How cited: McCarthy v. DEPT. OF SOCIAL AND HEALTH SERVS. · Go Syfert

McCarthy v. DEPT. OF SOCIAL AND HEALTH SERVS. (1988)

green · 83 citation events across 6 courts. Showing the 10 strongest citers on record (one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).
Treatment trajectory · 1988 → 2026 · click a year to view the case as of then
198820072026
Rule Authority · Wash. Ct. App. · 2 citations in this opinion
McCarthy, 110 Wn.2d at 816.
Rule Authority · Wash. Ct. App. · 2 citations in this opinion
Italics ours.) McCarthy, 110 Wn.2d at 816-17; see Wilmot v. Kaiser Aluminum & Chem.
Rule Authority · Wash. Ct. App.
McCarthy, 110 Wn.2d at 818.
Rule Authority · Wash.
We held that employers can be directly sued for illness arising out of workplace exposure to tobacco smoke when such illness is not an occupational disease that falls within the basic coverage of the Washington Industrial Insurance Act, Title 51 ROW See McCarthy, 110 Wn.2d at 825.
Cited (see also) · 10th Cir. · signal: see, e.g. · 4 citations in this opinion
See, e.g., McCarthy v. Department of Social & Health Servs., 110 Wash.2d 812 , 759 P.2d 351 , 355 (1988) (en banc) (discussing local ordinances in State of Washington). 32 In the face of the health risks of ETS, confirmed by the widespread recognition of the hazards, we conclude that Clemmons' involuntary exposure to ETS in an eight-foot cell raises a triable issue of fact as to whether such exposure creates an unreasonable risk to health.
en banc
Cited · Wash. · signal: see · 4 citations in this opinion
RCW 51.04.010; see McCarthy v. Department of Social & Health Servs., 110 Wn.2d 812 , 816, 759 P.2d 351 (1988); Reese v. Sears, Roebuck & Co., 107 Wn.2d 563, 571 , 731 P.2d 497 (1987), overruled on other grounds in Phillips v. Seattle, 111 Wn.2d 903, 909-10 , 766 P.2d 1099 (1989).
Cited · Wash. Ct. App. · signal: see · 2 citations in this opinion
See McCarthy v. Dep’t of Soc. & Health Servs., 110 Wn.2d 812, 817 , 759 P.2d 351 (1988); see also Rothwell v. Nine Mile Falls Sch.
Cited (see also) · La. · signal: see, e.g. · 2 citations in this opinion
See, e.g., McCarthy v. Department of Soc. & Health Servs., 110 Wash.2d 812 , 759 P.2d 351 (1988); Zurowska v. Berlin Indus., Inc., 282 Ill.
Cited · Wash. · signal: see · 2 citations in this opinion
See McCarthy, 110 Wash.2d at 825, 759 P.2d 351 . [13] Two board certified industrial hygienists analyzed the studies that the Department relied upon and advised then-Director Brown. [14] The dissent cites two law review articles, including one that was entirely outside the record of this case, to support the assertion that "[a]ntismoking regulations have a disproportionate effect upon the poor and African-Americans." Dissenting op. at 723 n. 18 (citing Rivka Widerman, Tobacc…
Cited · Wash. Ct. App. · signal: see · 2 citations in this opinion
Regis Paper Co., 60 Wn.2d 484, 485 , 374 P.2d 675 (1962); see McCarthy v. Department of Social & Health Servs., 110 Wn.2d 812 , 823, 759 P.2d 351 (1988) (collateral estoppel); Malland v. Department of Retirement Sys., 103 Wn.2d 484, 490 , 694 P.2d 16 (1985) (same).
collateral estoppel