How cited: Studebaker Corporation v. Nail · Go Syfert

Studebaker Corporation v. Nail (1950)

green · 156 citation events across 14 courts. Showing the 34 strongest citers on record (one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).
All Green 34
Treatment trajectory · 1953 → 2026 · click a year to view the case as of then
195319892026
Sort: By significance · Most recent
green Harold Glenn Whitaker v. Harvell-Kilgore Corporation and Day & Zimmerman, Inc., Lura Madden Whitaker v. Harve… (1970)
Rule Authority · 5th Cir.
Macy & Co. v. Vest, 111 Ga.App. 85 , 140 S.E.2d 491, 492 (1965); Wood v. Hub Motor Co., 110 Ga.App. 101 , 137 S.E.2d 674, 681 (1964); Griffith v. Chevrolet Motor Div., 105 Ga.App. 588 , 125 S.E.2d 525, 528 (1962); Studebaker Corp. v. Nail, 82 Ga.App. 779 , 62 S.E. 2d 198, 202 (1950).
green Whitaker v. Harvell-Kilgore Corp. (1970)
Rule Authority · 5th Cir.
Macy & Co. v. Vest, 111 Ga.App. 85 , 140 S.E.2d 491, 492 (1965); Wood v. Hub Motor Co., 110 Ga.App. 101 , 137 S.E.2d 674, 681 (1964); Griffith v. Chevrolet Motor Div., 105 Ga.App. 588 , 125 S.E.2d 525, 528 (1962); Studebaker Corp. v. Nail, 82 Ga.App. 779 , 62 S.E.2d 198, 202 (1950).
green In re Porsche Cars North America, Inc. (2012)
Rule Authority · S.D. Ohio · 3 citations in this opinion
Chrysler Corp. v. Wilson Plumbing Co., Inc., 132 Ga.App. 435 , 208 S.E.2d 321, 323 (1974) (citing Studebaker Corp. v. Nail, 82 Ga.App. 779 , 62 S.E.2d 198, 202 (1950)); see also McQueen v. Minolta Bus.
green Kinlaw v. Long Mfg. N. C., Inc. (1979)
Rule Authority · N.C. Ct. App. · 2 citations in this opinion
Studebaker Corp. v. Nail, 82 Ga. App. 779, 783-84 , 62 S.E. 2d 198, 201-02 (1950).
green Hogan v. Olivera (1977)
Rule Authority · Ga. Ct. App. · 2 citations in this opinion
Likewise, Studebaker Corp. v. Nail, 82 Ga. App. 779, 785 ( 62 SE2d 198 ), is one for breach of warranty, and the party sued for specific damages.
green Thomas v. Campbell (1972)
Rule Authority · Ga. Ct. App. · 2 citations in this opinion
Co. v. Parmalee, 9 Ga. App. 725 ( 72 SE 191 ).' Studebaker Corp. v. Nail, 82 Ga. App. 779, 785 ( 62 SE2d 198 ); Davis v. Price, 72 Ga. App. 565 ( 34 SE2d 565 )." Williams & Templeton v. Brewer, 93 Ga. App. 603 (1) ( 92 SE2d 586 ).
green Williams & Templeton v. Brewer (1956)
Rule Authority · Ga. Ct. App. · 2 citations in this opinion
Co. v. Parmalee, 9 Ga. App. 725 ( 72 S. E. 191 ).” Studebaker Corp. v. Nail, 82 Ga. App. 779, 785 ( 62 S. E. 2d 198 ); Davis v. Price, 72 Ga. App. 565 ( 34 S. E. 2d 565 ). 2.
green Outdoor Systems, Inc. v. Woodson (1996)
Rule Authority · Ga. Ct. App.
“Where a party sues for specific damages he has the burden of showing the amount of loss claimed in such a way that the jury may calculate the amount of loss from the data furnished and will not be placed in a position where an allowance of the loss is based on guesswork. [Cit.]” Studebaker Corp. v. Nail, 82 Ga. App. 779, 785 (2) ( 62 SE2d 198 ) (1950).
green Daniels v. Johnson (1989)
Rule Authority · Ga. Ct. App.
OCGA § 51-12-2 (b); Development Corp. of Ga. v. Berndt, 131 Ga. App. 277, 278 ( 205 SE2d 868 ) (1974); Studebaker Corp. v. Nail, 82 Ga. App. 779, 785 (2) ( 62 SE2d 198 ) (1950); National Refrigerator &c.
green Stovall Tire & Marine, Inc. v. Prance Body & Fender Works (1986)
Rule Authority · Ga. Ct. App.
