STATE EX REL. WYO. WKR'S COMP. v. White (1992)
green
· 47 citation events
across 1 courts.
Showing the 21 strongest citers on record
(one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).
Treatment trajectory · 1992 → 2026 · click a year to view the case as of then
199220092026
Sort:
By significance ·
Most recent
green
Sherwin-Williams Co. v. Borchert (2000)
Wyoming Worker’s Compensation Div. v. White, 837 P.2d 1095, 1098 (Wyo.1992)). ‘Substantial evidence’ is a term of art, best described as ‘relevant evidence that a reasonable mind can accept as adequate to support an agency’s conclusion.’ Casper Oil Co. v. Evenson, 888 P.2d 221, 224 (Wyo.1995).
Worker’s Compensation Div. v. White, 837 P.2d 1095, 1097 (Wyo.1992).
Div. v. White, 837 P.2d 1095, 1097 (Wyo.1992).
green
Wyoming Department of Revenue v. Calhoun (1999)
Wyoming Workers’ Compensation Div. v. White, 837 P.2d 1095, 1098 (Wyo.1992) and Trout v. Wyoming Oil & Gas Conservation Com’n, 721 P.2d 1047, 1050 (Wyo.1986)).
green
Matter of Thompson (1998)
Wyoming Workers' Compensation Div. v. White, 837 P.2d 1095, 1098 (Wyo.1992)).
green
E.H. Oftedal & Sons, Inc. v. Thompson (1998)
Wyoming Workers’ Compensation Div. v. White, 837 P.2d 1095, 1098 (Wyo.1992)).
Wyoming Worker’s Compensation Div. v. White, 837 P.2d 1095, 1098 (Wyo.1992)). ‘Substantial evidence’ is a term of art, best described as ‘relevant evidence that a reasonable mind can accept as adequate to support an agency’s conclusion.’ Casper Oil Co. v. Evenson, 888 P.2d 221, 224 (Wyo.1995).
green
Worker's Compensation Claim of Haagensen v. State ex rel. Wyoming Workers' Compensation Division (1997)
Wyoming Workers’ Compensation Div. v. White, 837 P.2d 1095, 1098 (Wyo.1992)).
green
Haagensen v. STATE EX REL. WORKERS'COMP. (1997)
Wyoming Workers' Compensation Div. v. White, 837 P.2d 1095, 1098 (Wyo.1992)).
green
BF DRILLING v. State (1997)
Wyoming Workers' Compensation Div. v. White, 837 P.2d 1095, 1098 (Wyo.1992)).
Wyoming Workers’ Compensation Div. v. White, 837 P.2d 1095, 1098 (Wyo.1992)).
green
Walsh v. Holly Sugar Corp. (1997)
Wyoming Worker’s Compensation Div. v. White, 837 P.2d 1095, 1099 (Wyo.1992); Herring v. Welltech, Inc., 660 P.2d 361, 366 (Wyo.1983); Black Watch Farms v. Baldwin, 474 P.2d 297, 299-300 (Wyo.1970).
Wyoming Worker’s Compensation Div. v. White, 837 P.2d 1095, 1098 (Wyo. 1992) (quoting Trout v. Wyoming Oil & Gas Conservation Comm’n, 721 P.2d 1047, 1050 (Wyo.1986)).
quoting Trout v. Wyoming Oil & Gas Conservation Comm’n, 721 P.2d 1047, 1050 (Wyo.1986)
green
LARAMIE CTY. BD. OF EQUAL. v. State Bd. (1996)
Wyoming Worker's Compensation Div. v. White, 837 P.2d 1095, 1098 (Wyo.1992) (quoting Trout v. Wyoming Oil & Gas Conservation Comm'n, 721 P.2d 1047, 1050 (Wyo.1986)).
green
Workers' Compensation Claim of Coleman v. State ex rel. Wyoming Workers' Compensation Division (1996)
Wyoming Worker’s Compensation Div. v. White, 837 P.2d 1095, 1098 (Wyo.1992)).
green
Coleman v. STATE EX REL. WYOMING WORKERS'COMP. DIV. (1996)
Wyoming Worker's Compensation Div. v. White, 837 P.2d 1095, 1098 (Wyo.1992)).
Worker’s Compensation Div. v. White, 837 P.2d 1095, 1099 (Wyo.1992).
Wyoming Worker’s Compensation Div. v. White, 837 P.2d 1095, 1097 (Wyo.1992).
Worker’s Compensation Div. v. White, 837 P.2d 1095, 1098 (Wyo.1992).
green
Gilstrap v. STATE EX REL. WYO. WKRS. COMP. (1994)
Wyoming Worker's Compensation Division v. White, 837 P.2d 1095, 1097 (Wyo.1992), we stated: Impairment of earning capacity is determined by taking into consideration the following factors: (a) Physical impairmentthe nature and extent of injury. (b) The worker's age. (c) The worker's education. (d) Ability to continue pre-injury employment. (e) Post-injury employment prospects. (f) Pre-injury earnings. (g) Post-injury earnings.
green
Worker's Compensation Claim of Gilstrap v. State ex rel. Wyoming Workers' Compensation Division (1994)
Wyoming Worker’s Compensation Division v. White, 837 P.2d 1095, 1097 (Wyo.1992), we stated: Impairment of earning capacity is determined by taking into consideration the following factors: (a) Physical impairment — the nature and extent of injury. (b) The worker’s age. (c) The worker’s education. (d) Ability to continue pre-injury employment. (e) Post-injury employment prospects. (f) Pre-injury earnings. (g) Post-injury earnings.