How cited: State v. Rainford · Go Syfert

State v. Rainford (1997)

green · 18 citation events across 2 courts. Showing the 4 strongest citers on record (one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).
All Green 4
Sort: By significance · Most recent
green State of Washington v. David Aaron Soto (2013)
Quote Authority · Wash. Ct. App.
App. 431 ,441 n.6, 936 P.2d 1210 (1997) ("RCW 9.94.041 [possession of controlled substances by prisoners] is an unranked felony under the Sentencing Reform Act of 1981 and is not 9 No. 30121-4-111 State v. Soto subject to enhancement for possession within a correctional facility under [RCW 9 .94A.S33(S)(c)]. ").
"RCW 9.94.041 [possession of controlled substances by prisoners] is an unranked felony under the Sentencing Reform Act of 1981 and is not 9 No. 30121-4-111 State v. Soto subject to enhancement for possession within a correctional facility under [RCW 9 .94A.S33(S)(c)]. "
green State v. Soto (2013)
Quote Authority · Wash. Ct. App.
App. 431 , 441 n.6, 936 P.2d 1210 (1997) (“RCW 9.94.041 [possession of controlled substances by prisoners] is an unranked felony under the Sentencing Reform Act of 1981[, chapter 9.94A RCW,] and is not subject to enhancement for possession within a correctional facility under [RCW 9.94A.533(5)(c)].”). ¶24 If the legislature made an error in drafting the statute, as the State assumes, we must leave it to the legislature to correct the error.
“RCW 9.94.041 [possession of controlled substances by prisoners] is an unranked felony under the Sentencing Reform Act of 1981[, chapter 9.94A RCW,] and is not subject to enhancement for possession within a correctional facility under [RCW 9.94A.533(5)(c)].”
green State v. Modica (2006)
Quote Authority · Wash. Ct. App.
State v. Rainford, 86 Wash. App. 431, 438 , 936 P.2d 1210 (1997) ("[A]n inmate's expectation of privacy is necessarily lowered while in custody.").
"[A]n inmate's expectation of privacy is necessarily lowered while in custody."
green State v. Foster (1998)
Cited (see also) · Wash. · signal: see, e.g.
See, e.g., State v. Rainford, 86 Wash.App. 431, 436 , 936 P.2d 1210 (our state constitutional analysis begins with federal law only to place the state law in context), review denied, 133 Wash.2d 1019 , 948 P.2d 387 (1997).