How cited: National Independent Coal Operators' Assn. v. Kleppe · Go Syfert

National Independent Coal Operators' Assn. v. Kleppe (1976)

green · 123 citation events across 19 courts. Showing the 15 strongest citers on record (one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).
Treatment trajectory · 1976 → 2026 · click a year to view the case as of then
197620012026
Rule Authority · SCOTUS · 2 citations in this opinion
It must be shown that the material facts supporting the decision are not subject to dispute.” 586 F. 2d, at 658-659 (footnotes omitted). *212 The Court of Appeals distinguished decisions of this Court in which it was held that a failure to request a hearing constituted a waiver of any right thereto under the Federal Coal Mine Health and Safety Act of 1969, 83 Stat. 742 , 30 U. S. C. § 801 et seq., and that an agency may place the burden of demonstrating that a case presents …
Rule Authority · D.C. Cir. · 4 citations in this opinion
Id. at 393, 96 S.Ct. at 812 (footnote omitted).
footnote omitted
Rule Authority · D.C. Cir. · 4 citations in this opinion
The trial De novo with a jury is not available for review of issues of fact which "were or could have been litigated" in the court of appeals under § 106. 65 Id. at 393, 96 S.Ct. at 812 (footnote omitted).
footnote omitted
Rule Authority · 3rd Cir.
Coal Operators’ Ass’n v. Kleppe, 423 U.S. 388, 398 (1976) (“[The statute] provides the mine operators with no more than ‘an opportunity’ for a hearing.
green PR Aquaduct v. US EPA (1994)
Rule Authority · 1st Cir.
Coal Operators' Ass'n v. Kleppe, 423 U.S. 388, 398-99 (1976); FPC v. Texaco Inc., 377 U.S. 33, 39-44 (1964); United States v. Storer Broadcasting Co., 351 U.S. 192, 205 (1956); see also Ames & McCracken, supra, at 41 n.164 (listing cases to similar effect involving different agencies).
green PR Aquaduct v. US EPA (1994)
Rule Authority · 1st Cir.
See ___ Heckler v. Campbell, 461 U.S. 458, 467 (1983); National Indep. _______ ________ _______________ Coal Operators' Ass'n v. Kleppe, 423 U.S. 388, 398-99 (1976); FPC _____________________ ______ ___ v. Texaco Inc., 377 U.S. 33, 39-44 (1964); United States v. ____________ ______________ Storer Broadcasting Co., 351 U.S. 192, 205 (1956); see also Ames ________________________ ___ ____ & McCracken, supra, at 41 n.164 (listing cases to similar effect _____ involving differen…
green Andrus v. Double \Q\" (1977)
Rule Authority · 4 citations in this opinion
While these portions of the opinion obviously lend support to the interpretation presented herein, the Supreme Court specifically noted that it was not deciding the question on the merits. 423 U.S. at 393, n. 3 , 96 S.Ct. 809 .
Quote Authority · Md. · 3 citations in this opinion
We find no deprivation of due process.” See National Coal Operators’ Assn. v. Kleppe, 423 U.S. 388, 399 , 96 S.Ct. 809, 815 , 46 L.Ed.2d 580 (1976) (“When no request for a hearing [before the administrative agency] is made, the operator has in effect voluntarily defaulted and abandoned the right to a hearing and findings ...”); Atlas Roofing Co. v. Occupational S. & H.
“When no request for a hearing [before the administrative agency] is made, the operator has in effect voluntarily defaulted and abandoned the right to a hearing and findings ...”
Rule Authority · N.M. Ct. App.
Coal Operators’ Ass’n v. Kleppe, 423 U.S. 388, 398-99 (1976).
Cited · D.C. Cir. · signal: see · 10 citations in this opinion
See UMW v. Andrus (Carbon Fuel Co.), supra note 1, 189 U.S.App.D.C. at 115 -116 n.50, 581 F.2d at 893 -894 n.50, referring to National Independent Coal Operators’ Ass’n v. Kleppe, 423 U.S. 388, 391 , 96 S.Ct. 809, 811 , 46 L.Ed.2d 580, 584 (1976); Kanawha Coal Co. v. Andrus, 553 F.2d 361, 363 (4th Cir. 1977). .
Cited (see also) · 2d Cir. · signal: compare · 3 citations in this opinion
Compare the Federal Coal Mine Health and Safety Act of 1969, 30 U.S.C. § 801 et seq., where § 819(a)(4) limits the district court, in a proceeding by the government to collect an unpaid civil penalty, to a de novo jury trial on “all relevant issues, except issues of fact which were or could have been litigated in review proceedings before a court of appeals under section 816 . . . .” National Independent Coal Operators’ Ass’n v. Kleppe, 423 U.S. 388, 393 , 96 S.Ct. 809 , 46
per curiam
Cited · 5th Cir. · signal: see
Coal Operators’ Ass’n v. Kleppe, 423 U.S. 388 , 393 n. 3, 96 S.Ct. 809 , 46 L.Ed.2d 580 (1976); see id. (construing the Federal Coal Mine Health and Safety Act of 1969, comparing § 106 of the Act with § 109(a), and concluding that it was unclear whether a “trial de novo is available on the factual basis of the violation as well as on the amount of the penalty”). 56 . 15 U.S.C. § 717t-l(b). 57 . 690 F.2d 1170 (5th Cir.1982). 58 .
Cited (see also) · pactcomplfayett · signal: see also · 3 citations in this opinion
See also, e.g., National Independent Coal Operator’s Association v. Kleppe, 423 U.S. 388 , 96 S.Ct. 809 , 46 L.Ed.2d 580 (1976).
Cited · S.D.N.Y. · signal: see · 3 citations in this opinion
See National Independent Coal Operators Association v. Kleppe, 423 U.S. 388, 398-402 , 96 S.Ct. 809 , 46 L.Ed.2d 580 (1976).
Cited (see also) · D.D.C. · signal: see also
Circuit declined an invitation to rule on whether this is a governmental goal of sufficient significance for O'Brien purposes, see Quincy, 768 F.2d at 1454, other cases establish that the importance of broadcasting generally, and in particular local broadcasting, to the American public is now beyond dispute. [26] See United States v. Southwestern Cable Co., 392 U.S. 157 , 172-73 & nn. 38 & 39, 88 S.Ct. 1994 , 2002-03 & nn. 38 & 39, 20 L.Ed.2d 1001 (1968); National Ass'n of B…