How cited: Ford v. State · Go Syfert

Ford v. State (1997)

green · 15 citation events across 1 courts. Showing the 8 strongest citers on record (one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).
All Green 8
Sort: By significance · Most recent
green Albert Mears v. State of Florida (2016)
Rule Authority · Fla. Dist. Ct. App. · 2 citations in this opinion
“It is well settled that a prosecutor must confine closing argument to evidence in the record, and must refrain from comments that could not be reasonably inferred from the evidence.” Ford v. State, 702 So.2d 279, 280 (Fla. 4th DCA 1997).
green Vilseis v. State (2013)
Rule Authority · Fla. Dist. Ct. App.
As to other issues raised on appeal, we agree with the defendant that on retrial Deputy Johnson-Stinnett should be precluded from testifying (1) that she knew of the defendant’s name because she “was told on scene the name of him,” and (2) that the “other deputies that were there [knew the defendant’s] family from other dealings.” The former statement is hearsay and the latter is inadmissible at trial because the implication that a defendant or his family has been involved “…
quoting Straight v. State, 397 So.2d 903, 908 (Fla.1981)
green Ford v. State (2011)
Rule Authority · Fla. Dist. Ct. App.
“It is well settled that a prosecutor must confine closing argument to evidence in the record, and must refrain from comments that could not be reasonably inferred from the evidence.” Ford v. State, 702 So.2d 279, 280 (Fla. 4th DCA 1997) (citing Huff v. State, 437 So.2d 1087, 1090 (Fla.1983)).
citing Huff v. State, 437 So.2d 1087, 1090 (Fla.1983)
green Rivero v. State (2000)
Rule Authority · Fla. Dist. Ct. App.
See Ruiz, 743 So.2d at 4 ; Ford v. State, 702 So.2d 279, 280 (Fla. 4th DCA 1997).
green Jones v. State (1999)
Rule Authority · Fla. Dist. Ct. App.
Ford v. State, 702 So.2d 279, 280 (Fla. 4th DCA 1997).
green Williams v. State (2009)
Cited · Fla. Dist. Ct. App. · signal: see · 2 citations in this opinion
See Ford v. State, 702 So.2d 279 (Fla. 4th DCA 1997); Stewart v. State, 622 So.2d 51, 56 (Fla. 5th DCA 1993) (concluding that defendant was entitled to new trial where the prosecutor’s statement clearly suggested that the State had additional evidence and proof of the defendant’s guilt that it had not provided to the jury, and the curative instruction did little to dispel the suggestion); Landry v. State, 620 So.2d 1099, 1102 (Fla. 4th DCA 1993); Thompson v. State, 318 So.2d…
green McKenzie v. State (2002)
Cited · Fla. Dist. Ct. App. · signal: see · 2 citations in this opinion
See Ford v. State, 702 So.2d 279, 280 (Fla. 4th DCA 1997).
green Isom v. State (2012)
Cited · Fla. Dist. Ct. App. · signal: see
See Ford v. State, 702 So.2d 279, 280 (Fla. 4th DCA 1997).