Hayes v. Flaum, 138 Ga. App. 787 ( 227 SE2d 512 ); Studebaker Corp. v. Nail, 82 Ga. App. 779, 785 ( 62 SE2d 198 ).
green Ingram v. Summerlin (1986)
Rule Authority · Ga. Ct. App.
Hayes v. Flaum, 138 Ga. App. 787 ( 227 SE2d 512 ); Studebaker Corp. v. Nail, 82 Ga. App. 779, 785 ( 62 SE2d 198 ).
green Pippin v. Burnum (1984)
Rule Authority · Ga. Ct. App.
Studebaker Corp. v. Nail, 82 Ga. App. 779, 785 ( 62 SE2d 198 ).” Harden v. Drost, 156 Ga. App. 363, 365 (2) ( 274 SE2d 748 ).
green Walker v. Bishop (1983)
Rule Authority · Ga. Ct. App.
While such a charge may be appropriate with reference to claims for special damages or attorney fees (see, e.g., Studebaker Corp. v. Nail, 82 Ga. App. 779, 785 ( 62 SE2d 198 ) (1950); Bennett v. Assoc.
green Adamson Co. v. Owens-Illinois Development Corp. (1983)
Rule Authority · Ga. Ct. App.
Studebaker Corp. v. Nail, 82 Ga. App. 779, 785 (2) ( 62 SE2d 198 ).
green Roland v. Byrd (1982)
Rule Authority · Ga. Ct. App.
Studebaker Corp. v. Nail, 82 Ga. App. 779, 785 ( 62 SE2d 198 ). “ ‘The measure of damages in the case of a breach of contract is the amount which will compensate the injured person for the loss which a fulfillment of the contract would have prevented or the breach of it entailed.
green Ayers v. Mobley (1982)
Rule Authority · Ga. Ct. App.
That is, he had the burden of proof of showing a loss to him which he failed to do, citing Big Builder, Inc. v. Evans, 126 Ga. App. 457, 458 ( 191 SE2d 290 ); Studebaker Corp. v. Nail, 82 Ga. App. 779, 785 ( 62 SE2d 198 ); and Smith v. Barfield, 157 Ga. App. 231, 232-233 (2) ( 276 SE2d 899 ); Hayes v. Flaum, 138 Ga. App. 787 ( 227 SE2d 512 ).
green Smith v. Barfield (1981)
Rule Authority · Ga. Ct. App.
Hayes v. Flaum, 138 Ga. App. 787 ( 227 SE2d 512 ); Studebaker Corp. v. Nail, 82 Ga. App. 779, 785 ( 62 SE2d 198 ).
green Harden v. Drost (1980)
Rule Authority · Ga. Ct. App.
Studebaker Corp. v. Nail, 82 Ga. App. 779, 785 ( 62 SE2d 198 ).
green Bobo v. Gebhardt (1980)
Rule Authority · Ga. Ct. App.
Studebaker Corp. v. Nail, 82 Ga. App. 779, 785 ( 62 SE2d 198 ).
green Mathis v. Copeland (1976)
Rule Authority · Ga. Ct. App.
"Where a party sues for specific damages he has the burden of showing the amount of loss claimed in such a way that the jury may calculate the amount of loss from the data furnished and will not be placed in a position where an allowance of the loss is based on guesswork. [Cit.]” Studebaker Corp. v. Nail, 82 Ga. App. 779, 785 ( 62 SE2d 198 ).
green Hayes v. Flaum (1976)
Rule Authority · Ga. Ct. App.
Studebaker Corp. v. Nail, 82 Ga. App. 779, 785 ( 62 SE2d 198 ); Williams & Templeton v. Brewer, 93 Ga. App. 603 (1) ( 92 SE2d 586 ); Big Builder, Inc. v. Evans, 126 Ga. App. 457, 458 (2) ( 191 SE2d 290 ); Taylor v. Roberson, 127 Ga. App. 24 ( 192 SE2d 384 ).
green Douglas v. Rinker (1975)
Rule Authority · Ga. Ct. App.
Studebaker Corp. v. Nail, 82 Ga. App. 779, 785 ( 62 SE2d 198 ).
green Chaffin v. Atlanta Coca Cola Bottling Co. (1972)
Rule Authority · Ga. Ct. App.
See Young v. Certainteed Products Corp., 35 Ga. App. 419 ( 133 SE 279 ); Studebaker Corp. v. Nail, 82 Ga. App. 779, 784 ( 62 SE2d 198 ).
green Western Geophysical Co. of America v. Rowell (1972)
Rule Authority · Ga. Ct. App.
