How cited: Klein v. George G. Kerasotes Corp. · Go Syfert

Klein v. George G. Kerasotes Corp. (2007)

green · 37 citation events across 6 courts. Showing the 16 strongest citers on record (one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).
Treatment trajectory · 2010 → 2026 · click a year to view the case as of then
201020182026
Rule Authority · 7th Cir. · 2 citations in this opinion
Kerasotes Corp., 500 F.3d 669, 671 (7th Cir. 2007), in this case Illinois.
Rule Authority · 7th Cir.
Kerasotes Corp., 500 F.3d 669, 671 (7th Cir. 2007) (recognizing that the Illinois Se- curities Law’s limitations periods apply to common law claims that otherwise could have been brought as securities fraud claims under the statute).
recognizing that the Illinois Se- curities Law’s limitations periods apply to common law claims that otherwise could have been brought as securities fraud claims under the statute
Rule Authority · 7th Cir.
Kerasotes Corp., 500 F.3d 669, 671 (7th Cir. 2007) (recognizing that the Illinois Se- curities Law’s limitations periods apply to common law claims that otherwise could have been brought as securities fraud claims under the statute).
recognizing that the Illinois Se- curities Law’s limitations periods apply to common law claims that otherwise could have been brought as securities fraud claims under the statute
Rule Authority · 7th Cir.
We applied the same reasoning in Klein to conclude the Illinois securities laws governed the plaintiff's claims. 500 F.3d at 672-74 (affirming dismissal of plaintiff's claims for common law fraud, breach of fiduciary duty, and punitive damages as untimely under the Illinois securities laws). 3 In Klein , we held that whether a plaintiff's claim amounts to an action for relief under the Illinois securities law, or upon or because of any of the matters for which relief is gran…
affirming dismissal of plaintiff's claims for common law fraud, breach of fiduciary duty, and punitive damages as untimely under the Illinois securities laws
Rule Authority · N.D. Ill. · 3 citations in this opinion
Kerasotes Corp., 500 F.3d 669, 671 (7th Cir. 2007).
Rule Authority · N.D. Ill. · 2 citations in this opinion
Kerasotes Corp., 500 F.3d 669, 671 (7th Cir.2007) (13(D) barred claims of breach of fiduciary duty and fraud).
green Fanady v. Dart (2025)
Rule Authority · N.D. Ill.
Kerasotes Corp., 500 F.3d 669, 671 (7th Cir. 2007), Fanady would be well advised to articulate his claims and theories clearly rather than relying on paragraphs with multiple sub- parts asserting facts and conclusions that implicate multiple different theories and multiple groups of defendants.
green THOMAS v. THOMAS (2022)
Rule Authority · S.D. Ind.
Kerasotes Corp., 500 F.3d 669, 671 (7th Cir. 2007).
green THOMAS v. THOMAS (2022)
Rule Authority · S.D. Ind.
Kerasotes Corp., 500 F.3d 669, 671 (7th Cir. 2007).
Rule Authority · N.D. Ill.
Kerasotes Corp., 500 F.3d 669, 671 (7th Cir. 2007); see also, e.g., Muhammad-Ali v. Final Call, Inc., 832 F.3d 755, 761 (7th Cir. 2016) (“Pleadings need not, and do not, allege legal theories.”); Albiero v. City of Kankakee, 122 F.3d 417, 419 (7th Cir. 1997) (“One [misconception] is that a complaint must set out, and that its validity depends on, a legal theory, such as ‘due process’ or ‘equal protection.’ That is not so … .
green Wu v. Kallies (2021)
Rule Authority · N.D. Ill.
Kerasotes Corp., 500 F.3d 669, 671 (7th Cir. 2007).
Rule Authority · N.D. Ill.
Kerasotes Corp., 500 F.3d 669, 671 (7th Cir. 2007).
Rule Authority · C.D. Ill.
Kerasotes Corp., 500 F.3d 669, 671 (7th Cir. 2007).
Rule Authority · N.D. Ill.
Kerasotes Corporation that section 13(G), the express terms of which apply to “any party in interest,” provides a remedy for stock sellers. 500 F.3d 669, 673 (7th Cir. 2007) (holding that the ISL’s statute of repose, which can apply even where a complaint does not directly invoke the ISL, applied to a seller’s complaint alleging breach of fiduciary duty and common law fraud because the alleged acts were cognizable under the ISL).
holding that the ISL’s statute of repose, which can apply even where a complaint does not directly invoke the ISL, applied to a seller’s complaint alleging breach of fiduciary duty and common law fraud because the alleged acts were cognizable under the ISL
Rule Authority · N.D. Ill.
Kerasotes Corp., 500 F.3d. 669, 671 (7th Cir. 2007) (citing Walker v. Armco Steel Corp., 446 U.S. 740 , 751–52 (1980)).
citing Walker v. Armco Steel Corp., 446 U.S. 740 , 751–52 (1980)
Rule Authority · S.D.N.Y.
Kerasotes Corp., 500 F.3d 669, 671-74 (7th Cir.2007), Even if New York law applied to the Illinois common law claim, New York’s borrowing statute would import the , Illinois limitations period.