Kentucky v. Hamilton (1984)

See also, e. g., Wellman v. Faulkner, 715 F. 2d 269, 274 (CA7 1983), cert. denied, 468 U. S. 1217 (1984); Ramos v. Lamm, 639 F. 2d 559, 573, n. 19 (CA10 1980), cert. denied, 450 U. S. 1041 (1981); Battle v. Anderson, 564 F. 2d 388, 396 (CA10 1977); Gates v. Collier, 501 F. 2d 1291, 1319 (CA5 1974).

See, e. g., United States v. Tranowski, 702 F. 2d 668, 671 (CA7 1983) (concluding that policy arguments favor including tainted evidence in insufficiency analysis), cert. denied, 468 U. S. 1217 (1984); Bullard v. Estelle, 665 F. 2d 1347, 1358-1361 (CA5 1982) (using similar interest analysis in case involving retrial for sentence enhancement and concluding that inadmissible evidence should not be included in insufficiency analysis).

See Wellman v. Faulkner, 715 F.2d 269, 272-74 (7th Cir.1983) (deliberate indifference at state prison evidenced not only by “repeated instances” of medical maltreatment, but also “general systemic deficiencies,” such as doctors who did not speak English, no psychiatric care, and problems in providing medical supplies like waste-collection bags for inmates who had colostomies), cert. denied, 468 U.S. 1217 , 104 S.Ct. 3587 , 82 L.Ed.2d 885 (1984).

See Wellman v. Faulkner, 715 F.2d 269, 272-74 (7th Cir.1983) (deliberate indifference at state prison evidenced not only by "repeated instances" of medical maltreatment, but also "general systemic deficiencies," such as doctors who did not speak English, no psychiatric care, and problems in providing medical supplies like waste-collection bags for inmates who had colostomies), cert. denied, 468 U.S. 1217 , 104 S.Ct. 3587 , 82 L.Ed.2d 885 (1984).

See, e.g., Wellman v. Faulkner, 715 F.2d 269, 272 (7th Cir.1983), cert. denied, 468 U.S. 1217 , 104 S.Ct. 3587 , 82 L.Ed.2d 885 (1984); Hoptowit v. Ray, 682 F.2d 1237, 1253 (9th Cir.1982); Ramos v. Lamm, 639 F.2d 559, 574 (10th Cir.1980), cert. denied, 450 U.S. 1041 , 101 S.Ct. 1759 , 68 L.Ed.2d 239 (1981); Inmates of Allegheny County Jail v. Pierce, 612 F.2d 754 , 763 (3d Cir.1979); Bowring v. Godwin, 551 F.2d 44, 47-48 (4th Cir.1977). 9 We accordingly hold that, at the tim…

See, e.g., Wellman v. Faulkner, 715 F.2d 269, 272 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 468 U.S. 1217 , 104 S. Ct. 3587 (1983) (recognizing that a pattern of negligent responses can evidence "deliberate indifference"). /6 The majority hints that a school’s response to complaints of harassment will only constitute "intentional discrimination" if it demonstrates an intent to foster a sexually hostile environment by stating that: the combination of knowledge that sexual harassment is occur…

See e.g., Wellman v. Faulkner, 715 F.2d 269, 272 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 468 U.S. 1217 , 104 S.Ct. 3587 (1983)(recognizing that a pattern of negligent responses can evidence "deliberate indifference") 6 The majority hints that a school's response to complaints of harassment will only constitute "intentional discrimination" if it demonstrates an intent to foster a sexually hostile environment by stating that: the combination of knowledge that sexual harassment is occurring …

See e.g., Wellman v. Faulkner, 715 F.2d 269, 272 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 468 U.S. 1217 , 104 S.Ct. 3587 (1983)(recognizing that a pattern of negligent responses can evidence "deliberate indifference”).

