How cited: Phillips v. Parker · Go Syfert

Phillips v. Parker (1986)

green · 66 citation events across 4 courts. Showing the 11 strongest citers on record (one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).
Treatment trajectory · 1986 → 2026 · click a year to view the case as of then
198620062026
Rule Authority · La. · 2 citations in this opinion
Title, supra at § 8.16; Camel, 526 So.2d at 1089-1090 ; Phillips v. Parker, 483 So.2d 972, 975 (La.1986).
Rule Authority · La. Ct. App.
In Cimarex Energy Co. v. Mauboules, 09-1170, 09-1180, 09-1194, pp. 19-20 (La.4/9/10), 40 So.3d 931, 944 , the supreme court explained the public records doctrine, which is set forth in La.Civ.Code art. 3338, 2 stating: The public records doctrine has been described as a negative doctrine because it does not create rights, but, rather, denies the effect of certain rights unless they are recorded. [Peter S. Title, Louisiana Real Estate Transactions, § 8.16 (2009) ]; Camel [v. …
green LALLANDE v. Verret (2009)
Rule Authority · La. Ct. App.
“The purpose of good faith acquisitive prescription is to secure the title of a person who purchases immovable property by a deed translative of title, under the reasonable and objective belief that he is *448 acquiring a valid title to the property, and thereafter remains in peaceful possession of the property for more than ten years without any disturbance by the true owner.” Phillips v. Parker, 483 So.2d 972, 976 (La.1986).
Rule Authority · La. Ct. App.
Phillips v. Parker, 483 So.2d 972, 977 (La.1986); City of Shreveport v. Noel Estate, Inc., 41,148, p. 20 (La.App. 2 Cir. 9/27/06), 941 So.2d 66, 80-81 .
green Mai v. Floyd (2006)
Rule Authority · La. Ct. App.
Phillips v. Parker, 483 So.2d 972, 979 (La.1986).
Rule Authority · La.
(Emphasis added.) Phillips, 483 So.2d at 975-76 (footnotes and citations omitted).
footnotes and citations omitted
Rule Authority · La. Ct. App.
Phillips, 483 So.2d at 975-76 (footnotes and citations omitted).
footnotes and citations omitted
green Mathews v. Mathews (2002)
Rule Authority · La. Ct. App.
Co., 235 La. 708 , 105 So.2d 392 (La.1957). "[T]he primary concern of the public records doctrine is the protection of third persons against unrecorded interests." Phillips v. Parker, 483 So.2d 972, 976 (La.1986).
green Scobee v. Brame (1998)
Rule Authority · La. Ct. App.
The Louisiana Supreme Court has held that "the law of registry does not create rights in a positive sense, but rather has the negative effect of denying the effectiveness of certain rights unless they are recorded." Phillips v. Parker, 483 So.2d 972, 975 (La.1986).
Rule Authority · La. Ct. App.
"From the standpoint of the operation of the public records doctrine, knowledge is an irrelevant consideration." Phillips v. Parker, 483 So.2d 972, at 976 (La.1986).
Cited (see also) · signal: see also
See also Phillips v. Parker, 483 So.2d 972, 97 (La. 1986). (“Any theory of constructive knowledge which imputes knowledge of the contents of the public records to third persons forms no part of the public records doctrine.”). 5 The McCormicks counter that based on the plain, unambiguous language of La.