In Re Ivey (2003)
green
· 110 citation events
across 2 courts.
Showing the 28 strongest citers on record
(one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).
Treatment trajectory · 2003 → 2026 · click a year to view the case as of then
200320142026
Sort:
By significance ·
Most recent
green
Henderson v. Henderson (2014)
App. 398, 403, 576 S.E.2d 386, 390 (2003) (holding that the respondent-parents *141 waived their argument that certain testimony constituted inadmissible hearsay because they failed to object to the testimony at the permanency planning hearing); see also In re F.G.J., 200 N.C.
holding that the respondent-parents *141 waived their argument that certain testimony constituted inadmissible hearsay because they failed to object to the testimony at the permanency planning hearing
green
In re F.G.J. & M.G.J. (2009)
App. 398, 403-04 , 576 S.E.2d 386, 390 (2003) (holding that respondent parents waived claim that testimony constituted hearsay when they failed to object at trial on grounds of hearsay).
holding that respondent parents waived claim that testimony constituted hearsay when they failed to object at trial on grounds of hearsay
green
In the Matter of Kk (2009)
App. 398, 402 , 576 S.E.2d 386, 390 (2003).
green
In Re Sh (2004)
App. 398, 401 , 576 S.E.2d 386, 389 (2003) ("Without [a juvenile] petition, the trial court did not have the jurisdiction to order DSS to assume nonsecure custody of [the child].").
"Without [a juvenile] petition, the trial court did not have the jurisdiction to order DSS to assume nonsecure custody of [the child]."
green
IN RE SH (2004)
See In re Ivey, 156 N.C.
"Without [a juvenile] petition, the trial court did not have the jurisdiction to order DSS to assume nonsecure custody of [the child]."
green
In re N. B. (2004)
App. 398, 401 , 576 S.E.2d 386, 389 (2003) (“trial court erred in [entering order for non-secure custody] . . . where no petition had been filed and the trial court did not have jurisdiction over the child”); In re Triscari Children, 109 N.C.
“trial court erred in [entering order for non-secure custody] . . . where no petition had been filed and the trial court did not have jurisdiction over the child”
green
In Re NB (2004)
See In re Ivey, 156 N.C.App. 398, 401 , 576 S.E.2d 386, 389 (2003) ("trial court erred in [entering order for non-secure custody] ... where no petition had been filed and the trial court did not have jurisdiction over the child"); In re Triscari Children, 109 N.C.App. 285 , 426 S.E.2d 435 (1993) (termination of parental rights order vacated for lack of subject matter jurisdiction where petition not verified).
"trial court erred in [entering order for non-secure custody] ... where no petition had been filed and the trial court did not have jurisdiction over the child"
green
In Re McKinney (2003)
App. 398, 401 , 576 S.E.2d 386, 389 (2003) (“[T]he trial court erred in [entering order for non-secure custody] . . . where no petition had been filed and the trial court did not have jurisdiction over the child.”); In re Triscari Children, 109 N.C.
“[T]he trial court erred in [entering order for non-secure custody] . . . where no petition had been filed and the trial court did not have jurisdiction over the child.”
green
In re J.N.S. (2010)
App. 398, 402 , 576 S.E.2d 386, 390 (2003) (internal quotation omitted).
internal quotation omitted
green
In Re JNS (2010)
In dispositional hearings, "trial courts may properly consider all written reports and materials submitted in connection with said proceedings." In re Ivey, 156 N.C.App. 398, 402 , 576 S.E.2d 386, 390 (2003) (internal quotation omitted).
internal quotation omitted
green
In Re Jo. Ap (2008)
App. 398, 402 , 576 S.E.2d 386, 390 (2003).
green
In the Matter of Sw (2008)
App. 398, 401 , 576 S.E.2d 386, 389 (2003).
green
In the Matter of Dd (2007)
App. 398, 402 , 576 S.E.2d 386, 390 (2003).