See Wellman v. Faulkner, 715 F.2d 269 (7th Cir. 1983) (failure to properly treat prisoner's heart condition resulted in death of prisoner), cert. denied, 468 U.S. 1217 (1984); Hughes v. Joliet Correctional Center, 931 F.2d 425 (7th Cir. 1991) (medical mistreatment of prisoner resulted in spinal injuries rendering prisoner unable to walk); Matzker v. Herr, 748 F.2d 1142, 1147 (7th Cir. 1984) (permanent physical injury to prisoner's teeth and eye sufficiently serious for eight…

See United States v. Gooday, 714 F.2d 80, 81-83 (9th Cir.1983) cert. denied, 468 U.S. 1217 , 104 S.Ct. 3587 , 82 L.Ed.2d 884 (1984); Forsberg v. United States, 351 F.2d 242, 247-48 (9th Cir.1965), cert. denied, 383 U.S. 950 , 86 S.Ct. 1209 , 16 L.Ed.2d 212 (1966).

See id. at 104 , 97 S.Ct. at 291 ; see also Wellman v. Faulkner, 715 F.2d 269, 271 (7th Cir.1983) ("When a state imposes imprisonment as a punishment for crime, it accepts the obligation to provide persons in its custody with a medical care system that meets minimal standards of adequacy."), cert. denied, 468 U.S. 1217 , 104 S.Ct. 3587 , 82 L.Ed.2d 885 (1984).

See id. at 104 , 97 S.Ct. at 291 ; see also Wellman v. Faulkner, 715 F.2d 269, 271 (7th Cir.1983) (“When a state imposes imprisonment as a punishment for crime, it accepts the obligation to provide persons in its custody with a medical care system that meets minimal standards of adequacy.”), cert. denied, 468 U.S. 1217 , 104 S.Ct. 3587 , 82 L.Ed.2d 885 (1984).

See Wilkins v. Whitaker, 714 F.2d 4, 6 (4th Cir.1983), cert. denied, 468 U.S. 1217 (1984).

See also United States v. Aimone, 715 F.2d 822, 826 (3d Cir.1983), cert. denied, 468 U.S. 1217 , 104 S.Ct. 3585 , 82 L.Ed.2d 883 (1984).

See United States v. Aimone, 715 F.2d 822, 833 (3d Cir.1983), aff'g United States v. Musto, 540 F.Supp. 318, 340 (D.N.J.1982), cert. denied, 468 U.S. 1217 , 104 S.Ct. 3586 , 82 L.Ed.2d 883 (1984). .

See United States v. Aimone, 715 F.2d 822, 833 (3d Cir.1983), aff'g United States v. Musto, 540 F.Supp. 318, 340 (D.N.J.1982), cert. denied, 468 U.S. 1217 , 104 S.Ct. 3586 , 82 L.Ed.2d 883 (1984) 48 Section 1918(b) provides that: Whenever any conviction for any offense not capital is obtained in a district court, the court may order that the defendant pay the costs of prosecution. 49 Carter-Glogau and the government disagree whether payment of the costs of prosecution may be…

See Wilkins v. Whitaker, 714 F.2d 4 (4th Cir.1983), cert. denied, 468 U.S. 1217 (1984); N.C.Gen.Stat.

See Wellman v. Faulkner, 715 F.2d 269 (7th Cir.1983), cert. den. 468 U.S. 1217 , 104 S.Ct. 3587 , 82 L.Ed.2d 885 (1984).

See Wellman v. Faulkner, 715 F.2d 269 (7th Cir.1983), cert. den. 468 U.S. 1217 , 104 S.Ct. 3587 , 82 L.Ed.2d 885 (1984).

See also United States v. Aimone, 715 F.2d 822, 828 (3d Cir.1983) (four individuals and one corporation constitute an enterprise), cert. denied, 468 U.S. 1217 , 104 S.Ct. 3585 , 82 L.Ed.2d 883 (1984); United States v. Huber, 603 F.2d 387, 394 (2d Cir.1979) (group of corporations properly an enterprise), ce rt. denied, 445 U.S. 927 , 100 S.Ct. 1312 , 63 L.Ed.2d 759 (1980).

