In Re Estate of Bivians (1982)
green
· 52 citation events
across 9 courts.
Showing the 9 strongest citers on record
(one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).
Treatment trajectory · 1982 → 2026 · click a year to view the case as of then
198220042026
Sort:
By significance ·
Most recent
yellow
Dion v. Rieser (2012)
But see id. at 669 , 798 P.2d at 1055 (stating that the purposes served by comity may be outweighed if the marriage “offends a sufficiently strong [New Mexico] public policy”). {18} Because “the law of the place of contract governs the validity of a marriage” under the rule of comity in New Mexico, In re Bivians, 98 N.M. at 726, 652 P.2d at 748, “[t]o determine whether a valid common[-]law marriage was formed in a foreign jurisdiction, it is . . . necessary to look to the su…
yellow
Dion v. Rieser (2012)
But see id. at 669 , 798 P.2d at 1055 (stating that the purposes served by comity may be outweighed if the marriage “offends a sufficiently strong [New Mexico] public policy”). {18} Because “the law of the place of contract governs the validity of a marriage” under the rule of comity in New Mexico, In re Bivians, 98 N.M. at 726, 652 P.2d at 748, “[t]o determine whether a valid common[-]law marriage was formed in a foreign jurisdiction, it is . . . necessary to look to the su…
green
Rivera v. Rivera (2010)
New Mexico, like Texas, “applies the rule of comity, that the law of the place of contract governs the validity of a marriage.” In re Bivians’ Estate, 98 N.M. 722, 726 , 652 P.2d 744, 748 (Ct.App.1982).
Stat. Ann. § 40-1-10 ; In re Bivians Estate, 98 N.M. 722 , 652 P.2d 744, 748 (1982).
green
Moody v. Stribling (1999)
Joseph Hosp., Inc., 102 N.M. 452, 456 , 697 P.2d 135, 139 (1985) (physician-patient); Swallows v. Laney, 102 N.M. 81, 84 , 691 P.2d 874, 877 (1984) (real estate broker-principal); In re Nelson, 79 N.M. 779, 780 , 450 P.2d 188, 189 (1969) (per curiam) (attorney-client); Doughty v. Morris, 117 N.M. 284, 289 , 871 P.2d 380, 385 (Ct.App.1994) (mother-child); In re Estate of Bivians, 98 N.M. 722, 731 , 652 P.2d 744, 753 (Ct.App.1982) (husband-wife). {18} While both this Court and…
See In re Bivians’ Estate, 98 N.M. 722 , 652 P.2d 744, 748 (N.M.App.1982) (holding that “[ajlthough this stale does not authorize common law marriages, it will recognize such marriages if valid in the jurisdiction where consummated.”). 4 .
green
PAPATHEOFANIS v. Allen (2010)
See In re Bivians’ Estate, 98 N.M. 722, 731 , 652 P.2d 744, 753 (Ct.App.1982) (explaining that a “fiduciary relationship between [a husband and wife] stem[s] from the marital relationship”).
green
Hartford Ins. Co. of the Midwest v. Cline (2005)
See In re Estate of Bivians, 98 N.M. 722 , 652 P.2d 744, 749-750 (1982) (New Mexico does not recognize doctrine of common law marriage); In re Estate of Lamb, 99 N.M. 157 , 655 P.2d 1001 (N.M.1982); Jaramillo v. Providence Washington Ins.
New Mexico does not recognize doctrine of common law marriage
green
Orr v. Bowen (1986)
See In re Estate of Bivians, 98 N.M. 722 , 652 P.2d 744, 750 (1982), cert. quashed, 98 N.M. 762 , 652 P.2d 1213 (1982).