Co. v. Parmalee, 9 Ga. App. 725 ( 72 SE 191 ).’ Studebaker Corp. v. Nail, 82 Ga. App. 779, 785 ( 62 SE2d 198 ); Davis v. Price, 72 Ga. App. 565 ( 34 SE2d 565 ).” In the instant case recovery was sought in the complaint for cracks and crevices in the walls and damage to plaintiff’s water well and drainage lines of his septic tank.
green Ford Motor Company v. Gunn (1971)
Rule Authority · Ga. Ct. App.
Studebaker Corp. v. Nail, 82 Ga. App. 779, 784 ( 62 SE2d 198 ).
green Cova v. Harley Davidson Motor Co. (1970)
Rule Authority · Mich. Ct. App.
“Red” Cornelius, supra fn 32 (power failure necessitating removal of cable); Smith v. Platt Motors, Inc., supra fn 32 (automobile did not run properly); Rhodes Pharmacal Co. v. Continental Can Company, supra fn 32 (aerosol can leaked) ; Lang v. General Motors Corp., supra fn 32 (truck tractor did not operate properly); Inglis v. American Motors Corp., supra fn 32 (automobile did not work properly); Conestoga Cigar Co. v. Finke, supra fn 32 (defective tobacco); Free v. Sluss,…
automobile leaked
green RH MacY & Co., Inc. v. Vest (1965)
Rule Authority · Ga. Ct. App.
Young v. Certainteed Products Corp., 35 Ga. App. 419 ( 133 SE 279 ); Studebaker Corp. v. Nail, 82 Ga. App. 779, 784 ( 62 SE2d 198 ); Smith v. Williams, 117 Ga. 782 (1) ( 45 SE 394 , 97 ASR 220).
green Revlon, Inc. v. Murdock (1961)
Rule Authority · Ga. Ct. App.
As pointed out in Studebaker Corp. v. Nail, 82 Ga. App. 779, 784 ( 62 S. E. 2d 198 ): “We recognize the principle that implied warranties of law are imposed only as between parties in privity of contract, but they are rules of law which the law imposes on contracting parties.
green Chitty v. Horne-Wilson, Inc. (1955)
Rule Authority · Ga. Ct. App.
This court held in the case of Studebaker Corporation v. Nail, 82 Ga. App. 779, 783 (62 *721 S. E. 2d 198): “But a manufacturer may warrant his products to ultimate purchasers.
green Bobby Wolfe v. Chrysler Corporation (1984)
Cited · 11th Cir. · signal: see · 2 citations in this opinion
See Studebaker Corporation v. Nail, 82 Ga.App. 779, 782-83 , 62 S.E.2d 198, 201-02 (1950).
green Chrysler Corp. v. Wilson Plumbing Co. (1974)
Cited · Ga. Ct. App. · signal: see · 4 citations in this opinion
See Studebaker Corp. v. Nail, 82 Ga. App. 779, 784 ( 62 SE2d 198 ).
green Jones v. Cranman's Sporting Goods (1977)
Cited · Ga. Ct. App. · signal: accord · 2 citations in this opinion
Accord, Studebaker Corp. v. Nail, 82 Ga. App. 779, 783 ( 62 SE2d 198 ); Ford Motor Co. v. Lee, 137 Ga. *843 App. 486, 488 ( 224 SE2d 168 ) (affirmed in part; reversed on other grounds, Ford Motor Co. v. Lee, 237 Ga. 554 ( 229 SE2d 379 )).
green Lingo v. Kirby (1977)
Cited · Ga. Ct. App. · signal: accord · 2 citations in this opinion
Accord, Studebaker Corp. v. Nail, 82 Ga. App. 779, 785 ( 62 SE2d 198 ); Williams & Templeton v. Brewer, 93 Ga. App. 603 (1) ( 92 SE2d 586 ); Thomas v. Campbell, 126 Ga. App. 675 (3) ( 191 SE2d 619 ).
green TENDRIFT REALTY COMPANY v. Hayes (1977)
Cited · Ga. Ct. App. · signal: accord · 2 citations in this opinion
Accord, Studebaker Corp. v. Nail, 82 Ga. App. 779, 785 ( 62 SE2d 198 ); Williams & Templeton v. Brewer, 93 Ga. App. 603 (1) ( 92 SE2d 586 ); Thomas v. *897 Campbell, 126 Ga. App. 675 (3) ( 191 SE2d 619 ).