How cited: City of Oregon v. Mill-Maple Properties, Inc. · Go Syfert

City of Oregon v. Mill-Maple Properties, Inc. (1989)

green · 25 citation events across 1 courts. Showing the 4 strongest citers on record (one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).
Treatment trajectory · 1991 → 2026 · click a year to view the case as of then
199120082026
Rule Authority · Or. Ct. App. · 2 citations in this opinion
The city argued in the declaratory judgment action appeal “that the agreement is a ‘land use regulation/ that this is an action to enforce the contractual annexation requirements and that the circuit court therefore has jurisdiction under ORS 197.825 [(3)(a)].” Id. at 241 (footnote omitted).
footnote omitted
Cited · Or. Ct. App. · signal: see · 2 citations in this opinion
See City of Oregon City v. Mill-Maple Properties, Inc., 98 Or App 238 , 779 P2d 172 (1989).
Cited · Or. Ct. App. · signal: see · 2 citations in this opinion
See City of Oregon City v. Mill-Maple Properties, Inc., 98 Or.App. 238 , 779 P.2d 172 (1989).
Cited · Or. Ct. App. · signal: see · 2 citations in this opinion
See City of Oregon City v. Mill-Maple Properties, Inc., 98 Or App 238 , 779 P2d 172 (1989).