See Wilkins v. Whitaker, 714 F.2d 4 , 7 n. 1 (4th Cir.1983), cert. denied, 468 U.S. 1217 (1984). 3 We affirm the district court's dismissal of all the defendants whose names did not appear on the face of the EEOC charge except G.

See, e.g., Wellman v. Faulkner, 715 F.2d 269, 272 (7th Cir.1983), cert. denied, 468 U.S. 1217 , 104 S.Ct. 3587 , 82 L.Ed.2d 885 (1984); Hoptowit v. Ray, 682 F.2d 1237, 1253 (9th Cir.1982); Ramos v. Lamm, 639 F.2d 559, 574 (10th Cir.1980), cert. denied, 450 U.S. 1041 , 101 S.Ct. 1759 , 68 L.Ed.2d 239 (1981); Inmates of Allegheny County Jail v. Pierce, 612 F.2d 754 , 763 (3d Cir.1979); Bowring v. Godwin, 551 F.2d 44 , 47–48 (4th Cir.1977).

See Cmwlth. v. Santner , 308 Pa.Super. 67 , 454 A.2d 24 , 25 n.2 (1982), cert. denied , 468 U.S. 1217 , 104 S.Ct. 3585 , 82 L.Ed.2d 883 (1984) (citing Marron v. United States , 275 U.S. 192 , 195, 48 S.Ct. 74 , 72 L.Ed. 231 (1927) ).

The court properly concluded that defendant’s statements given at the police station and the evidence seized from the apartment upon the execution of the search warrant were not causally related to the earlier illegal entry into defendant’s apartment (see People v Boyson, 105 AD3d 1364, 1364 , lv denied 22 NY3d 1039 ; see generally People v Arnau, 58 NY2d 27, 33 , cert denied 468 US 1217 ).

The court properly concluded that defendant’s statements given at the police station and the evidence seized from the apartment upon the execution of the search warrant were not causally related to the earlier illegal entry into defendant’s apartment (see People v Boyson, 105 AD3d 1364, 1364 [2013], lv denied 22 NY3d 1039 [2013]; see generally People v Arnau, 58 NY2d 27, 33 [1982], cert denied 468 US 1217 [1984]).

The court properly concluded that defendant’s statements given at the police station and the evidence seized from the apartment upon the execution of the search warrant were not causally related to the earlier illegal entry into defendant’s apartment (see People v Boyson, 105 AD3d 1364, 1364 [2013], lv denied 22 NY3d 1039 [2013]; see generally People v Arnau, 58 NY2d 27, 33 [1982], cert denied 468 US 1217 [1984]).

See, e.g., United States v. Gooday, 714 F.2d 80, 88 (9th Cir. 1983), cert. denied, 468 U.S. 1217 (1984); Griffin v. State, 717 N.E.2d 73, 82 (Ind. 1999), cert. denied, 530 U.S. 1247 (2000); State v. Grabowski, 644 A.2d 1282, 1286 (R.I. 1994).

See, e.g., United States v. Gooday, 714 F. 2d 80, 82-83 (9th Cir.1983), cert. denied, 468 U.S. 1217 , 104 S.Ct. 3587 , 82 L.Ed. 2d 884 (1984); State v. Russell, 101 Wash. 2d 349 , 678 P. 2d 332, 335 (1984); Stone v. Superior Court, 31 Cal. 3d 503 , 183 Cal.Rptr. 647 , 646 P. 2d 809, 822 (1982).

