How cited: Island Air, Inc. v. LaBar · Go Syfert

Island Air, Inc. v. LaBar (1977)

green · 89 citation events across 14 courts. Showing the 13 strongest citers on record (one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).
Treatment trajectory · 1978 → 2026 · click a year to view the case as of then
197820022026
Rule Authority · 6th Cir. · 2 citations in this opinion
Aug. 4, 2008); Leigh Furniture & Carpet Co. v. Isom, 657 P.2d 293, 306 (Utah 1982); Island Air, Inc. v. LaBar, 18 Wash.App. 129 , 566 P.2d 972, 980 (1977).
Rule Authority · 11th Cir. · 2 citations in this opinion
See Monette v. AM-7-7 Baking Co., 929 F.2d 276, 281-83 (6th Cir.1991) (holding that the defendant improperly induced the breach of a business relationship when the defendant accompanied the plaintiff on his sales route under the pretext of helping the plaintiff increase his sales, but instead compiled a list of the plaintiff's customers and used the customer list to assume the plaintiff's route); Island Air, Inc. v. LaBar, 18 Wash.App. 129 , 566 P.2d 972, 979-80 (Wash.Ct.App…
Rule Authority · 11th Cir.
See Monette v. AM-7-7 Baking Co., 929 F.2d 276, 281-83 (6th Cir. 1991) (holding that the defendant improperly induced the breach of a business relationship when the defendant accompanied the plaintiff on his sales route under the pretext of helping the plaintiff increase his sales, but instead compiled a list of the plaintiff’s customers and used the customer list to assume the plaintiff’s route); Island Air, Inc. v. LaBar, 566 P.2d 972, 979-80 (Wash. Ct. App. 1977) (rejecti…
rejecting the defendant's competition privilege defense when the defendant elicited secret information about the plaintiff's at-will contract with UPS and broke its promise not to use the 18 information to compete with the plaintiff
Rule Authority · 11th Cir.
See Monette v. AM-7-7 Baking Co., 929 F.2d 276, 281-83 (6th Cir. 1991) (holding that the defendant improperly induced the breach of a business relationship when the defendant accompanied the plaintiff on his sales route under the pretext of helping the plaintiff increase his sales, but instead compiled a list of the plaintiff’s customers and used the customer list to assume the plaintiff’s route); Island Air, Inc. v. LaBar, 566 P.2d 972, 979-80 (Wash. Ct. App. 1977) (rejecti…
rejecting the defendant's competition privilege defense when the defendant elicited secret information about the plaintiff's at-will contract with UPS and broke its promise not to use the 18 information to compete with the plaintiff
Quote Authority · Md. Ct. Spec. App. · signal: see also · 2 citations in this opinion
See also Island Air, Inc. v. Les La Bar, 18 Wash.App. 129 , 566 P.2d 972, 980 (1977) (“Disregard for a valid restrictive covenant cannot be endorsed”).
“Disregard for a valid restrictive covenant cannot be endorsed”
green Duggin v. Adams (1987)
Rule Authority · Va. · 2 citations in this opinion
Co., 283 Or. 201 , 210 n. 11, 582 P.2d 1365 , 1371 n. 11 (1978) (plaintiff claiming intentional interference with contractual or other economic relations need not allege and prove all elements of liability for independent tort); Island Air, Inc. v. LaBar, 18 Wash.App. 129, 143-44 , 566 P.2d 972, 980 (1977) (competitor's acquisition and use of confidential contractual information in violation of oral covenant not to compete constituted improper method of interfering with plai…
competitor's acquisition and use of confidential contractual information in violation of oral covenant not to compete constituted improper method of interfering with plaintiff's at-will contract
Rule Authority · N.M. Ct. App. · 2 citations in this opinion
Super. 135 , 182 A.2d 387, 394 (1962); Island Air, Inc. v. LaBar, 18 Wash. App. 129 , 566 P.2d 972, 980 (1977).
Rule Authority · Winchester Cir. Ct.
Co., 283 Or. 201, 210, n. 11 , 582 P.2d 1365, 1371, n. 11 (1978) (plaintiff claiming intentional interference with contractual or other economic relations need not allege and prove all elements of liability for independent tort); Island Air, Inc. v. LaBar, 18 Wash. App. 129, 143-44 , 566 P.2d 972, 980 (1977) (competitor’s acquisition and use of confidential contractual information in violation of oral covenant not to compete constituted improper method of interfering with pl…
competitor’s acquisition and use of confidential contractual information in violation of oral covenant not to compete constituted improper method of interfering with plaintiffs at-will contract
Cited · Cal. · signal: accord · 4 citations in this opinion
(See Alyeska Pipeline Service v. Aurora Air Service (Alaska 1979) 604 P.2d 1090, 1093 ; accord, Island Air, Inc. v. LaBar, supra, 18 Wn.App. 129 [ 566 P.2d 972 ]; Smith v. Ford Motor Co., supra, 289 N.C. 71 [ 221 S.E.2d 282 ]; Mason v. Funderburk (1969) 247 Ark. 521 [ 446 S.W.2d 543, 546 ]; Geschow v. Commonwealth Edison Co. (1982) 111 Ill.App.3d 522 [ 444 N.E.2d 579 ]; but see Ulan v. Lucas (1972) 18 Ariz.App. 129 [ 500 P.2d 914 ]; Radiology Professional Corp. v. Trinidad, …
Cited (see also) · Wash. Ct. App. · signal: see also · 2 citations in this opinion
Restatement (Second) of Torts § 766, comment g, at 10-11 (1979); see also Island Air, Inc. v. LaBar, 18 Wn.
Cited · Alaska · signal: accord · 2 citations in this opinion
Accord, Island Air, Inc. v. LaBar, 18 Wash.App. 129 , 566 P.2d 972 (1977); Mason v. Funderburk, 446 S.W.2d 543, 546 (Ark.1969).
Cited (see also) · Wash. Ct. App. · signal: see also
See also Island Air, Inc. v. LaBar, 18 Wn.
Cited · Wash. · signal: see
See Island Air, Inc. v. LaBar, 18 Wn.