In Re the Appeal in Pima County Juvenile Dependency Action No. 96290 (1990)

green · 32 citation events across 1 courts. Showing the 17 strongest citers on record (one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).

All Green 17

Treatment trajectory · 1992 → 2026 · click a year to view the case as of then

199220092026

Sort: By significance · Most recent

green Francine C. v. Dcs (2020)

Rule Authority · Ariz. Ct. App. · 2 citations in this opinion

Dependency Action No. 96290, 162 Ariz. 601, 604 (App. 1990) (imminent risk of harm).

imminent risk of harm

green Shella H. v. Dcs (2015)

Quote Authority · Ariz. Ct. App. · 2 citations in this opinion

Dependency Action No. 96290, 162 Ariz. 601, 605 (App. 1990) (“A 6 Absent material revisions from the relevant date, we cite a statute’s current version. 5 SHELLA H. v. DCS, et al.

“A 6 Absent material revisions from the relevant date, we cite a statute’s current version. 5 SHELLA H. v. DCS, et al. Decision of the Court finding of dependency may be predicated on one parent’s failure to prevent abuse by another parent.”

green Handy v. Shaw (2026)

Rule Authority · Ariz. Ct. App.

Dependency Action No. 96290, 162 Ariz. 601, 604 (App. 1990) (explaining in a dependency action that parents’ present denial of responsibility for past abuse and neglect supports a finding they are not “presently willing to or capable of exercising proper and effective parental care and control”); see Shella H. v. Dep’t of Child Safety, 239 Ariz. 47 , 51 ¶¶ 16–17 (App. 2016) (holding in dependency that “domestic violence need not be continuous or actively occurring” if it rem…

explaining in a dependency action that parents’ present denial of responsibility for past abuse and neglect supports a finding they are not “presently willing to or capable of exercising proper and effective parental care and control”

green Dias v. Mady (2024)

Quote Authority · Ariz. Ct. App.

Dependency Action No. 96290, 162 Ariz. 601, 604 (App. 1990) (“[D]enial of responsibility supports a finding” that the parent is not “presently willing to or capable of exercising proper and effective parental care and control.”).

“[D]enial of responsibility supports a finding” that the parent is not “presently willing to or capable of exercising proper and effective parental care and control.”

green In Re Dependency as to S v. (2024)

Rule Authority · Ariz. Ct. App.

Dependency Action No. 96290, 162 Ariz. 601, 605 (App. 1990)). ¶11 Here, reasonable evidence supports the court’s finding of dependency.

green In Re Dependency as to M.D. (2023)

Rule Authority · Ariz. Ct. App.

Dependency Action No. 96290, 162 Ariz. 601, 604 (App. 1990).

green In Re Dependency as to R.G. (2023)

Rule Authority · Ariz. Ct. App.

Dependency Action No. 96290, 162 Ariz. 601, 604 (App. 1990); see also Shella H., 239 Ariz. at 51 ¶ 16.

green La'nikki G. v. Dcs, L.E. (2022)

Rule Authority · Ariz. Ct. App.

Dependency Action No. 96290, 162 Ariz. 601, 604 (App. 1990) (failing to remedy the causes of past abuse and neglect may suggest a parent is not “presently willing to or capable of exercising proper and effective parental care and control”).

failing to remedy the causes of past abuse and neglect may suggest a parent is not “presently willing to or capable of exercising proper and effective parental care and control”

green Camare M. v. Dcs (2022)

Rule Authority · Ariz. Ct. App.

Dependency Action No. 96290, 162 Ariz. 601, 604 (App. 1990). ¶10 This court reviews a dependency finding for abuse of discretion and will affirm the order unless no reasonable evidence supports the factual findings upon which it is based.

green Juliette F. v. Dcs (2021)

Rule Authority · Ariz. Ct. App.

Dependency Action No. 96290, 162 Ariz. 601, 604 (App. 1990). 4 JULIETTE F. v. DCS et al.

green Jamie F. v. Dcs, D.S. (2021)

Rule Authority · Ariz. Ct. App.

Dependency Action No. 96290, 162 Ariz. 601, 604 (App. 1990) (explaining that when “conditions creating the dependency . . . pose an imminent risk of harm,” DCS is not required to wait for further injury to be inflicted).

explaining that when “conditions creating the dependency . . . pose an imminent risk of harm,” DCS is not required to wait for further injury to be inflicted

green Mark O. v. Dcs, A.O. (2020)

Rule Authority · Ariz. Ct. App.

Dependency Action No. 96290, 162 Ariz. 601, 604 (App. 1990).

green Deborah S. v. Dcs, M.A. (2020)

Rule Authority · Ariz. Ct. App.

Dependency Action No. 96290, 162 Ariz. 601, 604-05 (App. 1990).

green Aaron W. v. Dcs (2019)

Rule Authority · Ariz. Ct. App.

Dependency Action No. 96290, 162 Ariz. 601, 604 (App. 1990) (imminent risk of harm).

imminent risk of harm

green Eugene W. v. Dcs, P.W. (2016)

Rule Authority · Ariz. Ct. App.

Dependency Action No. 96290, 162 Ariz. 601, 604 , 785 P.2d 121, 124 (App. 1990); Pima Cty.

green Shella H. v. Department of Child Safety (2016)

Cited · Ariz. Ct. App. · signal: see · 2 citations in this opinion

See 96290, 162 Ariz. at 604 , 785 P.2d 121 (rejecting argument that juvenile court erred in adjudicating a child dependent when he was born after events giving rise to a finding of dependency for his older siblings, and noting instead that “[ajssuming that the state can prove the conditions creating the dependency as to the older children, and that those conditions pose an imminent risk of harm to the newborn, the statute does not preclude the state from acting to protect th…

green Adrian B. v. Dcs (2019)

Cited (see also) · Ariz. Ct. App. · signal: see also

See id. at ¶¶ 16- 17; see also Pima County Juvenile Dependency Action No. 96290, 162 Ariz. 601, 604-05 (App. 1990).