Aves Ex Rel. Aves v. Shah (1995)
green
· 107 citation events
across 10 courts.
Showing the 18 strongest citers on record
(one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).
Treatment trajectory · 1995 → 2026 · click a year to view the case as of then
199520102026
Sort:
By significance ·
Most recent
green
Progressive Northwestern Ins v. Gant (2020)
Aves, 906 P.2d at 648 (“If the insurer negligently or in bad faith refuses to settle a case within the policy limits, the insurer has breached . . . the insurance contract.”).
“If the insurer negligently or in bad faith refuses to settle a case within the policy limits, the insurer has breached . . . the insurance contract.”
green
Teran v. GB International, S.P.A. (2016)
Aves v. Shah, 258 Kan. 506 , 906 P.2d 642, 652 (1995). 8 Mr. Teran alleges *669 unequal bargaining power without alleging a deceptive practice.
green
Miller v. Johnson (2012)
Co., 252 Kan. 1010, 1022-23 , 850 P.2d 773 (1993) (K.S.A. 60- 3802 violated equal protection by allowing evidence of collateral source benefits in personal injury cases when plaintiff sought more than $150,000 in damages); Smith v. Printup, 254 Kan. 315, 332-33 , 866 P.2d 985 (1993) (K.S.A. 60-3701 et seq., does not violate right to jury trial by requiring courts to decide punitive damages); Aves v. Shah, 258 Kan. 506, 524, 527 , 906 P.2d 642 (1995) (K.S.A. 40-3403[e] and K.…
K.S.A. 40-3403[e] and K.S.A. 40-3412[c] do not violate Section 18 due process or equal protection by prohibiting bad faith actions against the Health Care Stabilization Fund
green
Granados v. Wilson (2023)
See Aves v. Shah, 258 Kan. 506, 511 , 906 P.2d 642 (1995) ("In Kansas, insurance policies are typically considered contracts.").
"In Kansas, insurance policies are typically considered contracts."
green
L2 Wireless v. Sprint Solutions Inc (2019)
Aves v. Shah, 258 Kan. 506, 520 (1995)) (“Mere inequality of bargaining power is ORDER – PAGE 11 insufficient to render a contract unconscionable.”); Adams v. John Deere Co., 13 Kan.App.2d 489, 494 (Kan.
quoting Wille, 219 Kan. at 759
green
Hilburn v. Enerpipe Ltd. (2019)
See Miller, 295 Kan. at 663 (holding medical malpractice insurance minimums mandated by state law provided substitute for limitation on noneconomic damages); Lemuz, 261 Kan. at 959 (holding medical malpractice insurance minimums mandated by state law provided substitute for ban on corporate negligence claim against hospital providing staff privileges to tortfeasor-doctor); Aves, 258 Kan. at 523-24 (holding medical malpractice minimums mandated by state law provided substitut…
holding medical malpractice minimums mandated by state law provided substitute remedy for bar on bad-faith refusal claims against state-run excess liability insurance fund
green
John David Wurdemann v. State (2017)
When a claimant alleges ineffective assistance of counsel based on counsel’s failure to file a motion, a “critical inquiry is whether the motion, if filed, should have been granted....” State v. Dunlap, 155 Idaho 345, 385 , 313 P.3d 1, 41 (2013); Payne, 146 Idaho at 562 , 199 P.3d at 137 (2008) (“Where the alleged deficiency is counsel’s failure to file a motion, a conclusion that the motion, if pur *718 sued, would not have been granted by the trial court, is generally dete…
green
Attorney General Opinion No. (2008)
App.2d 1029 (2008). 10 L. 2001, ch. 208 , § 15. 11 L. 2001, ch. 208 , § 10. 12 L. 2002, ch. 55 , § 1. 13 State v. McAdam , 277 Kan. 136 , 146 (2004). 14 K.S.A. 22-4906 (c)-(h). 15 Aves v. Shah , 258 Kan. 506 , 512-13 (1995). 16 Id. at 513. 17 Minutes , House Judiciary Committee, March 20, 2007.
As the court noted previously in this case, “an insurance contract contains an implied term that if the insurer assumes the defense of an insured, then the insurer ‘owes to an insured the duty to act in good faith and without negligence.’ ” Aves By and Through Aves v. Shah, 258 Kan. 506 , 906 P.2d 642, 648 (1995) (quoting Bollinger v. Nuss, 202 Kan. 326 , Syl. ¶ 1, 449 P.2d 502 (1969)).
quoting Bollinger v. Nuss, 202 Kan. 326 , Syl. ¶ 1, 449 P.2d 502 (1969)
Aves v. Shah, 258 Kan. 506, 520 , 906 P.2d 642, 652 (1995); Frets v. Capitol Fed.
Aves v. Shah, 258 Kan. 506, 511-12, 906 P.2d 642 (1995); see Guarantee Abstract & Title Co. v. Interstate Fire & Cas.
green
State v. Denney (2004)
See also Aves v. Shah, 258 Kan. 506, 526-27 , 906 P.2d 642 (1995) (Cutting costs, by itself, is not a legitimate State interest, and the rational basis test is not met.).
Cutting costs, by itself, is not a legitimate State interest, and the rational basis test is not met.
See Aves v. Shah, 258 Kan. 506, 519 , 906 P.2d 642 (1995) (holding bad faith on the part of the Fund in refusing to settle a claim merely to avoid paying a large settlement does not give rise to an action against the Fund by the health care provider for damages). *257 With certain exceptions not applicable to this case, the Act provides that it is the Fund, not the provider, which is responsible for paying any difference above the coverage of the liability insurance.
holding bad faith on the part of the Fund in refusing to settle a claim merely to avoid paying a large settlement does not give rise to an action against the Fund by the health care provider for damages
green
Sours v. Russell (1998)
See Aves v. Shah, 258 Kan. 506, 512 , 906 P.2d 642 (1995); Gilley, 207 Kan. at 544 ; annot., 60 A.L.R.3d 1190 , 1196, 1199.
green
Wolverton v. Bullock (1998)
See Aves v. Shah, 258 Kan. at 512 , 906 P.2d 642 (a contract must have existed for there to be a bad faith breach of contract action).
green
Oatis v. Armbrister (2024)
See Aves By & Through Aves v. Shah, 906 P.2d 642, 651 (Kan. 1995) (analyzing Section 40-2412(c) as an attempt “to prevent common-law bad faith claims”); Marshall v. Kan- sas Med.
analyzing Section 40-2412(c) as an attempt “to prevent common-law bad faith claims”
green
Lemuz Ex Rel. Lemuz v. Fieser (1997)
See Aves, 258 Kan. at 508 .