green
In Re RAH (2007)
Respondent's related contention that the findings of fact made prior to reversal could not be relied upon by the trial court is simply incorrect. [2] To the contrary, "[i]n juvenile proceedings, trial courts may properly consider all written reports and materials submitted in connection with said proceedings." In re Ivey, 156 N.C.App. 398, 402-03 , 576 S.E.2d 386, 390 (2003) (quoting In re Shue, 63 N.C.App. 76, 79 , 303 S.E.2d 636, 638 (1983), modified and aff'd, 311 N.C. 58…
quoting In re Shue, 63 N.C.App. 76, 79 , 303 S.E.2d 636, 638 (1983), modified and aff'd, 311 N.C. 586 , 319 S.E.2d 567 (1984)
green
In the Matter of Rw (2007)
App. 398, 402 , 576 S.E.2d 386, 390 (2003).
green
In Re AP (2006)
See In re J.S., 165 N.C.App. 509, 511 , 598 S.E.2d 658, 660 (2004); In re Ivey, 156 N.C.App. 398, 402-03 , 576 S.E.2d 386, 389-90 (2003).
green
In the Matter of Kw (2006)
App. 398, 402 , 576 S.E.2d 386, 390 (2003) (quoting In re Shue, 63 N.C.
quoting In re Shue, 63 N.C. App. 76, 79 , 303 S.E.2d 636, 638 (1983), modified and affirmed, 311 N.C. 586 , 319 S.E.2d 567 (1984)
green
In re M.J.G. (2005)
App. 398, 402 , 576 S.E.2d 386, 389-90 (2003), this Court considered the argument that the trial court erroneously rendered findings of fact in a permanency planning hearing based upon reports that were not admitted into evidence.
green
In Re MJG (2005)
In In re Ivey, 156 N.C.App. 398, 402 , 576 S.E.2d 386, 389-90 (2003), this Court considered the argument that the trial court erroneously rendered findings of fact in a permanency planning hearing based upon reports that were not admitted into evidence.
green
In Re M.R.D.C. (2004)
App. 398, 402 , 576 S.E.2d 386, 390 (2003)).
green
In re J.S. (2004)
App. 398, 402 , 576 S.E.2d 386, 390 (2003); N.C.
green
In Re JS (2004)
In re Ivey, 156 N.C.App. 398, 402 , 576 S.E.2d 386, 390 (2003); N.C.
green
In Re SJM (2007)
See In re Ivey, 156 N.C.App. 398, 402 , 576 S.E.2d 386, 390 (2003) (providing that "`[i]n juvenile proceedings, trial courts may properly consider all written reports and materials submitted in connection with said proceedings'" quoting In re Shue, 63 N.C.App. 76, 79 , 303 S.E.2d 636, 638 (1983)).
providing that "`[i]n juvenile proceedings, trial courts may properly consider all written reports and materials submitted in connection with said proceedings'" quoting In re Shue, 63 N.C.App. 76, 79 , 303 S.E.2d 636, 638 (1983)
green
In re S.J.M. (2007)
See In re Ivey, 156 N.C.App. 398 , 402, 576 S.E.2d 386 , 390 (2003) (providing that "`[i]n juvenile proceedings, trial courts may properly consider all written reports and materials submitted in connection with said proceedings'" quoting In re Shue, 63 N.C.App. 76 , 79, 303 S.E.2d 636 , 638 (1983)).
providing that "`[i]n juvenile proceedings, trial courts may properly consider all written reports and materials submitted in connection with said proceedings'" quoting In re Shue, 63 N.C.App. 76 , 79, 303 S.E.2d 636 , 638 (1983)
green
In re Z.T.B. (2005)
In re McKinney, 158 N.C.App. 441 , 445, 581 S.E.2d 793 , 796 (2003); see also, In re Ivey, 156 N.C.App. 398 , 576 S.E.2d 386 (2003).
green
In Re ZTB (2005)
In re McKinney, 158 N.C.App. 441, 445 , 581 S.E.2d 793, 796 (2003); see also, In re Ivey, 156 N.C.App. 398 , 576 S.E.2d 386 (2003).
green
In re A.G.M. (2015)
See *432 In re Ivey, 156 N.C.App. 398 , 401, 576 S.E.2d 386 , 389 (2003).
green
In Re FGJ (2009)
See In re Ivey, 156 N.C.App. 398, 403-04 , 576 S.E.2d 386, 390 (2003) (holding that respondent parents waived claim that testimony constituted hearsay when they failed to object at trial on grounds of hearsay).
holding that respondent parents waived claim that testimony constituted hearsay when they failed to object at trial on grounds of hearsay