How cited: Thompson v. Harris · Go Syfert

Thompson v. Harris (1969)

green · 44 citation events across 4 courts. Showing the 14 strongest citers on record (one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).
Treatment trajectory · 1970 → 2026 · click a year to view the case as of then
197019982026
green Quintana v. Urbanek (2026)
Rule Authority · Ariz. Ct. App.
Thompson v. Harris, 9 Ariz. App. 341, 344 (1969).
mem. decision
Quote Authority · Ariz. Ct. App. · signal: see
See Thompson v. Harris, 9 Ariz. App. 341, 345 (1969) (“a covenant of quiet enjoyment . . . does not extend to acts of other tenants or third parties unless such acts are performed on behalf of the landlord or by one claiming paramount title”).
“a covenant of quiet enjoyment . . . does not extend to acts of other tenants or third parties unless such acts are performed on behalf of the landlord or by one claiming paramount title”
green Baker v. Ludeke (2019)
Rule Authority · Ariz. Ct. App.
In Thompson v. Harris, this court noted the lack of any case in Arizona applying the right of quiet enjoyment to the activities of other tenants, but cited ten other jurisdictions that recognized that such a right “does not extend to acts of other tenants or third parties unless such acts are performed on behalf of the landlord or by one claiming paramount title.” 9 Ariz. App. 341, 345 (1969) (citations omitted).
citations omitted
Rule Authority · Ariz. Ct. App.
Thompson v. Harris, 9 Ariz. App. 341, 344 (1969).
Rule Authority · Ariz. Ct. App.
Thompson v. Harris, 9 Ariz.App. 341, 344 , 452 P.2d 122, 125 (1969).
Rule Authority · Ariz. Ct. App.
Thompson v. Harris, 9 Ariz. App. 341, 346 , 452 P.2d 122, 127 (1969).
green DVM CO. v. Bricker (1983)
Rule Authority · Ariz.
Thompson v. Harris, 9 Ariz. App. 341, 346 , 452 P.2d 122, 127 (1969).
green DVM Co. v. Bricker (1983)
Rule Authority · Ariz.
Thompson v. Harris, 9 Ariz.App. 341, 346 , 452 P.2d 122, 127 (1969).
green Blackett v. Olanoff (1977)
Rule Authority · Mass.
See Paterson v. Bridges, 16 Ala. App. 54, 55 (1917); Thompson v. Harris, 9 Ariz. App. 341, 345 (1969), and cases cited; 1 American Law of Property § 3.53 (A.J.
green Crosby v. Smith (1970)
Rule Authority · Ariz. Ct. App. · signal: cf.
Crouch v. Truman, 84 Ariz. 360 , 326 P.2d 614 (1958), explaining the pertinent aspect of Crouch v. Pixler, supra; see also Shetter v. Rochelle, 2 Ariz.App. 607 , 411 P.2d 45 (1966); cf. Thompson v. Harris, 9 Ariz.App. 341, 346 , 452 P.2d 122, 127 (1969).
Cited (see also) · Ariz. · signal: see also · 2 citations in this opinion
Id. § 6.76, at 393; see also Thompson v. Harris, 9 Ariz.App. 341, 345 , 452 P.2d 122, 126 (1969) (recognizing the general rule that covenants in a lease are independent unless expressly made dependent, and that breach by one party gives rise only to a suit for damages).
recognizing the general rule that covenants in a lease are independent unless expressly made dependent, and that breach by one party gives rise only to a suit for damages
Cited (see also) · Ariz. Ct. App. · signal: see also · 2 citations in this opinion
Co. v. Covey, 88 Ariz. 80 , 352 P.2d 768 (1960); See also Thompson v. Harris, 9 Ariz.App. 341 , 452 P.2d 122 (1969).
green Daley v. Earven (1981)
Cited · Ariz. Ct. App. · signal: see · 2 citations in this opinion
See Annot. 31 A.L.R.2d 321 at 341 and cf., Thompson v. Harris, 9 Ariz.App. 341 , 452 P.2d 122 (1969).
Cited · Ariz. Ct. App. · signal: see · 2 citations in this opinion
See Thompson v. Harris, 9 Ariz.App. 341 , 452 P.2d 122 (1969).