How cited: Elephant Butte Irrigation District v. Regents of New Mexico State University · Go Syfert

Elephant Butte Irrigation District v. Regents of New Mexico State University (1993)

green · 55 citation events across 6 courts. Showing the 13 strongest citers on record (one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).
All Green 13
Treatment trajectory · 1996 → 2026 · click a year to view the case as of then
199620112026
Sort: By significance · Most recent
green United States v. City of Las Cruces (2002)
Rule Authority · 10th Cir. · 5 citations in this opinion
State Univ., 115 N.M. 229, 849 P.2d 372, 374 (App.1993).
green Walker v. United States (2008)
Quote Authority · Fed. Cl. · 4 citations in this opinion
Dist., 849 P.2d at 375-76 (“[I]ndividuals seeking to appropriate water after [March 19, 1907] are required to seek a permit from the [S]tate [E]ngineer.”); see also N.M.
“[I]ndividuals seeking to appropriate water after [March 19, 1907] are required to seek a permit from the [S]tate [E]ngineer.”
green New Mexico v. General Electric Co. (2004)
Rule Authority · D.N.M. · 3 citations in this opinion
Dist. v. Regents of New Mexico State University, 115 N.M. 229, 232-33 , 849 P.2d 372, 375-76 (Ct.App.1993).
green Williams v. Board of County Commissioners (1998)
Rule Authority · N.M. Ct. App. · 3 citations in this opinion
State Univ., 115 N.M. 229, 238 , 849 P.2d 372, 381 (Ct.App.1993) (word “shall” is mandatory).
green Cooper v. Chevron U.S.A., Inc. (2002)
Rule Authority · N.M. · 2 citations in this opinion
State Univ., 115 N.M. 229, 238 , 849 P.2d 372, 381 (Ct.App.1993) ("Water rights are real property rights that are generally tied to specific land.
green Rosette, Inc. v. United States of Department of the Interior (2007)
Rule Authority · N.M. Ct. App.
State Univ., 115 N.M. 229, 233-34 , 849 P.2d 372, 376-77 (Ct.App.1993) (stating that New Mexico’s adjudication statutes require the joinder of all claimants to avoid piecemeal litigation).
green Montgomery v. Lomos Altos, Inc. (2006)
Rule Authority · N.M.
State Univ., 115 N.M. 229, 235 , 849 P.2d 372, 378 (Ct.App.1993).
green Starko, Inc. v. Cimarron Health Plan, Inc. (2005)
Rule Authority · N.M. Ct. App.
State Univ., 115 N.M. 229, 236 , 849 P.2d 372, 379 (Ct.App.1993), holding that the case was pending from the time the original complaint was filed, even after state court jurisdiction was suspended following removal to federal court.
green Mannick v. Wakeland (2005)
Rule Authority · N.M. Ct. App.
State Univ., 115 N.M. 229, 238 , 849 P.2d 372, 381 (Ct.App.1993).
green Mannick v. Wakeland (2004)
Rule Authority · N.M. Ct. App.
State Univ., 115 N.M. 229, 238 , 849 P.2d 372, 381 (Ct.App. 1993).
green State Ex Rel. Martinez v. City of Las Vegas (2004)
Rule Authority · N.M.
State Univ., 115 N.M. 229, 233-34 , 849 P.2d 372, 376-77 (Ct.App.1993).
green US West Communications, Inc. v. New Mexico Public Regulation Commission (1999)
Rule Authority · N.M.
State Univ., 115 N.M. 229, 237 , 849 P.2d 372, 380 (Ct. App. 1993) (citing Brown v. Board of Educ., 81 N.M. 460 , 468 P.2d 431 (Ct. App. 1970)). {14} In all of these situations, the guiding principle underlying the courts’ definition of a “pending case” has been that: The evident intention of [Article IV, Section 34 of] the [New Mexico] Constitution is to prevent legislative interference with matters of evidence and procedure in cases that are in the process or course of lit…
citing Brown v. Board of Educ., 81 N.M. 460 , 468 P.2d 431 (Ct. App. 1970)
green Gilmore v. Duderstadt (1998)
Cited · N.M. Ct. App. · signal: see · 2 citations in this opinion
See Elephant Butte Irrigation Dist. v. Regents of New Mexico State Univ., 115 N.M. 229, 232 , 849 P.2d 372, 375 (Ct.App.1993) (“[T]he law of the case doctrine applies to issues raised on remand that were addressed and decided at the appellate level.”).