Thompson v. Harris (1969)
green
· 44 citation events
across 4 courts.
Showing the 14 strongest citers on record
(one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).
Treatment trajectory · 1970 → 2026 · click a year to view the case as of then
197019982026
Sort:
By significance ·
Most recent
green
Vereit Real Estate v. Fitness Int'l (2023)
See Thompson v. Harris, 9 Ariz. App. 341, 345 (1969) (“a covenant of quiet enjoyment . . . does not extend to acts of other tenants or third parties unless such acts are performed on behalf of the landlord or by one claiming paramount title”).
“a covenant of quiet enjoyment . . . does not extend to acts of other tenants or third parties unless such acts are performed on behalf of the landlord or by one claiming paramount title”
green
Baker v. Ludeke (2019)
In Thompson v. Harris, this court noted the lack of any case in Arizona applying the right of quiet enjoyment to the activities of other tenants, but cited ten other jurisdictions that recognized that such a right “does not extend to acts of other tenants or third parties unless such acts are performed on behalf of the landlord or by one claiming paramount title.” 9 Ariz. App. 341, 345 (1969) (citations omitted).
citations omitted
green
Procaccianti v. Shaffer (2018)
Thompson v. Harris, 9 Ariz. App. 341, 344 (1969).
green
BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON v. De Meo (2011)
Thompson v. Harris, 9 Ariz.App. 341, 344 , 452 P.2d 122, 125 (1969).
green
Foundation Development Corp. v. Loehmann's, Inc. (1989)
Thompson v. Harris, 9 Ariz. App. 341, 346 , 452 P.2d 122, 127 (1969).
green
DVM CO. v. Bricker (1983)
Thompson v. Harris, 9 Ariz. App. 341, 346 , 452 P.2d 122, 127 (1969).
green
DVM Co. v. Bricker (1983)
Thompson v. Harris, 9 Ariz.App. 341, 346 , 452 P.2d 122, 127 (1969).
green
Blackett v. Olanoff (1977)
See Paterson v. Bridges, 16 Ala. App. 54, 55 (1917); Thompson v. Harris, 9 Ariz. App. 341, 345 (1969), and cases cited; 1 American Law of Property § 3.53 (A.J.
green
Crosby v. Smith (1970)
Crouch v. Truman, 84 Ariz. 360 , 326 P.2d 614 (1958), explaining the pertinent aspect of Crouch v. Pixler, supra; see also Shetter v. Rochelle, 2 Ariz.App. 607 , 411 P.2d 45 (1966); cf. Thompson v. Harris, 9 Ariz.App. 341, 346 , 452 P.2d 122, 127 (1969).
green
Foundation Development Corp. v. Loehmann's, Inc. (1990)
Id. § 6.76, at 393; see also Thompson v. Harris, 9 Ariz.App. 341, 345 , 452 P.2d 122, 126 (1969) (recognizing the general rule that covenants in a lease are independent unless expressly made dependent, and that breach by one party gives rise only to a suit for damages).
recognizing the general rule that covenants in a lease are independent unless expressly made dependent, and that breach by one party gives rise only to a suit for damages
green
Cottonwood Plaza Associates v. Nordale (1982)
Co. v. Covey, 88 Ariz. 80 , 352 P.2d 768 (1960); See also Thompson v. Harris, 9 Ariz.App. 341 , 452 P.2d 122 (1969).
green
Daley v. Earven (1981)
See Annot. 31 A.L.R.2d 321 at 341 and cf., Thompson v. Harris, 9 Ariz.App. 341 , 452 P.2d 122 (1969).
green
Shirley v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. (1979)
See Thompson v. Harris, 9 Ariz.App. 341 , 452 P.2d 122 (1969).