While the newspapers from which the police later obtained the defendant’s fingerprints may not have been lawfully seized under the plain-view doctrine because their incriminating nature was not immediately apparent, the information derived from them—that the defendant was the occupant of room 210—was, in fact, subsequently obtained by the police from a variety of independent sources (see People v Good win, 286 AD2d 935 [2001]; see generally People v Arnau, 58 NY2d 27, 32-33 …

We note in addition “that securing a dwelling, on the basis of probable cause, to prevent the destruction or removal of evidence while a search warrant is being sought is not itself an unreasonable seizure of either the dwelling or its contents” (Segura v United States, 468 US 796, 810 [1984]; see generally People v Arnau, 58 NY2d 27, 36-37 [1982], cert denied after remand 468 US 1217 [1984]).

See, e.g., United States v. Gooday, 714 F.2d 80, 83 (9th Cir. 1983), cert. denied, 468 U.S. 1217 (1984); People v. Kettler, 112 Ill.

See, e.g., United States v. Gooday, 714 F.2d 80, 83 (9th Cir. 1983), cert. denied, 468 U.S. 1217 , 104 S. Ct. 3587 , 82 L.

See, e.g., United States v. Gooday, 714 F.2d 80, 82-83 (9th Cir.1983), cert. denied, 468 U.S. 1217 , 104 S.Ct. 3587 , 82 L.Ed.2d 884 (1984).

Generally, when the police have *162 acted illegally, evidence which " 'has been come at by exploitation of that illegality’ ” should be suppressed (Wong Sun v United States, 371 US 471, 488 ; see, People v Arnau, 58 NY2d 27, 32 , cert denied 468 US 1217 ; People v Boodle, 47 NY2d 398, 402 , cert denied 444 US 969 ).

See Todaro v. Ward, 565 F.2d 48, 52 ; see also Wellman v. Faulkner, 715 F.2d 269, 272 (7th Cir.1983), cert. denied, 468 U.S. 1217 , 104 S.Ct. 3587 , 82 L.Ed.2d 885 ; Ramos v. Lamm, 639 F.2d 559, 575 (10th Cir.1980).

See United States v. Gooday, 714 F.2d 80, 83 (9th Cir.1983) (holding that, where defendant was acquitted of first degree murder and jury was unable to reach a verdict on three lesser included offenses, double jeopardy did not bar retrial on the lesser included offenses), cert. denied, 468 U.S. 1217 , 104 S.Ct. 3587 , 82 L.Ed.2d 884 (1984).

See also Wellman v. Faulkner, 715 F.2d 269 (7th Cir.1983), cert. denied, 468 U.S. 1217 , 104 S.Ct. 3587 , 82 L.Ed.2d 885 (1984).

Moreover, even if the warrant was invalid and the presence of the police on the scene illegal, defendant’s actions in climbing the stairs behind an officer and dropping contraband in full view of another officer were voluntary, independent, and unrelated to any illegal police conduct (see, People v Boodle, 47 NY2d 398, 402-404 , cert denied 444 US 969 ; see also, People v Arnau, 58 NY2d 27, 32-38 , cert denied 468 US 1217 ).

See Wellman v. Faulkner, 715 F.2d 269, 275 (7th Cir.1983), cert. denied, 468 U.S. 1217 , 104 S.Ct. 3587 , 82 L.Ed.2d 885 (1984); Crowder v. Lash, 687 F.2d 996, 1005 (7th Cir.1982).

It should be noted that although the Supreme Court has explicitly left this precise question open, see Greene v. Massey, 437 U.S. 19 , 27 n. 9, 98 S.Ct. 2151 , 2155 n. 9, 57 L.Ed.2d 15 (1978), the circuit courts of appeal that have considered it have held that when evaluating a double jeopardy challenge to a retrial order after reversal of a conviction for trial error "all the evidence presented at the initial trial — even that later found to be unconstitutionally admitted m…

See Wellman v. Faulkner, 715 F.2d 269 (7th Cir.1983), cert. den., 468 U.S. 1217 , 104 S.Ct. 3587 , 82 L.Ed.2d 885 (1984).

Va. 1981); accord, United States v. Tranowski, 702 F.2d 668 (7th Cir. 1983), cert. denied, 468 U.S. 1217 , 104 S. Ct. 3586 , 82 L.