How cited: Indus. Com'n v. Adams Cty. Bd. of Cty. Com'rs · Go Syfert

Indus. Com'n v. Adams Cty. Bd. of Cty. Com'rs (1984)

green · 39 citation events across 6 courts. Showing the 12 strongest citers on record (one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).
Treatment trajectory · 1984 → 2026 · click a year to view the case as of then
198420052026
Rule Authority · 10th Cir. · 2 citations in this opinion
See, e.g., Ingram v. Cooper, 698 P.2d 1314, 1315 (Colo.1985); Colorado Dept. of Social Services v. Board of County Commissioners, 697 P.2d 1, 18 (Colo.1985); Industrial Commission v. Board of County Commissioners, 690 P.2d 839, 844 (Colo.1984).
Rule Authority · 10th Cir. · 2 citations in this opinion
See, e.g., Ingram v. Cooper, 698 P.2d 1314, 1315 (Colo.1985); Colorado Dept. of Social Services v. Board of County Commissioners, 697 P.2d 1, 18 (Colo.1985); Industrial Commission v. Board of County Commissioners, 690 P.2d 839, 844 (Colo.1984).
Rule Authority · Colo. Ct. App.
Comm'rs; 690 P.2d at 845. 123 The disputed language in section 8-70-120(1)(a) first appeared in 1977 as one of numerous definitional amendments to CESA.
Rule Authority · Colo.
Comm'rs, 690 P.2d 839, 843-44 (Colo.1984).
Rule Authority · Colo.
Industrial Commission v. Board of County Commissioners, 690 P.2d 839, 844 (Colo.1984).
Cited · Colo. · signal: see
See Ind. Comm'n v. Bd. of County Comm'rs, 690 P.2d 839 , 844 (Colo.1984) ("[I]f the legislature intends that a state statutory scheme be administered in cooperation with and to conform to a concomitant federal enactment, the courts, in interpreting the state statute, should construe the state and federal statutes together to maintain institutional harmony.").
Cited · Colo. · signal: see
See Ind. Comm'n v. Bd. of County Comm'rs, 690 P.2d 839 , 844 (Colo.1984) ("[If the legislature intends that a state statutory scheme be administered in cooperation with and to conform to a concomitant federal enactment, the courts, in interpreting the state statute, should construe the state and federal statutes together to maintain institutional harmony.").
Cited (see also) · Ill. App. Ct. · signal: see also
See also Industrial Comm'n v. Board of County Commissioners , 690 P.2d 839 (Colo. 1984)(agency regulation excluded Head Start programs from definition of educational institution because services that met the educational needs of disadvantaged children are incidental to services addressing children's physical, social, medical, emotional, and nutritional needs).
agency regulation excluded Head Start programs from definition of educational institution because services that met the educational needs of disadvantaged children are incidental to services addressing children's physical, social, medical, emotional, and nutritional needs
Cited · Colo. Ct. App. · signal: see
See Industrial Commission v. Board of County Commissioners, 690 P.2d 839 (Colo.1984) (constitutional issues arising in cases commenced in what is now the Department of Labor and Employment may be raised for the first time on appeal to the court of appeals); cf. Arapahoe Roofing & Sheet Metal, Inc. v. Denver, 831 P.2d 451 (Colo.1992) (better practice is to raise issue of constitutionality of workers’ compensation statute in district court).
Cited · Colo. · signal: see
See Industrial Comm’n v. Board of County Comm’rs, 690 P.2d 839 , 844 n. 6 (Colo.1984) (holding that, while a litigant raised constitutional arguments before an administrative agency, such arguments must be raised for the first time on appeal to the court of appeals).
Cited · Colo. Ct. App. · signal: see
See Industrial Commission v. Board of County Commissioners, 690 P.2d 839 (Colo.1984); cf. Brannaman v. Richlow Manufacturing Co., 106 Colo. 317 , 104 P.2d 897 (1940).
Cited · Colo. · signal: see
See generally Industrial Commission v. Board of County Commissioners of the County of Adams, 690 P.2d 839 , 844 n. 6 (1984); Clasby v. Klapper, 636 P.2d 682, 684-85 (Colo.1981); People ex rel.