State v. Cunningham (1977)
green
· 41 citation events
across 3 courts.
Showing the 3 strongest citers on record
(one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).
Treatment trajectory · 1978 → 2026 · click a year to view the case as of then
197820022026
Sort:
By significance ·
Most recent
green
State v. Daniels (1978)
As Justice Kaul stated in State v. Cunningham, 222 Kan. at 706, the record must establish that the defendant knew what he was doing and “made his choice with his eyes open.” The ABA Standards Relating To the Function of the Trial Judge, § 6.6 at 84, 85 (Approved Draft, 1972), suggest the trial judge’s inquiry show that the defendant: “(i) has been clearly advised of his right to the assistance of counsel, including his right to the assignment of counsel when he is so entitle…
green
State v. Collins (1995)
See also State v. Cunningham, 222 Kan. 704, 707, 567 P.2d 879 (1977) (where the record fully established that the defendant’s choice of self-representation was knowingly and intelligently made, the trial court would have committed reversible error in depriving the defendant of his constitutional right to self-representation).
where the record fully established that the defendant’s choice of self-representation was knowingly and intelligently made, the trial court would have committed reversible error in depriving the defendant of his constitutional right to self-representation
green
State v. McDaniel & Owens (1980)
See State v. Cunningham, 222 Kan. at 707; State v. Rueckert, 221 Kan. at 733 ; State v. Thompson, 221 Kan. 165, 174 , 558 P.2d 1079 (1976). *178 Owens contends the trial court should have given PIK Crim. 54.12, which states: “Voluntary intoxication is not a defense to a criminal charge, but when a particular intent or other state of mind is a necessary element of the offense charged, intoxication may be taken into consideration in determining whether the accused was capable …