdale v. Thomas H. Ragsdale (1999)
See Theismann v. Theismann, 22 Va. App. 557, 574 , 471 S.E.2d 809, 817 , aff’d upon reh’g en banc, 23 Va. App. 697 , 479 S.E.2d 534 (1996); Poliquin v. Poliquin, 12 Va. App. 676, 681 , 406 S.E.2d 401, 405 (1991).
green
Thomas H. Ragsdale v. Diane Harris Ragsdale (1999)
See Theismann v. Theismann, 22 Va.App. 557, 574 , 471 S.E.2d 809, 817 , aff'd upon reh’g en banc, 23 Va.App. 697 , 479 S.E.2d 534 (1996); Poliquin v. Poliquin, 12 Va.App. 676, 681 , 406 S.E.2d 401, 405 (1991).
green
Robert C. Lightburn v. Sheila Jones Lightburn (1998)
See Theismann v. Theismann, 22 Va. App. 557, 565 , 471 S.E.2d 809, 812 , aff'd en banc, 23 Va. App. 697 , 479 S.E.2d 534 (1996).
green
Dorothy M. Moses v. William J. Moses (1998)
See Theismann v. Theismann, 22 Va. App. 557 , 565 n.1, 471 S.E.2d 809 , 813 n.1 (1996), aff'd on reh'g en banc, 23 Va. App. 697 , 479 S.E.2d 534 (1996).
green
Von Raab v. Von Raab (1997)
If the party claiming the separate interest in transmuted property proves retraceability, the burden shifts to the other party to prove that the transmutation of the separate property resulted from a “gift.” Lightbum v. Lightbum, 22 Va.App. 612, 617 , 472 S.E.2d 281, 283 (1996) (citing Turner, supra, § 5.18); see also Theismann v. Theismann, 22 *249 Va.App. 557, 565-66, 471 S.E.2d 809, 813 , aff'd en banc, 23 Va.App. 697 , 479 S.E.2d 534 (1996).